Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FMAO vs HFWA vs FFIN vs FBIZ vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
FMAO vs HFWA vs FFIN vs FBIZ vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $380M | $932M | $4.61B | $473M | $24.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $189M | $336M | $739M | $279M | $10.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $33M | $68M | $243M | $51M | $382M |
| Gross Margin | 62.3% | 72.4% | 70.8% | 57.3% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | 22.5% | 23.2% | 36.8% | 21.6% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 9.8x | 13.3x | 15.9x | 9.1x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $300M | $42M | $197M | $259M | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $98M | $53M | $763M | $31M | $599M |
FMAO vs HFWA vs FFIN vs FBIZ vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmers & Merchants… (FMAO) | 100 | 127.3 | +27.3% |
| Heritage Financial … (HFWA) | 100 | 144.3 | +44.3% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
| First Business Fina… (FBIZ) | 100 | 342.7 | +242.7% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FMAO vs HFWA vs FFIN vs FBIZ vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FMAO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 7.1%, EPS growth 79.5%
HFWA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and momentum is your priority.
- 3.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs FBIZ's 2.1%
- +24.5% vs FIS's -35.3%
FFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs FIS's 5.4%
- 30.2% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
- 1.6% ROA vs HFWA's 1.0%, ROIC 11.0% vs 5.2%
FBIZ is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 161.7% 10Y total return vs FMAO's 144.5%
- NIM 3.3% vs FMAO's 3.0%
FIS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 0.59x
- PEG 0.31 vs FFIN's 3.05
- Beta 0.76, yield 3.5%, current ratio 0.59x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs FIS's 5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 15.9x), PEG 0.31 vs 3.05 | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.2% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs FMAO's 1.04, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs FBIZ's 2.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.5% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.6% ROA vs HFWA's 1.0%, ROIC 11.0% vs 5.2% |
FMAO vs HFWA vs FFIN vs FBIZ vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FMAO vs HFWA vs FFIN vs FBIZ vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
FBIZ leads 2 • FMAO leads 0 • HFWA leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 57.6x FMAO's $189M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $189M | $336M | $739M | $279M | $10.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $48M | $80M | $310M | $49M | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $33M | $68M | $243M | $51M | $382M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $36M | $86M | $290M | $53M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.3% | +72.4% | +70.8% | +57.3% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.5% | +23.2% | +36.8% | +21.6% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.6% | +20.1% | +30.2% | +18.0% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | +25.5% | +39.6% | +21.9% | +26.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.4% | +85.7% | -7.7% | +12.9% | +92.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FBIZ leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, FMAO trades at a 87% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FBIZ offers better value at 0.37x vs FFIN's 3.98x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $380M | $932M | $4.6B | $473M | $24.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $583M | $922M | $4.0B | $702M | $27.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.11x | 13.99x | 20.76x | 9.36x | 63.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.81x | 13.33x | 15.92x | 9.15x | 7.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.60x | 1.60x | 3.98x | 0.37x | 2.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.70x | 11.58x | 14.17x | 11.61x | 7.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.01x | 2.77x | 6.23x | 1.69x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.02x | 1.02x | 2.89x | 1.25x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.99x | 10.88x | 15.73x | 7.74x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FBIZ delivers a 14.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. HFWA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FMAO's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HFWA scores 9/9 vs FIS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.3% | +7.5% | +13.3% | +14.1% | +2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +1.0% | +1.6% | +1.2% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.9% | +5.2% | +11.0% | +7.0% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +4.1% | +16.0% | +2.6% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.81x | 0.05x | 0.12x | 0.70x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $202M | -$10M | -$566M | $229M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $98M | $53M | $763M | $31M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $300M | $42M | $197M | $259M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.61x | 0.87x | 1.48x | 0.42x | 4.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FBIZ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FBIZ five years ago would be worth $23,086 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, HFWA leads with a +24.5% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FBIZ at 33.2% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.7% | +17.7% | +8.5% | +7.1% | -27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.0% | +24.5% | -3.2% | +21.0% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.8% | +92.4% | +29.1% | +136.5% | -6.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.3% | +10.4% | -28.2% | +130.9% | -63.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +144.5% | +109.7% | +145.4% | +161.7% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.2% | +24.4% | +8.9% | +33.2% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HFWA and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FIS is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FMAO's 1.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HFWA currently trades 94.9% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 0.97x | 0.95x | 0.81x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.79 | $28.90 | $38.74 | $60.54 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.59 | $21.32 | $28.11 | $45.90 | $43.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.9% | +94.9% | +83.6% | +93.7% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.8 | 54.6 | 58.2 | 49.1 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 54K | 289K | 740K | 39K | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HFWA and FBIZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FMAO as "Hold", HFWA as "Buy", FFIN as "Hold", FBIZ as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs 3.0% for FMAO (target: $29). For income investors, HFWA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.46% vs FBIZ's 2.09%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.50 | $31.33 | $39.25 | $67.00 | $67.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 14 | 15 | 10 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | +3.5% | +2.2% | +2.1% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 11 | 13 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.88 | $0.95 | $0.72 | $1.19 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +0.6% | 0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% |
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FBIZ leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
FMAO vs HFWA vs FFIN vs FBIZ vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FMAO or HFWA or FFIN or FBIZ or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (FMAO) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FMAO or HFWA or FFIN or FBIZ or FIS?
On trailing P/E, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.
(FMAO) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 05x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FMAO or HFWA or FFIN or FBIZ or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) delivered a total return of +130. 9%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FBIZ returned +161. 7% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FMAO or HFWA or FFIN or FBIZ or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 04β — meaning FMAO is approximately 37% more volatile than FIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 81% for Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FMAO or HFWA or FFIN or FBIZ or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus 5. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 79. 5% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FMAO or HFWA or FFIN or FBIZ or FIS?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HFWA leads at 72. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FMAO or HFWA or FFIN or FBIZ or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 05x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 8. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — FMAO or HFWA or FFIN or FBIZ or FIS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 2. 1% for First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ).
09Is FMAO or HFWA or FFIN or FBIZ or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 2. 1% yield, +161. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FBIZ: +161. 7%, FMAO: +144. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FMAO and HFWA and FFIN and FBIZ and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (FMAO (Financial Services) and HFWA (Financial Services) and FFIN (Financial Services) and FBIZ (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FMAO is a small-cap deep-value stock; HFWA is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; FBIZ is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.