FLOC
Flowco Holdings Inc.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$804M
5Y Perf.-11.3%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FLOC vs XOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Oil & Gas Integrated
Market Cap$620.85B
5Y Perf.+35.2%
FLOC vs XOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FLOC | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Market Cap | $804M | $620.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $777M | $323.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $71M | $28.84B |
| Gross Margin | 24.8% | 21.7% |
| Operating Margin | 19.4% | 10.5% |
| Forward P/E | 16.1x | 14.3x |
| Total Debt | $219M | $43.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $10.68B |
FLOC vs XOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FLOC
XOM
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flowco Holdings Inc. (FLOC) | 100 | 88.7 | -11.3% |
| Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM) | 100 | 135.2 | +35.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FLOC vs XOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: XOM leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. Flowco Holdings Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FLOC
Flowco Holdings Inc.
The Growth Play
FLOC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 41.9%, EPS growth -95.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.18, Low D/E 16.1%, current ratio 3.34x
- Beta 1.18, yield 1.6%, current ratio 3.34x
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
The Income Pick
XOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 26 yrs, beta -0.15, yield 2.7%
- 105.0% 10Y total return vs FLOC's -16.2%
- Lower P/E (14.3x vs 16.1x)
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FLOC | 41.9% revenue growth vs XOM's -4.5% |
| Value | XOM | Lower P/E (14.3x vs 16.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | FLOC | 9.1% margin vs XOM's 8.9% |
| Stability / Safety | FLOC | Lower D/E ratio (16.1% vs 16.3%) |
| Dividends | XOM | 2.7% yield, 26-year raise streak, vs FLOC's 1.6% |
| Momentum (1Y) | XOM | +43.9% vs FLOC's +19.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | XOM | 6.4% ROA vs FLOC's 4.1%, ROIC 8.6% vs 7.2% |
FLOC vs XOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FLOC vs XOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLFLOCLAGGINGXOM
XOMExxon Mobil Corporati…
2leads
FLOCFlowco Holdings Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs XOMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
FLOC6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FLOC4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
FLOC5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
XOM5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
XOM2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLOC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 416.9x FLOC's $777M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 9.1% (FLOC) to 8.9% (XOM). On growth, FLOC holds the edge at +8.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FLOCFlowco Holdings I… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $777M | $323.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $301M | $59.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $71M | $28.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $205M | $23.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.8% | +21.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +10.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.3% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.9% | -1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.2% | -11.0% |
FLOC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FLOC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.9x trailing earnings, XOM trades at a 59% valuation discount to FLOC's 53.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FLOC's 3.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than XOM's 10.9x.
| Metric | FLOCFlowco Holdings I… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $804M | $620.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $653.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 53.39x | 21.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.11x | 14.31x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.47x | 10.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.06x | 1.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.64x | 2.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.81x | 26.29x |
FLOC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLOC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XOM delivers a 10.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $5 for FLOC. FLOC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XOM's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLOC scores 7/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | FLOCFlowco Holdings I… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.3% | +10.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.1% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.2% | +8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.7% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $215M | $32.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $219M | $43.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.43x | 69.44x |
FLOC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XOM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XOM five years ago would be worth $26,464 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,377 for FLOC. Over the past 12 months, XOM leads with a +43.9% total return vs FLOC's +19.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XOM at 13.2% vs FLOC's -5.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FLOCFlowco Holdings I… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +29.5% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.4% | +43.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.2% | +44.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.2% | +164.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.2% | +105.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.7% | +13.2% |
XOM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLOC and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLOC's 1.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLOC currently trades 95.3% from its 52-week high vs XOM's 83.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FLOCFlowco Holdings I… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.76 | $176.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.03 | $101.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.3% | +83.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.3 | 42.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 721K | 18.9M |
Evenly matched — FLOC and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
XOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FLOC as "Buy" and XOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.1% upside for FLOC (target: $30) vs 10.0% for XOM (target: $161). For income investors, XOM offers the higher dividend yield at 2.73% vs FLOC's 1.58%.
| Metric | FLOCFlowco Holdings I… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.50 | $161.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 26 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.39 | $4.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | +3.3% |
XOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
FLOC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). XOM leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
Best OverallFlowco Holdings Inc. (FLOC)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FLOC vs XOM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLOC or XOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Flowco Holdings Inc.
(FLOC) is the stronger pick with 41. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) offers the better valuation at 21. 9x trailing P/E (14. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Flowco Holdings Inc. (FLOC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FLOC or XOM?
On trailing P/E, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the cheapest at 21.
9x versus Flowco Holdings Inc. at 53. 4x. On forward P/E, Exxon Mobil Corporation is actually cheaper at 14. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FLOC or XOM?
Over the past 5 years, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) delivered a total return of +164.
6%, compared to -16. 2% for Flowco Holdings Inc. (FLOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XOM returned +102. 6% versus FLOC's -15. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FLOC or XOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Flowco Holdings Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning FLOC is approximately -661% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Flowco Holdings Inc. (FLOC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 16% for Exxon Mobil Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FLOC or XOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flowco Holdings Inc.
(FLOC) is pulling ahead at 41. 9% versus -4. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Exxon Mobil Corporation grew EPS -14. 5% year-over-year, compared to -95. 6% for Flowco Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLOC leads at 72. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FLOC or XOM?
Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
9% net margin versus 5. 4% for Flowco Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLOC leads at 19. 6% versus 10. 5% for XOM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLOC leads at 34. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FLOC or XOM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) trades at 14.
3x forward P/E versus 16. 1x for Flowco Holdings Inc. — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FLOC: 20. 1% to $29. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — FLOC or XOM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 1. 6% for Flowco Holdings Inc. (FLOC).
09Is FLOC or XOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 7% yield, +102. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +102. 6%, FLOC: -15. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FLOC and XOM?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FLOC is a small-cap high-growth stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(FLOC: 8.9% · XOM: -1.3%)Net Margin>
%
(FLOC: 9.1% · XOM: 8.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(FLOC: 53.4x · XOM: 21.9x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.