HAS vs MAT

For growth investors, Hasbro, Inc.

(HAS) is the stronger pick with 13. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 6% for Mattel, Inc. (MAT). Mattel, Inc. (MAT) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Mattel, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 11. 5x.

Over the past 5 years, Hasbro, Inc.

(HAS) delivered a total return of +11. 4%, compared to -32. 3% for Mattel, Inc. (MAT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HAS returned +44. 8% versus MAT's -44. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hasbro, Inc.

(HAS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 16β versus Mattel, Inc. 's 1. 24β — meaning MAT is approximately 6% more volatile than HAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mattel, Inc. (MAT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 128% versus 6% for Hasbro, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hasbro, Inc.

(HAS) is pulling ahead at 13. 7% versus -0. 6% for Mattel, Inc. (MAT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mattel, Inc. grew EPS -21. 5% year-over-year, compared to -183. 6% for Hasbro, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MAT leads at -0. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Mattel, Inc.

(MAT) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 4% net margin versus -6. 9% for Hasbro, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HAS leads at 22. 5% versus 11. 6% for MAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HAS leads at 70. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Mattel, Inc.

(MAT) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 16. 8x for Hasbro, Inc. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MAT: 27. 9% to $19. 29.

In this comparison, HAS (2.

9% yield) pays a dividend. MAT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hasbro, Inc.

(HAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 16), 2. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HAS: +44. 8%, MAT: -44. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: HAS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MAT is a small-cap deep-value stock. HAS pays a dividend while MAT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.