Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FNGR vs BIDU vs GOOGL vs CLPS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FNGR
FingerMotion, Inc.

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$53M
5Y Perf.+82.2%
BIDU
Baidu, Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$48.92B
5Y Perf.+32.4%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.81T
5Y Perf.+459.0%
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$25M
5Y Perf.-51.9%

FNGR vs BIDU vs GOOGL vs CLPS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FNGR logoFNGR
BIDU logoBIDU
GOOGL logoGOOGL
CLPS logoCLPS
IndustryTelecommunications ServicesInternet Content & InformationInternet Content & InformationInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$53M$48.92B$4.81T$25M
Revenue (TTM)$33M$130.46B$422.57B$299M
Net Income (TTM)$-5M$9.00B$160.21B$-4M
Gross Margin5.0%44.7%60.4%22.8%
Operating Margin-18.6%-2.6%32.7%-1.4%
Forward P/E2.6x29.6x
Total Debt$1M$79.32B$59.29B$34M
Cash & Equiv.$1M$24.83B$30.71B$28M

FNGR vs BIDU vs GOOGL vs CLPSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FNGR
BIDU
GOOGL
CLPS
StockMay 20May 26Return
FingerMotion, Inc. (FNGR)100182.2+82.2%
Baidu, Inc. (BIDU)100132.4+32.4%
Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL)100559.0+459.0%
CLPS Incorporation (CLPS)10048.1-51.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FNGR vs BIDU vs GOOGL vs CLPS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GOOGL and CLPS are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. CLPS Incorporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. BIDU also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FNGR
FingerMotion, Inc.
The Secondary Option

FNGR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: communication services exposure
BIDU
Baidu, Inc.
The Value Pick

BIDU is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.04 vs GOOGL's 0.99
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: valuation efficiency
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
The Growth Play

GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 34.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.5%
  • 10.0% 10Y total return vs BIDU's -17.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 14.3%, current ratio 2.01x
  • 37.9% margin vs FNGR's -16.1%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
The Income Pick

CLPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
  • Beta 0.27, yield 14.6%, current ratio 1.58x
  • 15.2% revenue growth vs BIDU's -1.1%
  • Beta 0.27 vs FNGR's 1.78
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCLPS logoCLPS15.2% revenue growth vs BIDU's -1.1%
ValueBIDU logoBIDUBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsGOOGL logoGOOGL37.9% margin vs FNGR's -16.1%
Stability / SafetyCLPS logoCLPSBeta 0.27 vs FNGR's 1.78
DividendsCLPS logoCLPS14.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs GOOGL's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)GOOGL logoGOOGL+163.5% vs FNGR's -72.8%
Efficiency (ROA)GOOGL logoGOOGL27.4% ROA vs FNGR's -8.9%, ROIC 25.1% vs -37.2%

FNGR vs BIDU vs GOOGL vs CLPS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FNGRFingerMotion, Inc.
FY 2025
SMS And MMS
100.7%$8M
Big Data
-0.7%$-58,209
BIDUBaidu, Inc.
FY 2023
Online Marketing Services
60.3%$81.2B
Product and Service, Other
39.7%$53.4B
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.
FY 2025
Google Search & Other
55.7%$224.5B
Google Cloud
14.6%$58.7B
Google Inc.
11.9%$48.0B
YouTube Advertising Revenue
10.0%$40.4B
Google Network
7.4%$29.8B
Other Bets
0.4%$1.5B
Other Segments
-0.0%$-127,000,000
CLPSCLPS Incorporation
FY 2025
Other Member
100.0%$894,598

FNGR vs BIDU vs GOOGL vs CLPS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLGOOGLLAGGINGFNGR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

GOOGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 12749.6x FNGR's $33M. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FNGR's -16.1%. On growth, GOOGL holds the edge at +21.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFNGR logoFNGRFingerMotion, Inc.BIDU logoBIDUBaidu, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.CLPS logoCLPSCLPS Incorporation
RevenueTrailing 12 months$33M$130.5B$422.6B$299M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$6M$4.9B$161.3B-$1M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$5M$9.0B$160.2B-$4M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$7M-$15.7B$73.3B$0
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+5.0%+44.7%+60.4%+22.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-18.6%-2.6%+32.7%-1.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-16.1%+6.9%+37.9%-1.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-21.8%-12.0%+17.3%-2.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-32.1%-7.1%+21.8%+15.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.3%-2.6%+81.9%+75.8%
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BIDU leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 14.4x trailing earnings, BIDU trades at a 61% valuation discount to GOOGL's 36.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BIDU offers better value at 0.24x vs GOOGL's 1.23x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFNGR logoFNGRFingerMotion, Inc.BIDU logoBIDUBaidu, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.CLPS logoCLPSCLPS Incorporation
Market CapShares × price$53M$48.9B$4.81T$25M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$53M$56.9B$4.84T$31M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-8.97x14.44x36.82x-3.48x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.2.60x29.61x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.24x1.23x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.79x32.22x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.48x2.50x11.95x0.15x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.36x1.17x11.72x0.43x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF25.41x65.72x
BIDU leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-33 for FNGR. FNGR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLPS's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOGL scores 7/9 vs FNGR's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFNGR logoFNGRFingerMotion, Inc.BIDU logoBIDUBaidu, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.CLPS logoCLPSCLPS Incorporation
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-32.6%+3.1%+39.0%-6.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-8.9%+2.0%+27.4%-3.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-37.2%+4.8%+25.1%-7.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-46.9%+6.3%+30.3%-9.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–91572
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.09x0.28x0.14x0.59x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$132,404$54.5B$28.6B$6M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1M$24.8B$30.7B$28M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1M$79.3B$59.3B$34M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-36.26x9.71x392.15x
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,106 for FNGR. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +163.5% total return vs FNGR's -72.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs FNGR's -26.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFNGR logoFNGRFingerMotion, Inc.BIDU logoBIDUBaidu, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.CLPS logoCLPSCLPS Incorporation
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-35.3%-6.9%+26.4%-10.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-72.8%+61.3%+163.5%-5.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-60.7%+14.2%+270.8%+0.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-88.9%-27.0%+239.8%-69.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-62.6%-17.5%+996.1%-78.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-26.8%+4.5%+54.8%+0.2%
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — GOOGL and CLPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FNGR's 1.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs FNGR's 16.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFNGR logoFNGRFingerMotion, Inc.BIDU logoBIDUBaidu, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.CLPS logoCLPSCLPS Incorporation
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.60x1.50x1.28x0.27x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.20$165.30$400.10$1.88
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.81$81.17$147.84$0.80
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+16.5%+84.6%+99.5%+48.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10038.269.183.449.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded198K2.0M28.3M15K
Evenly matched — GOOGL and CLPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: BIDU as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.2% upside for BIDU (target: $154) vs 2.1% for GOOGL (target: $406). For income investors, CLPS offers the higher dividend yield at 14.60% vs GOOGL's 0.21%.

MetricFNGR logoFNGRFingerMotion, Inc.BIDU logoBIDUBaidu, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.CLPS logoCLPSCLPS Incorporation
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$154.11$406.28
# AnalystsCovering analysts5382
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%+14.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises323
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.82$0.13
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.9%+0.9%0.0%
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

GOOGL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BIDU leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallAlphabet Inc. (GOOGL)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FNGR vs BIDU vs GOOGL vs CLPS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FNGR or BIDU or GOOGL or CLPS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger pick with 15.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 1% for Baidu, Inc. (BIDU). Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (2. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) a "Buy" — based on 53 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FNGR or BIDU or GOOGL or CLPS?

On trailing P/E, Baidu, Inc.

(BIDU) is the cheapest at 14. 4x versus Alphabet Inc. at 36. 8x. On forward P/E, Baidu, Inc. is actually cheaper at 2. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Baidu, Inc. wins at 0. 04x versus Alphabet Inc. 's 0. 99x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FNGR or BIDU or GOOGL or CLPS?

Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.

(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to -88. 9% for FingerMotion, Inc. (FNGR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +1004% versus CLPS's -78. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FNGR or BIDU or GOOGL or CLPS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

27β versus FingerMotion, Inc. 's 1. 60β — meaning FNGR is approximately 490% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FingerMotion, Inc. (FNGR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 59% for CLPS Incorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FNGR or BIDU or GOOGL or CLPS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is pulling ahead at 15.

2% versus -1. 1% for Baidu, Inc. (BIDU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alphabet Inc. grew EPS 34. 5% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FNGR leads at 15. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FNGR or BIDU or GOOGL or CLPS?

Alphabet Inc.

(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus -14. 4% for FingerMotion, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus -16. 7% for FNGR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOOGL leads at 59. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FNGR or BIDU or GOOGL or CLPS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 04x versus Alphabet Inc. 's 0. 99x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) trades at 2. 6x forward P/E versus 29. 6x for Alphabet Inc. — 27. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BIDU: 10. 2% to $154. 11.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FNGR or BIDU or GOOGL or CLPS?

In this comparison, CLPS (14.

6% yield), GOOGL (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. FNGR, BIDU do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FNGR or BIDU or GOOGL or CLPS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

27), 14. 6% yield). FingerMotion, Inc. (FNGR) carries a higher beta of 1. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 5%, FNGR: -64. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FNGR and BIDU and GOOGL and CLPS?

These companies operate in different sectors (FNGR (Communication Services) and BIDU (Communication Services) and GOOGL (Communication Services) and CLPS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FNGR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BIDU is a mid-cap deep-value stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock. CLPS pays a dividend while FNGR, BIDU, GOOGL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FNGR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BIDU

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GOOGL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLPS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FNGR and BIDU and GOOGL and CLPS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FNGR: -32.1% · BIDU: -7.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.