Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FLXS vs ETH vs LOVE vs HNI vs HOFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management - Cryptocurrency
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Business Equipment & Supplies
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
FLXS vs ETH vs LOVE vs HNI vs HOFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Asset Management - Cryptocurrency | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Business Equipment & Supplies | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $295M | $554M | $228M | $1.70B | $138M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $458M | $615M | $690M | $3.59B | $376M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $22M | $47M | $13M | $-15M | $-13M |
| Gross Margin | 23.2% | 60.5% | 57.7% | 39.9% | 22.4% |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | 10.1% | 6.3% | 4.6% | -4.8% |
| Forward P/E | 11.9x | 8.5x | 25.7x | 8.6x | — |
| Total Debt | $59M | $124M | $183M | $1.63B | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $40M | $76M | $84M | $209M | $6M |
FLXS vs ETH vs LOVE vs HNI vs HOFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS) | 100 | 145.3 | +45.3% |
| Grayscale Ethereum … (ETH) | 100 | 70.7 | -29.3% |
| The Lovesac Company (LOVE) | 100 | 57.1 | -42.9% |
| HNI Corporation (HNI) | 100 | 63.1 | -36.9% |
| Hooker Furnishings … (HOFT) | 100 | 84.2 | -15.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FLXS vs ETH vs LOVE vs HNI vs HOFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FLXS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 85.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.8%
- 51.4% 10Y total return vs HNI's 9.3%
- +80.1% vs LOVE's -23.5%
- 7.5% ROA vs HOFT's -4.6%, ROIC 9.9% vs -5.1%
ETH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.20 vs HNI's 3.40
- Better valuation composite
- 8.4% margin vs HOFT's -3.4%
Among these 5 stocks, LOVE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HNI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 12.4% revenue growth vs HOFT's -8.3%
HOFT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 7.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 34.4%, current ratio 3.53x
- Beta 0.73, yield 7.3%, current ratio 3.53x
- Beta 0.73 vs ETH's 2.91
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs HOFT's -8.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.4% margin vs HOFT's -3.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs ETH's 2.91 | |
| Dividends | 7.3% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs FLXS's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.1% vs LOVE's -23.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs HOFT's -4.6%, ROIC 9.9% vs -5.1% |
FLXS vs ETH vs LOVE vs HNI vs HOFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FLXS vs ETH vs LOVE vs HNI vs HOFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FLXS leads in 2 of 6 categories
ETH leads 1 • HOFT leads 1 • LOVE leads 0 • HNI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ETH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HNI is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.6B annually — 9.5x HOFT's $376M. ETH is the more profitable business, keeping 8.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HOFT's -3.4%. On growth, HNI holds the edge at +124.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $458M | $615M | $690M | $3.6B | $376M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $31M | $70M | $58M | $323M | -$9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $22M | $47M | $13M | -$15M | -$13M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $28M | $20M | -$11M | $8M | -$14M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.2% | +60.5% | +57.7% | +39.9% | +22.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +10.1% | +6.3% | +4.6% | -4.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +8.4% | +1.9% | -0.4% | -3.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +0.0% | -1.5% | +0.2% | -3.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.8% | — | +2.5% | +124.7% | -13.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.2% | -28.1% | -18.4% | -100.0% | -63.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ETH and HNI and HOFT each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.8x trailing earnings, ETH trades at a 65% valuation discount to HNI's 31.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ETH offers better value at 0.25x vs HNI's 12.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $295M | $554M | $228M | $1.7B | $138M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $314M | $602M | $327M | $3.1B | $202M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.54x | 10.84x | 22.64x | 31.26x | -10.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.90x | 8.55x | 25.68x | 8.57x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.25x | — | 12.39x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.38x | 9.71x | 11.54x | 9.01x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.67x | 0.90x | 0.34x | 0.60x | 0.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.87x | 1.16x | 1.21x | 0.92x | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.74x | 9999.00x | 13.06x | 8.06x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-7 for HOFT. ETH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HNI's 0.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs HOFT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.2% | +10.0% | +6.5% | -1.2% | -6.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.5% | +6.4% | +2.6% | -0.5% | -4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.9% | +7.6% | +3.3% | +7.8% | -5.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.3% | +10.5% | +3.6% | +9.3% | -6.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 0.26x | 0.85x | 0.89x | 0.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $19M | $47M | $99M | $1.4B | $64M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $40M | $76M | $84M | $209M | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $59M | $124M | $183M | $1.6B | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 380.21x | 721.00x | — | 2.01x | -13.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLXS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLXS five years ago would be worth $11,954 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,157 for LOVE. Over the past 12 months, FLXS leads with a +80.1% total return vs LOVE's -23.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 50.7% vs LOVE's -15.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +38.7% | -26.1% | +8.2% | -17.7% | +16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +80.1% | +28.9% | -23.5% | -17.7% | +57.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +242.4% | -33.4% | -40.1% | +42.6% | +1.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.5% | -30.3% | -78.4% | -7.3% | -56.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.4% | -18.8% | -34.9% | +9.3% | -20.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +50.7% | -12.7% | -15.7% | +12.5% | +0.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLXS and HOFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ETH's 2.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLXS currently trades 92.0% from its 52-week high vs ETH's 47.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.51x | 2.91x | 1.33x | 1.07x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $59.95 | $45.78 | $21.90 | $53.29 | $15.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.38 | $16.85 | $10.33 | $31.41 | $8.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.0% | +47.6% | +71.3% | +65.1% | +80.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.4 | 55.8 | 53.7 | 34.4 | 46.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 47K | 4.6M | 299K | 743K | 43K |
Analyst Outlook
HOFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ETH as "Hold", LOVE as "Buy", HNI as "Buy", HOFT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.8% upside for HNI (target: $95) vs -2.1% for FLXS (target: $54). For income investors, HOFT offers the higher dividend yield at 7.28% vs FLXS's 1.14%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $54.00 | — | $22.50 | $95.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 11 | 3 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +0.0% | — | +3.7% | +7.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.63 | $0.00 | — | $1.29 | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | 0.0% | +8.7% | +4.9% | 0.0% |
FLXS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ETH leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
FLXS vs ETH vs LOVE vs HNI vs HOFT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLXS or ETH or LOVE or HNI or HOFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HNI Corporation (HNI) is the stronger pick with 12.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 3% for Hooker Furnishings Corporation (HOFT). Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) offers the better valuation at 10. 8x trailing P/E (8. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Lovesac Company (LOVE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FLXS or ETH or LOVE or HNI or HOFT?
On trailing P/E, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the cheapest at 10.
8x versus HNI Corporation at 31. 3x. On forward P/E, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust is actually cheaper at 8. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust wins at 0. 20x versus HNI Corporation's 3. 40x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FLXS or ETH or LOVE or HNI or HOFT?
Over the past 5 years, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) delivered a total return of +19. 5%, compared to -78. 4% for The Lovesac Company (LOVE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLXS returned +51. 4% versus LOVE's -34. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FLXS or ETH or LOVE or HNI or HOFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hooker Furnishings Corporation (HOFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
73β versus Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust's 2. 91β — meaning ETH is approximately 297% more volatile than HOFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 89% for HNI Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FLXS or ETH or LOVE or HNI or HOFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HNI Corporation (HNI) is pulling ahead at 12.
4% versus -8. 3% for Hooker Furnishings Corporation (HOFT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flexsteel Industries, Inc. grew EPS 85. 9% year-over-year, compared to -236. 4% for Hooker Furnishings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LOVE leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FLXS or ETH or LOVE or HNI or HOFT?
Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
4% net margin versus -3. 1% for Hooker Furnishings Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ETH leads at 10. 1% versus -4. 6% for HOFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ETH leads at 60. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FLXS or ETH or LOVE or HNI or HOFT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 20x versus HNI Corporation's 3. 40x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) trades at 8. 5x forward P/E versus 25. 7x for The Lovesac Company — 17. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HNI: 173. 8% to $95. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FLXS or ETH or LOVE or HNI or HOFT?
In this comparison, HOFT (7.
3% yield), HNI (3. 7% yield), FLXS (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. ETH, LOVE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FLXS or ETH or LOVE or HNI or HOFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hooker Furnishings Corporation (HOFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
73), 7. 3% yield). Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) carries a higher beta of 2. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOFT: -20. 5%, ETH: -18. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FLXS and ETH and LOVE and HNI and HOFT?
These companies operate in different sectors (FLXS (Consumer Cyclical) and ETH (Financial Services) and LOVE (Consumer Cyclical) and HNI (Industrials) and HOFT (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock; ETH is a small-cap deep-value stock; LOVE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HNI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HOFT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. FLXS, HNI, HOFT pay a dividend while ETH, LOVE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.