Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FLXS vs LOVE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
FLXS vs LOVE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $294M | $230M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $458M | $690M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $22M | $13M |
| Gross Margin | 23.2% | 57.7% |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | 6.3% |
| Forward P/E | 11.9x | 25.9x |
| Total Debt | $59M | $183M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $40M | $84M |
FLXS vs LOVE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS) | 100 | 553.8 | +453.8% |
| The Lovesac Company (LOVE) | 100 | 86.2 | -13.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FLXS vs LOVE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FLXS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 85.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.8%
- 50.0% 10Y total return vs LOVE's -34.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.51, Low D/E 35.4%, current ratio 2.78x
LOVE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- beta 1.33
- Beta 1.33, current ratio 1.59x
- Beta 1.33 vs FLXS's 1.51
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.9% revenue growth vs LOVE's -2.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.9x vs 25.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.8% margin vs LOVE's 1.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.33 vs FLXS's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +79.7% vs LOVE's -23.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs LOVE's 2.6%, ROIC 9.9% vs 3.3% |
FLXS vs LOVE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FLXS vs LOVE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FLXS and LOVE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LOVE is the larger business by revenue, generating $690M annually — 1.5x FLXS's $458M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 4.8% (FLXS) to 1.9% (LOVE). On growth, FLXS holds the edge at +9.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $458M | $690M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $31M | $58M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $22M | $13M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $28M | -$11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.2% | +57.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +6.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +1.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | -1.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.8% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.2% | -18.4% |
Valuation Metrics
FLXS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, FLXS trades at a 32% valuation discount to LOVE's 22.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FLXS's 10.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LOVE's 11.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $294M | $230M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $313M | $330M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.49x | 22.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.86x | 25.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.35x | 11.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.67x | 0.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.86x | 1.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.72x | 13.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $7 for LOVE. FLXS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LOVE's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs LOVE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.2% | +6.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.5% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.9% | +3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.3% | +3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 0.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $19M | $99M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $40M | $84M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $59M | $183M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 380.21x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLXS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLXS five years ago would be worth $12,230 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,300 for LOVE. Over the past 12 months, FLXS leads with a +79.7% total return vs LOVE's -23.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 50.6% vs LOVE's -15.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +38.3% | +9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +79.7% | -23.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +241.4% | -39.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.3% | -77.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.0% | -34.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +50.6% | -15.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLXS and LOVE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LOVE is the less volatile stock with a 1.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLXS's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLXS currently trades 91.7% from its 52-week high vs LOVE's 72.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.51x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $59.95 | $21.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.38 | $10.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.7% | +72.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.2 | 51.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 47K | 299K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for LOVE (target: $23) vs -1.8% for FLXS (target: $54). FLXS is the only dividend payer here at 1.14% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $54.00 | $22.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.63 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +8.7% |
FLXS leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
FLXS vs LOVE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLXS or LOVE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the stronger pick with 6. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 8% for The Lovesac Company (LOVE). Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Lovesac Company (LOVE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FLXS or LOVE?
On trailing P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the cheapest at 15. 5x versus The Lovesac Company at 22. 9x. On forward P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FLXS or LOVE?
Over the past 5 years, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) delivered a total return of +22. 3%, compared to -77. 0% for The Lovesac Company (LOVE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLXS returned +50. 0% versus LOVE's -34. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FLXS or LOVE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Lovesac Company (LOVE) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
33β versus Flexsteel Industries, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning FLXS is approximately 14% more volatile than LOVE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 85% for The Lovesac Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FLXS or LOVE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is pulling ahead at 6. 9% versus -2. 8% for The Lovesac Company (LOVE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flexsteel Industries, Inc. grew EPS 85. 9% year-over-year, compared to -52. 4% for The Lovesac Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, LOVE leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FLXS or LOVE?
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 6% net margin versus 1. 7% for The Lovesac Company — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLXS leads at 6. 0% versus 2. 0% for LOVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LOVE leads at 58. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FLXS or LOVE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) trades at 11. 9x forward P/E versus 25. 9x for The Lovesac Company — 14. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LOVE: 42. 6% to $22. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — FLXS or LOVE?
In this comparison, FLXS (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. LOVE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FLXS or LOVE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FLXS: +50. 0%, LOVE: -34. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FLXS and LOVE?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock; LOVE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. FLXS pays a dividend while LOVE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.