Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FLYW vs ALKT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
FLYW vs ALKT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1.73B | $1.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $188.60B | $472M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $12.54B | $-50M |
| Gross Margin | 0.2% | 57.4% |
| Operating Margin | 5.7% | -9.3% |
| Forward P/E | 40.6x | 21.0x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $354M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $330M | $63M |
FLYW vs ALKT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flywire Corporation (FLYW) | 100 | 42.3 | -57.7% |
| Alkami Technology, … (ALKT) | 100 | 50.6 | -49.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FLYW vs ALKT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FLYW has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.
- -58.6% 10Y total return vs ALKT's -60.8%
- 6.6% margin vs ALKT's -10.6%
- +49.5% vs ALKT's -39.1%
ALKT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.30
- Rev growth 32.9%, EPS growth -12.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.30, Low D/E 97.7%, current ratio 2.09x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.9% revenue growth vs FLYW's 26.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.0x vs 40.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.6% margin vs ALKT's -10.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.30 vs FLYW's 1.32 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +49.5% vs ALKT's -39.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs ALKT's -5.9%, ROIC 2.1% vs -8.6% |
FLYW vs ALKT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FLYW vs ALKT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 399.6x ALKT's $472M. FLYW is the more profitable business, keeping 6.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALKT's -10.6%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $188.6B | $472M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10.8B | -$12M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $12.5B | -$50M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15.8B | $44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +0.2% | +57.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | -9.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | -10.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.4% | +9.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1408.6% | +28.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.0% | -22.7% |
Valuation Metrics
FLYW leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $1.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 132.09x | -36.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 40.56x | 20.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 37.58x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.78x | 4.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.22x | 4.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.54x | 43.59x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FLYW leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLYW delivers a 5.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-14 for ALKT. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLYW scores 6/9 vs ALKT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.9% | -14.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | -5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.1% | -8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.3% | -9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.98x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$330M | $290M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $330M | $63M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $354M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.84x | -3.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLYW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLYW five years ago would be worth $4,140 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,945 for ALKT. Over the past 12 months, FLYW leads with a +49.5% total return vs ALKT's -39.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALKT at 11.4% vs FLYW's -20.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.5% | -25.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +49.5% | -39.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.5% | +38.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.6% | -60.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.6% | -60.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.4% | +11.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLYW and ALKT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALKT is the less volatile stock with a 1.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLYW's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLYW currently trades 95.3% from its 52-week high vs ALKT's 53.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.32x | 1.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.25 | $31.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.50 | $14.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.3% | +53.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.9 | 54.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FLYW as "Buy" and ALKT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.6% upside for ALKT (target: $22) vs 20.4% for FLYW (target: $18).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.50 | $22.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.5% | 0.0% |
FLYW leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
FLYW vs ALKT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLYW or ALKT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is the stronger pick with 32. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 26. 6% for Flywire Corporation (FLYW). Flywire Corporation (FLYW) offers the better valuation at 132. 1x trailing P/E (40. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Flywire Corporation (FLYW) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FLYW or ALKT?
On forward P/E, Alkami Technology, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 21. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FLYW or ALKT?
Over the past 5 years, Flywire Corporation (FLYW) delivered a total return of -58.
6%, compared to -60. 5% for Alkami Technology, Inc. (ALKT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLYW returned -58. 6% versus ALKT's -60. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FLYW or ALKT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 30β versus Flywire Corporation's 1. 32β — meaning FLYW is approximately 1% more volatile than ALKT relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — FLYW or ALKT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is pulling ahead at 32. 9% versus 26. 6% for Flywire Corporation (FLYW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to -12. 2% for Alkami Technology, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALKT leads at 29. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FLYW or ALKT?
Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is the more profitable company, earning 2.
2% net margin versus -10. 7% for Alkami Technology, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLYW leads at 1. 8% versus -12. 1% for ALKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLYW leads at 61. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FLYW or ALKT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) trades at 21. 0x forward P/E versus 40. 6x for Flywire Corporation — 19. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALKT: 30. 6% to $22. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FLYW or ALKT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is FLYW or ALKT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALKT: -60. 8%, FLYW: -58. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FLYW and ALKT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.