Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FLUT vs CZR vs DKNG vs MGM vs WYNN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
FLUT vs CZR vs DKNG vs MGM vs WYNN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $17.64B | $5.66B | $12.50B | $9.75B | $11.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17.02B | $11.56B | $6.05B | $17.72B | $7.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-455M | $-485M | $4M | $183M | $425M |
| Gross Margin | 44.2% | 43.9% | 41.3% | 44.2% | 28.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.4% | 17.8% | -0.2% | 5.2% | 15.7% |
| Forward P/E | 16.8x | — | 104.4x | 21.5x | 19.7x |
| Total Debt | $13.35B | $26.34B | $1.93B | $56.16B | $12.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.83B | $887M | $1.60B | $2.06B | $1.46B |
FLUT vs CZR vs DKNG vs MGM vs WYNN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flutter Entertainme… (FLUT) | 100 | 78.4 | -21.6% |
| Caesars Entertainme… (CZR) | 100 | 246.2 | +146.2% |
| DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) | 100 | 64.3 | -35.7% |
| MGM Resorts Interna… (MGM) | 100 | 225.8 | +125.8% |
| Wynn Resorts, Limit… (WYNN) | 100 | 123.0 | +23.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FLUT vs CZR vs DKNG vs MGM vs WYNN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FLUT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (16.8x vs 19.7x)
CZR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
DKNG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, current ratio 1.03x
- Beta 1.12, current ratio 1.03x
- 27.0% revenue growth vs WYNN's 0.1%
MGM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 81.8% 10Y total return vs DKNG's 157.3%
WYNN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.23, yield 1.6%
- 5.8% margin vs CZR's -4.2%
- 1.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- +28.2% vs FLUT's -58.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.0% revenue growth vs WYNN's 0.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.8x vs 19.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.8% margin vs CZR's -4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.12 vs MGM's 1.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.2% vs FLUT's -58.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.3% ROA vs FLUT's -1.6%, ROIC 9.3% vs 4.5% |
FLUT vs CZR vs DKNG vs MGM vs WYNN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FLUT vs CZR vs DKNG vs MGM vs WYNN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WYNN leads in 2 of 6 categories
CZR leads 1 • FLUT leads 0 • DKNG leads 0 • MGM leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — DKNG and WYNN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGM is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.7B annually — 2.9x DKNG's $6.1B. WYNN is the more profitable business, keeping 5.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZR's -4.2%. On growth, DKNG holds the edge at +42.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17.0B | $11.6B | $6.1B | $17.7B | $7.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.0B | $3.5B | $266M | $2.0B | $1.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$455M | -$485M | $4M | $183M | $425M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $880M | $538M | $612M | $1.7B | $872M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.2% | +43.9% | +41.3% | +44.2% | +28.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.4% | +17.8% | -0.2% | +5.2% | +15.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | -4.2% | +0.1% | +1.0% | +5.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | +4.7% | +10.1% | +9.8% | +12.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.4% | +2.7% | +42.8% | +4.2% | +9.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -22.3% | +11.1% | +192.9% | -5.9% | +50.7% |
Valuation Metrics
CZR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 34.0x trailing earnings, WYNN trades at a 32% valuation discount to MGM's 50.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CZR's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DKNG's 49.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17.6B | $5.7B | $12.5B | $9.8B | $11.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $27.2B | $31.1B | $12.8B | $63.8B | $22.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -58.47x | -11.48x | -3113.58x | 50.14x | 34.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.79x | — | 104.42x | 21.53x | 19.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.69x | 8.90x | 49.42x | 31.61x | 12.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.08x | 0.49x | 2.06x | 0.56x | 1.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.87x | 1.57x | 19.81x | 3.08x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.35x | 10.88x | 19.31x | 5.85x | 16.10x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WYNN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MGM delivers a 5.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-13 for CZR. FLUT carries lower financial leverage with a 1.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGM's 17.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DKNG scores 7/9 vs FLUT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.3% | -12.6% | +0.5% | +5.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.6% | -1.5% | +0.1% | +0.4% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.5% | +5.4% | -0.9% | +1.7% | +9.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.6% | +7.0% | -0.6% | +2.6% | +9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.38x | 7.15x | 3.06x | 17.14x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9.5B | $25.5B | $330M | $54.1B | $10.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.8B | $887M | $1.6B | $2.1B | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13.3B | $26.3B | $1.9B | $56.2B | $12.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.04x | 0.90x | 1.92x | 1.52x | 2.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CZR and DKNG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MGM five years ago would be worth $9,551 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,627 for CZR. Over the past 12 months, WYNN leads with a +28.2% total return vs FLUT's -58.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DKNG at 1.4% vs FLUT's -20.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -53.7% | +17.9% | -29.3% | +4.4% | -12.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -58.3% | +2.5% | -27.3% | +20.1% | +28.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.0% | -38.6% | +4.3% | -12.3% | -2.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.7% | -73.7% | -47.9% | -4.5% | -13.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.9% | +302.6% | +157.3% | +81.8% | +34.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.1% | -15.0% | +1.4% | -4.3% | -0.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DKNG and MGM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DKNG is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MGM's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MGM currently trades 93.1% from its 52-week high vs FLUT's 32.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.17x | 1.24x | 1.06x | 1.24x | 1.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $313.69 | $31.58 | $48.78 | $40.94 | $134.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $97.94 | $17.95 | $20.46 | $29.19 | $82.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +32.2% | +88.0% | +51.7% | +93.1% | +79.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.0 | 54.5 | 55.1 | 50.0 | 55.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.4M | 4.6M | 12.9M | 4.4M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
WYNN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FLUT as "Buy", CZR as "Buy", DKNG as "Buy", MGM as "Buy", WYNN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 103.8% upside for FLUT (target: $206) vs 4.2% for MGM (target: $40). WYNN is the only dividend payer here at 1.57% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $206.13 | $30.57 | $36.64 | $39.71 | $141.90 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 30 | 48 | 36 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $1.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.4% | +4.0% | +6.6% | +12.6% | +3.4% |
WYNN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). CZR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
FLUT vs CZR vs DKNG vs MGM vs WYNN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLUT or CZR or DKNG or MGM or WYNN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the stronger pick with 27. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 1% for Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN). Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN) offers the better valuation at 34. 0x trailing P/E (19. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FLUT or CZR or DKNG or MGM or WYNN?
On trailing P/E, Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN) is the cheapest at 34.
0x versus MGM Resorts International at 50. 1x. On forward P/E, Flutter Entertainment plc is actually cheaper at 16. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FLUT or CZR or DKNG or MGM or WYNN?
Over the past 5 years, MGM Resorts International (MGM) delivered a total return of -4.
5%, compared to -73. 7% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZR returned +306. 4% versus FLUT's -22. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FLUT or CZR or DKNG or MGM or WYNN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 06β versus MGM Resorts International's 1. 24β — meaning MGM is approximately 17% more volatile than DKNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 138% versus 17% for MGM Resorts International — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FLUT or CZR or DKNG or MGM or WYNN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is pulling ahead at 27. 0% versus 0. 1% for Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DraftKings Inc. grew EPS 99. 2% year-over-year, compared to -820. 8% for Flutter Entertainment plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKNG leads at 39. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FLUT or CZR or DKNG or MGM or WYNN?
Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
6% net margin versus -4. 4% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CZR leads at 18. 1% versus -0. 3% for DKNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLUT leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FLUT or CZR or DKNG or MGM or WYNN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) trades at 16.
8x forward P/E versus 104. 4x for DraftKings Inc. — 87. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FLUT: 103. 8% to $206. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — FLUT or CZR or DKNG or MGM or WYNN?
In this comparison, WYNN (1.
6% yield) pays a dividend. FLUT, CZR, DKNG, MGM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FLUT or CZR or DKNG or MGM or WYNN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
22), 1. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WYNN: +29. 9%, FLUT: -22. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FLUT and CZR and DKNG and MGM and WYNN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FLUT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CZR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MGM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WYNN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. WYNN pays a dividend while FLUT, CZR, DKNG, MGM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.