Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FLWS vs CAKE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
FLWS vs CAKE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $145M | $3.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.59B | $3.75B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-213M | $148M |
| Gross Margin | 37.6% | 78.3% |
| Operating Margin | -14.2% | 5.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.0x |
| Total Debt | $271M | $3.46B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $47M | $216M |
FLWS vs CAKE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, … (FLWS) | 100 | 17.8 | -82.2% |
| The Cheesecake Fact… (CAKE) | 100 | 282.2 | +182.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FLWS vs CAKE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FLWS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.28, current ratio 1.28x
CAKE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.11, yield 1.8%
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth -4.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.3%
- 37.3% 10Y total return vs FLWS's -47.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.7% revenue growth vs FLWS's -8.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.0% margin vs FLWS's -13.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.11 vs FLWS's 1.28 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.7% vs FLWS's -29.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs FLWS's -23.8%, ROIC 4.7% vs -27.7% |
FLWS vs CAKE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FLWS vs CAKE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAKE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAKE is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.8B annually — 2.4x FLWS's $1.6B. CAKE is the more profitable business, keeping 4.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FLWS's -13.4%. On growth, CAKE holds the edge at +4.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $3.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$172M | $296M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$213M | $148M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$39M | $155M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.6% | +78.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -14.2% | +5.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.4% | +4.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +4.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.5% | +4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.0% | -28.6% |
Valuation Metrics
FLWS leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $145M | $3.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $370M | $6.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.26x | 19.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 21.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.09x | 0.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.93x | 6.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 19.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CAKE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CAKE delivers a 37.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $-73 for FLWS. FLWS carries lower financial leverage with a 1.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CAKE's 7.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CAKE scores 6/9 vs FLWS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -73.4% | +37.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -23.8% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.7% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -29.1% | +7.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.01x | 7.93x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $225M | $3.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $47M | $216M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $271M | $3.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.93x | 16.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CAKE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CAKE five years ago would be worth $10,435 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,237 for FLWS. Over the past 12 months, CAKE leads with a +24.7% total return vs FLWS's -29.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAKE at 24.2% vs FLWS's -20.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.5% | +15.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -29.9% | +24.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.4% | +91.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.6% | +4.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.5% | +37.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.8% | +24.2% |
Risk & Volatility
CAKE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CAKE is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLWS's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAKE currently trades 87.0% from its 52-week high vs FLWS's 46.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.28x | 1.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.44 | $69.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.88 | $43.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +46.6% | +87.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.1 | 52.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 744K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FLWS as "Buy" and CAKE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 141.7% upside for FLWS (target: $10) vs 8.1% for CAKE (target: $66). CAKE is the only dividend payer here at 1.78% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.50 | $65.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.0% | +5.1% |
CAKE leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FLWS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
FLWS vs CAKE: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLWS or CAKE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (CAKE) is the stronger pick with 4.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 0% for 1-800-FLOWERS. COM, Inc. (FLWS). The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (CAKE) offers the better valuation at 19. 7x trailing P/E (15. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate 1-800-FLOWERS. COM, Inc. (FLWS) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FLWS or CAKE?
Over the past 5 years, The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (CAKE) delivered a total return of +4.
4%, compared to -87. 6% for 1-800-FLOWERS. COM, Inc. (FLWS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAKE returned +37. 3% versus FLWS's -47. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FLWS or CAKE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (CAKE) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
11β versus 1-800-FLOWERS. COM, Inc. 's 1. 28β — meaning FLWS is approximately 15% more volatile than CAKE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, 1-800-FLOWERS. COM, Inc. (FLWS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 101% versus 8% for The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — FLWS or CAKE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (CAKE) is pulling ahead at 4.
7% versus -8. 0% for 1-800-FLOWERS. COM, Inc. (FLWS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated grew EPS -4. 1% year-over-year, compared to -32. 1% for 1-800-FLOWERS. COM, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CAKE leads at 4. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FLWS or CAKE?
The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (CAKE) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
0% net margin versus -11. 9% for 1-800-FLOWERS. COM, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CAKE leads at 5. 0% versus -12. 2% for FLWS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CAKE leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FLWS or CAKE more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FLWS: 141.
7% to $9. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — FLWS or CAKE?
In this comparison, CAKE (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. FLWS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is FLWS or CAKE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (CAKE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
11), 1. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAKE: +37. 3%, FLWS: -47. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FLWS and CAKE?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
CAKE pays a dividend while FLWS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.