Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FOFO vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FOFO
Hang Feng Technology Innovation Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$17M
5Y Perf.-27.7%
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.

Construction Materials

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$336K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
PESI
Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.

Waste Management

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$204M
5Y Perf.+96.2%
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$27M
5Y Perf.-49.2%
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

Waste Management

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.32B
5Y Perf.+66.6%

FOFO vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FOFO logoFOFO
RETO logoRETO
PESI logoPESI
CLPS logoCLPS
CWST logoCWST
IndustryAsset ManagementConstruction MaterialsWaste ManagementInformation Technology ServicesWaste Management
Market Cap$17M$336K$204M$27M$5.32B
Revenue (TTM)$2M$9M$59M$299M$1.88B
Net Income (TTM)$611K$-25M$-18M$-4M$7M
Gross Margin100.0%14.0%4.1%22.8%17.4%
Operating Margin35.7%-237.8%-26.3%-1.4%4.5%
Forward P/E62.3x
Total Debt$0.00$110K$4M$34M$1.24B
Cash & Equiv.$3M$671K$12M$28M$124M

FOFO vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWSTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FOFO
RETO
PESI
CLPS
CWST
StockMay 20May 26Return
ReTo Eco-Solutions,… (RETO)1000.0-100.0%
Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI)100196.2+96.2%
CLPS Incorporation (CLPS)10050.8-49.2%
Casella Waste Syste… (CWST)100166.6+66.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FOFO vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FOFO leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. CLPS Incorporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. PESI also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FOFO
Hang Feng Technology Innovation Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares
The Banking Pick

FOFO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 16.0%, EPS growth 100.0%
  • 16.0% NII/revenue growth vs RETO's -43.5%
  • Better valuation composite
  • 30.1% margin vs RETO's -291.9%
Best for: growth exposure
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.
The Basic Materials Pick

RETO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: basic materials exposure
PESI
Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

PESI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +16.1% vs RETO's -96.3%
Best for: momentum
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
The Income Pick

CLPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.19, yield 13.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.19, Low D/E 58.8%, current ratio 1.58x
  • Beta 0.19, yield 13.9%, current ratio 1.58x
  • Beta 0.19 vs RETO's 1.75
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CWST is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 10.9% 10Y total return vs PESI's 194.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFOFO logoFOFO16.0% NII/revenue growth vs RETO's -43.5%
ValueFOFO logoFOFOBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsFOFO logoFOFO30.1% margin vs RETO's -291.9%
Stability / SafetyCLPS logoCLPSBeta 0.19 vs RETO's 1.75
DividendsCLPS logoCLPS13.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PESI logoPESI+16.1% vs RETO's -96.3%
Efficiency (ROA)FOFO logoFOFO18.5% ROA vs RETO's -75.1%, ROIC 85.7% vs -14.5%

FOFO vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FOFOHang Feng Technology Innovation Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

RETOReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.
FY 2024
Technology Equipment
100.0%$652,906
PESIPerma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Segments Total
50.0%$62M
Treatment
36.6%$45M
Services
13.4%$17M
CLPSCLPS Incorporation
FY 2025
Other Member
100.0%$894,598
CWSTCasella Waste Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Collection
74.3%$1.2B
Processing Services
8.9%$144M
Transfer
8.8%$143M
Landfill Revenue
6.1%$98M
Transportation
1.4%$23M
Landfill - Gas To Energy
0.5%$8M

FOFO vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFOFOLAGGINGCWST

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FOFO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

CWST is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 922.7x FOFO's $2M. FOFO is the more profitable business, keeping 30.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RETO's -2.9%. On growth, RETO holds the edge at +49.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFOFO logoFOFOHang Feng Technol…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2M$9M$59M$299M$1.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$19M-$14M-$1M$414M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$25M-$18M-$4M$7M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$7M-$18M$0$102M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+100.0%+14.0%+4.1%+22.8%+17.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+35.7%-2.4%-26.3%-1.4%+4.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+30.1%-2.9%-30.1%-1.3%+0.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+65.0%-77.8%-29.9%-2.3%+5.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+49.0%-20.1%+15.3%+9.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+98.8%-110.5%+75.8%-18.6%
FOFO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — FOFO and RETO and PESI and CLPS and CWST each lead in 1 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, CWST's 15.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FOFO's 19.4x.

MetricFOFO logoFOFOHang Feng Technol…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
Market CapShares × price$17M$335,867$204M$27M$5.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$14M-$225,888$196M$32M$6.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.04x-14.63x-3.65x707.33x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.62.29x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple19.35x15.66x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue8.24x0.18x3.30x0.16x2.89x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.01x4.04x0.45x3.44x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF12.67x62.75x
Evenly matched — FOFO and RETO and PESI and CLPS and CWST each lead in 1 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FOFO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

FOFO delivers a 96.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $96 in annual profit, vs $-183 for RETO. RETO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CWST's 0.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FOFO scores 7/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFOFO logoFOFOHang Feng Technol…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+96.1%-183.4%-34.5%-6.1%+0.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+18.5%-75.1%-20.2%-3.2%+0.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+85.7%-14.5%-21.7%-7.9%+2.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+114.2%-21.6%-16.7%-9.8%+2.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–975524
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.09x0.59x0.79x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$3M-$561,755-$7M$6M$1.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$3M$671,355$12M$28M$124M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$109,600$4M$34M$1.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-31.78x-42.14x1.12x
FOFO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PESI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PESI five years ago would be worth $15,279 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for RETO. Over the past 12 months, PESI leads with a +16.1% total return vs RETO's -96.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PESI at 2.4% vs RETO's -92.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFOFO logoFOFOHang Feng Technol…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-72.1%-68.0%-10.4%-5.9%-14.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-80.2%-96.3%+16.1%-6.9%-25.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-80.2%-99.9%+7.3%+4.4%-10.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-80.2%-100.0%+52.8%-67.1%+29.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-80.2%-100.0%+194.9%-77.7%+1088.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-41.8%-92.0%+2.4%+1.5%-3.5%
PESI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CLPS and CWST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RETO's 1.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWST currently trades 70.9% from its 52-week high vs RETO's 3.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFOFO logoFOFOHang Feng Technol…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.96x1.75x1.74x0.19x0.33x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$68.00$19.55$16.50$1.88$119.71
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.34$0.48$8.02$0.80$74.05
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+3.6%+3.1%+66.5%+50.5%+70.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10033.042.634.347.749.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded44K901K167K15K843K
Evenly matched — CLPS and CWST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: PESI as "Hold", CWST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.1% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs 32.3% for CWST (target: $112). CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 13.92% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricFOFO logoFOFOHang Feng Technol…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$18.00$112.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts119
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+13.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises131
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.13
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

FOFO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PESI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallHang Feng Technology Innova… (FOFO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FOFO vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FOFO or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Hang Feng Technology Innovation Co.

, Ltd. Ordinary Shares (FOFO) is the stronger pick with 1602% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 5% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) offers the better valuation at 707. 3x trailing P/E (62. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — FOFO or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?

Over the past 5 years, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.

(PESI) delivered a total return of +52. 8%, compared to -100. 0% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWST returned +1089% versus RETO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — FOFO or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

19β versus ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. 's 1. 75β — meaning RETO is approximately 800% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 79% for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — FOFO or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hang Feng Technology Innovation Co.

, Ltd. Ordinary Shares (FOFO) is pulling ahead at 1602% versus -43. 5% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hang Feng Technology Innovation Co. , Ltd. Ordinary Shares grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWST leads at 19. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — FOFO or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?

Hang Feng Technology Innovation Co.

, Ltd. Ordinary Shares (FOFO) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 1% net margin versus -456. 7% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FOFO leads at 35. 7% versus -225. 9% for RETO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FOFO leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is FOFO or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 64.

1% to $18. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — FOFO or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?

In this comparison, CLPS (13.

9% yield) pays a dividend. FOFO, RETO, PESI, CWST do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is FOFO or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

(CWST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), +1089% 10Y return). ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO) carries a higher beta of 1. 75 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWST: +1089%, RETO: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between FOFO and RETO and PESI and CLPS and CWST?

These companies operate in different sectors (FOFO (Financial Services) and RETO (Basic Materials) and PESI (Industrials) and CLPS (Technology) and CWST (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FOFO is a small-cap high-growth stock; RETO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CWST is a small-cap high-growth stock. CLPS pays a dividend while FOFO, RETO, PESI, CWST do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FOFO

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 800%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RETO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $20B
  • Revenue Growth > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PESI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLPS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CWST

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FOFO and RETO and PESI and CLPS and CWST on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FOFO: 1602.0% · RETO: 49.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.