Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FMAO vs FXNC vs CZWI vs HFWA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
FMAO vs FXNC vs CZWI vs HFWA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $380M | $253M | $203M | $932M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $189M | $112M | $90M | $336M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $33M | $18M | $14M | $68M |
| Gross Margin | 62.3% | 74.0% | 54.7% | 72.4% |
| Operating Margin | 22.5% | 19.6% | 7.0% | 23.2% |
| Forward P/E | 9.8x | 11.9x | 11.8x | 13.3x |
| Total Debt | $300M | $43M | $52M | $42M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $98M | $161M | $119M | $53M |
FMAO vs FXNC vs CZWI vs HFWA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmers & Merchants… (FMAO) | 100 | 128.2 | +28.2% |
| First National Corp… (FXNC) | 100 | 210.5 | +110.5% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 291.2 | +191.2% |
| Heritage Financial … (HFWA) | 100 | 144.8 | +44.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FMAO vs FXNC vs CZWI vs HFWA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FMAO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.72 vs FXNC's 7.95
- Lower P/E (9.8x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.72 vs 2.32
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FXNC's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FXNC's 0.5%
FXNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 2.2%
- Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 96.0%
- 241.1% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 157.0%
- NIM 3.6% vs CZWI's 2.9%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs FMAO's 1.04, lower leverage
HFWA is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 3.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs FXNC's 2.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.8x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.72 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FXNC's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs FMAO's 1.04, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs FXNC's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.9% vs FMAO's +15.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FXNC's 0.5% |
FMAO vs FXNC vs CZWI vs HFWA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FMAO vs FXNC vs CZWI vs HFWA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HFWA leads in 1 of 6 categories
FMAO leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • FXNC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HFWA leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HFWA is the larger business by revenue, generating $336M annually — 3.7x CZWI's $90M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 20.1% (HFWA) to 15.8% (FXNC).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $189M | $112M | $90M | $336M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $48M | $25M | $9M | $80M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $33M | $18M | $14M | $68M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $36M | $21M | $11M | $86M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.3% | +74.0% | +54.7% | +72.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.5% | +19.6% | +7.0% | +23.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.6% | +15.8% | +16.0% | +20.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | +18.7% | +11.5% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.4% | +7.1% | +63.0% | +85.7% |
Valuation Metrics
FMAO leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, FMAO trades at a 44% valuation discount to CZWI's 14.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FMAO offers better value at 0.60x vs FXNC's 9.55x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $380M | $253M | $203M | $932M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $583M | $134M | $136M | $922M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.11x | 14.27x | 14.44x | 13.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.81x | 11.87x | 11.78x | 13.33x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.60x | 9.55x | 2.85x | 1.60x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.70x | 6.13x | 15.28x | 11.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.01x | 2.25x | 2.25x | 2.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.02x | 1.35x | 1.09x | 1.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.99x | 12.03x | 19.55x | 10.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — FXNC and HFWA each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FXNC delivers a 10.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $8 for HFWA. HFWA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FMAO's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HFWA scores 9/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.3% | +10.0% | +7.8% | +7.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +0.9% | +0.8% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.9% | +7.7% | +2.0% | +5.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +9.9% | +0.6% | +4.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.81x | 0.23x | 0.28x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $202M | -$118M | -$67M | -$10M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $98M | $161M | $119M | $53M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $300M | $43M | $52M | $42M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.61x | 0.84x | 0.16x | 0.87x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $17,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,042 for HFWA. Over the past 12 months, FXNC leads with a +46.9% total return vs FMAO's +15.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs FMAO's 15.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.7% | +14.6% | +21.5% | +17.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.0% | +46.9% | +45.6% | +24.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.8% | +110.8% | +160.0% | +92.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.3% | +68.7% | +71.2% | +10.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +144.5% | +241.1% | +157.0% | +109.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.2% | +28.2% | +37.5% | +24.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CZWI and HFWA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FMAO's 1.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.98x | 0.68x | 0.46x | 0.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.79 | $29.85 | $22.62 | $28.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.59 | $18.31 | $12.83 | $21.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.9% | +93.7% | +93.2% | +94.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.8 | 47.6 | 63.7 | 54.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 54K | 80K | 40K | 289K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FXNC and HFWA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FMAO as "Hold", FXNC as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", HFWA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.3% upside for HFWA (target: $31) vs -24.9% for FXNC (target: $21). For income investors, HFWA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.46% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.50 | $21.00 | — | $31.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 1 | 2 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | +2.2% | +1.8% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 11 | 7 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.88 | $0.61 | $0.37 | $0.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +0.1% | +3.1% | +0.6% |
HFWA leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FMAO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
FMAO vs FXNC vs CZWI vs HFWA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FMAO or FXNC or CZWI or HFWA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger pick with 27.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (FMAO) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First National Corporation (FXNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FMAO or FXNC or CZWI or HFWA?
On trailing P/E, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.
(FMAO) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. wins at 0. 72x versus First National Corporation's 7. 95x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FMAO or FXNC or CZWI or HFWA?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +71. 2%, compared to +10. 4% for Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FXNC returned +241. 1% versus HFWA's +110. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FMAO or FXNC or CZWI or HFWA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 98β — meaning FMAO is approximately 114% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 81% for Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FMAO or FXNC or CZWI or HFWA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First National Corporation (FXNC) is pulling ahead at 27.
1% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First National Corporation grew EPS 96. 0% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FMAO or FXNC or CZWI or HFWA?
Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
1% net margin versus 15. 8% for First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HFWA leads at 23. 2% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FXNC leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FMAO or FXNC or CZWI or HFWA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (FMAO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 72x versus First National Corporation's 7. 95x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (FMAO) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 13. 3x for Heritage Financial Corporation — 3. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HFWA: 14. 3% to $31. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — FMAO or FXNC or CZWI or HFWA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is FMAO or FXNC or CZWI or HFWA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, HFWA: +110. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FMAO and FXNC and CZWI and HFWA?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FMAO is a small-cap deep-value stock; FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; HFWA is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.