Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FLYW vs ALKT vs NCNO vs PAYO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
FLYW vs ALKT vs NCNO vs PAYO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $2.12B | $1.87B | $2.11B | $1.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $188.60B | $472M | $586M | $1.07B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $12.54B | $-50M | $-22M | $72M |
| Gross Margin | 0.2% | 57.4% | 60.1% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 5.7% | -9.3% | -0.8% | 11.7% |
| Forward P/E | 49.5x | 21.7x | 19.6x | 20.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $354M | $237M | $72M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $330M | $63M | $121M | $416M |
FLYW vs ALKT vs NCNO vs PAYO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flywire Corporation (FLYW) | 100 | 51.6 | -48.4% |
| Alkami Technology, … (ALKT) | 100 | 52.4 | -47.6% |
| nCino, Inc. (NCNO) | 100 | 29.1 | -70.9% |
| Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) | 100 | 50.6 | -49.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FLYW vs ALKT vs NCNO vs PAYO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FLYW has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in momentum and efficiency.
- +62.7% vs ALKT's -37.8%
- 4.3% ROA vs ALKT's -5.9%, ROIC 2.1% vs -8.6%
ALKT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 32.9%, EPS growth -12.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.5%
- Beta 1.30, current ratio 2.09x
- 32.9% revenue growth vs PAYO's 7.7%
NCNO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 1.18
- Lower volatility, beta 1.18, Low D/E 21.6%, current ratio 1.20x
- Lower P/E (19.6x vs 21.7x)
- Beta 1.18 vs PAYO's 1.65
PAYO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -47.7% 10Y total return vs FLYW's -49.5%
- 6.8% margin vs ALKT's -10.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.9% revenue growth vs PAYO's 7.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.6x vs 21.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.8% margin vs ALKT's -10.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.18 vs PAYO's 1.65 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.7% vs ALKT's -37.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs ALKT's -5.9%, ROIC 2.1% vs -8.6% |
FLYW vs ALKT vs NCNO vs PAYO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FLYW vs ALKT vs NCNO vs PAYO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PAYO leads in 2 of 6 categories
FLYW leads 1 • ALKT leads 0 • NCNO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAYO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 399.6x ALKT's $472M. PAYO is the more profitable business, keeping 6.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALKT's -10.6%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $188.6B | $472M | $586M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10.8B | -$12M | $27M | $208M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $12.5B | -$50M | -$22M | $72M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15.8B | $44M | $60M | $215M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +0.2% | +57.4% | +60.1% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | -9.3% | -0.8% | +11.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | -10.6% | -3.7% | +6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.4% | +9.4% | +10.2% | +20.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1408.6% | +28.9% | +9.6% | +6.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.0% | -22.7% | +2.3% | +20.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NCNO and PAYO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.6x trailing earnings, PAYO trades at a 83% valuation discount to FLYW's 161.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PAYO's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NCNO's 122.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $1.9B | $2.1B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $2.2B | $2.2B | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 161.18x | -37.89x | -53.88x | 26.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 49.50x | 21.69x | 19.64x | 20.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 47.80x | — | 121.97x | 7.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.40x | 4.20x | 3.89x | 1.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.71x | 5.00x | 1.87x | 2.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.41x | 45.09x | 39.45x | 8.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PAYO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PAYO delivers a 10.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-14 for ALKT. PAYO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALKT's 0.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLYW scores 6/9 vs ALKT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.9% | -14.0% | -2.1% | +10.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | -5.9% | -1.4% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.1% | -8.6% | -1.2% | +30.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.3% | -9.3% | -1.5% | +14.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.98x | 0.22x | 0.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$330M | $290M | $116M | -$343M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $330M | $63M | $121M | $416M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $354M | $237M | $72M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.84x | -3.73x | -0.51x | 17.23x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLYW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLYW five years ago would be worth $5,051 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,144 for NCNO. Over the past 12 months, FLYW leads with a +62.7% total return vs ALKT's -37.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALKT at 12.2% vs FLYW's -15.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.6% | -23.1% | -27.9% | -7.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +62.7% | -37.8% | -22.1% | -17.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.1% | +41.1% | -21.0% | -9.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.5% | -54.9% | -68.6% | -49.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.5% | -59.5% | -80.6% | -47.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.7% | +12.2% | -7.6% | -3.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLYW and NCNO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NCNO is the less volatile stock with a 1.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PAYO's 1.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLYW currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs NCNO's 52.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.32x | 1.30x | 1.18x | 1.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.05 | $31.66 | $33.92 | $7.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.79 | $14.11 | $13.80 | $4.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.2% | +55.1% | +52.4% | +66.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 83.0 | 50.9 | 50.1 | 45.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 1.9M | 2.7M | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FLYW as "Buy", ALKT as "Buy", NCNO as "Buy", PAYO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 81.8% upside for NCNO (target: $32) vs -1.3% for FLYW (target: $18).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.50 | $22.00 | $32.33 | $7.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 12 | 23 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +10.0% |
PAYO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FLYW leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
FLYW vs ALKT vs NCNO vs PAYO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLYW or ALKT or NCNO or PAYO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is the stronger pick with 32. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 7% for Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO). Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) offers the better valuation at 26. 6x trailing P/E (20. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Flywire Corporation (FLYW) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FLYW or ALKT or NCNO or PAYO?
On trailing P/E, Payoneer Global Inc.
(PAYO) is the cheapest at 26. 6x versus Flywire Corporation at 161. 2x. On forward P/E, nCino, Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FLYW or ALKT or NCNO or PAYO?
Over the past 5 years, Flywire Corporation (FLYW) delivered a total return of -49.
5%, compared to -68. 6% for nCino, Inc. (NCNO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PAYO returned -47. 7% versus NCNO's -80. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FLYW or ALKT or NCNO or PAYO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), nCino, Inc.
(NCNO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 18β versus Payoneer Global Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning PAYO is approximately 39% more volatile than NCNO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 98% for Alkami Technology, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FLYW or ALKT or NCNO or PAYO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is pulling ahead at 32. 9% versus 7. 7% for Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to -38. 7% for Payoneer Global Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALKT leads at 29. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FLYW or ALKT or NCNO or PAYO?
Payoneer Global Inc.
(PAYO) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 0% net margin versus -10. 7% for Alkami Technology, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PAYO leads at 11. 8% versus -12. 1% for ALKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PAYO leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FLYW or ALKT or NCNO or PAYO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, nCino, Inc.
(NCNO) trades at 19. 6x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for Flywire Corporation — 29. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NCNO: 81. 8% to $32. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — FLYW or ALKT or NCNO or PAYO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is FLYW or ALKT or NCNO or PAYO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, nCino, Inc.
(NCNO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 18)). Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NCNO: -80. 6%, PAYO: -47. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FLYW and ALKT and NCNO and PAYO?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALKT is a small-cap high-growth stock; NCNO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PAYO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.