Entertainment
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FOXA vs WBD vs DIS vs CMCSA vs NWSA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Telecommunications Services
Entertainment
FOXA vs WBD vs DIS vs CMCSA vs NWSA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment | Telecommunications Services | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $13.94B | $68.18B | $191.31B | $96.34B | $14.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16.58B | $37.30B | $97.26B | $125.28B | $8.85B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.89B | $727M | $11.22B | $18.60B | $1.08B |
| Gross Margin | 33.1% | 40.3% | 37.2% | 61.7% | 85.5% |
| Operating Margin | 19.0% | 2.5% | 15.5% | 15.3% | 12.1% |
| Forward P/E | 13.4x | 93.8x | 16.4x | 7.5x | 25.0x |
| Total Debt | $7.46B | $32.57B | $44.88B | $110.44B | $2.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5.35B | $4.57B | $5.70B | $9.48B | $2.40B |
FOXA vs WBD vs DIS vs CMCSA vs NWSA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fox Corporation (FOXA) | 100 | 213.3 | +113.3% |
| Warner Bros. Discov… (WBD) | 100 | 125.1 | +25.1% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 92.1 | -7.9% |
| Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) | 100 | 66.8 | -33.2% |
| News Corporation (NWSA) | 100 | 213.9 | +113.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FOXA vs WBD vs DIS vs CMCSA vs NWSA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FOXA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 16.6%, EPS growth 56.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, Low D/E 60.4%, current ratio 2.91x
- 16.6% revenue growth vs WBD's -5.1%
- 8.8% ROA vs WBD's 0.7%, ROIC 16.5% vs 1.5%
WBD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +222.7% vs CMCSA's -19.5%
DIS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CMCSA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 5.1%
- PEG 0.40 vs FOXA's 0.54
- Beta 0.21, yield 5.1%, current ratio 0.88x
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 25.0x)
NWSA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 122.0% 10Y total return vs FOXA's 29.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.6% revenue growth vs WBD's -5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 25.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.8% margin vs WBD's 1.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs WBD's 0.90 | |
| Dividends | 5.1% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs FOXA's 1.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +222.7% vs CMCSA's -19.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.8% ROA vs WBD's 0.7%, ROIC 16.5% vs 1.5% |
FOXA vs WBD vs DIS vs CMCSA vs NWSA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FOXA vs WBD vs DIS vs CMCSA vs NWSA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CMCSA leads in 2 of 6 categories
WBD leads 1 • FOXA leads 0 • DIS leads 0 • NWSA leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FOXA and NWSA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMCSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $125.3B annually — 14.2x NWSA's $8.9B. CMCSA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WBD's 1.9%. On growth, NWSA holds the edge at +15.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16.6B | $37.3B | $97.3B | $125.3B | $8.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.5B | $13.4B | $20.5B | $35.4B | $1.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.9B | $727M | $11.2B | $18.6B | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.5B | $3.1B | $7.1B | $18.1B | $652M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.1% | +40.3% | +37.2% | +61.7% | +85.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.0% | +2.5% | +15.5% | +15.3% | +12.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | +1.9% | +11.5% | +14.8% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +8.3% | +7.3% | +14.5% | +7.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.0% | -5.7% | +6.5% | +5.3% | +15.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.8% | +50.0% | -29.8% | -32.6% | -44.7% |
Valuation Metrics
CMCSA leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, CMCSA trades at a 95% valuation discount to WBD's 93.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CMCSA offers better value at 0.26x vs FOXA's 0.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13.9B | $68.2B | $191.3B | $96.3B | $14.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16.0B | $96.2B | $230.5B | $197.3B | $15.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.67x | 93.79x | 15.77x | 4.91x | 12.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.40x | — | 16.42x | 7.49x | 24.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.51x | — | — | 0.26x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.44x | 13.75x | 12.03x | 5.35x | 10.93x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.85x | 1.83x | 2.03x | 0.78x | 1.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.32x | 1.85x | 1.71x | 0.99x | 1.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.66x | 22.08x | 18.98x | 4.40x | 20.54x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — FOXA and NWSA each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CMCSA delivers a 19.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $2 for WBD. NWSA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMCSA's 1.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FOXA scores 8/9 vs WBD's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.0% | +2.0% | +9.8% | +19.5% | +11.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.8% | +0.7% | +5.6% | +6.9% | +7.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.5% | +1.5% | +6.9% | +8.2% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.4% | +1.5% | +8.5% | +8.9% | +7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.60x | 0.88x | 0.39x | 1.13x | 0.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.1B | $28.0B | $39.2B | $101.0B | $537M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.4B | $4.6B | $5.7B | $9.5B | $2.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.5B | $32.6B | $44.9B | $110.4B | $2.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.74x | 1.79x | 9.95x | 6.84x | 39.56x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WBD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FOXA five years ago would be worth $17,250 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,626 for CMCSA. Over the past 12 months, WBD leads with a +222.7% total return vs CMCSA's -19.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WBD at 26.4% vs CMCSA's -9.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.3% | -4.6% | -3.5% | -8.3% | +0.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +26.7% | +222.7% | +18.5% | -19.5% | -4.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.4% | +102.1% | +7.3% | -25.9% | +56.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.5% | -25.0% | -39.2% | -43.7% | +4.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.7% | -3.8% | +10.9% | +16.0% | +122.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.7% | +26.4% | +2.4% | -9.5% | +16.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WBD and CMCSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CMCSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WBD's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WBD currently trades 90.7% from its 52-week high vs CMCSA's 72.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | 0.90x | 0.90x | 0.21x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $76.39 | $30.00 | $124.69 | $36.66 | $31.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $48.89 | $8.06 | $91.00 | $25.75 | $22.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.4% | +90.7% | +86.6% | +72.1% | +82.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.3 | 50.0 | 45.7 | 37.9 | 48.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.4M | 22.4M | 9.0M | 28.4M | 4.1M |
Analyst Outlook
CMCSA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FOXA as "Hold", WBD as "Hold", DIS as "Buy", CMCSA as "Buy", NWSA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.2% upside for DIS (target: $140) vs 10.1% for WBD (target: $30). For income investors, CMCSA offers the higher dividend yield at 5.09% vs DIS's 0.92%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $70.17 | $29.94 | $139.50 | $31.87 | $32.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 48 | 32 | 63 | 60 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | — | +0.9% | +5.1% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.60 | — | $1.00 | $1.35 | $0.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.2% | 0.0% | +1.8% | +7.4% | +1.0% |
CMCSA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). WBD leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
FOXA vs WBD vs DIS vs CMCSA vs NWSA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FOXA or WBD or DIS or CMCSA or NWSA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Fox Corporation (FOXA) is the stronger pick with 16.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Walt Disney Company (DIS) a "Buy" — based on 63 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FOXA or WBD or DIS or CMCSA or NWSA?
On trailing P/E, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the cheapest at 4.
9x versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. at 93. 8x. On forward P/E, Comcast Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Comcast Corporation wins at 0. 40x versus Fox Corporation's 0. 54x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FOXA or WBD or DIS or CMCSA or NWSA?
Over the past 5 years, Fox Corporation (FOXA) delivered a total return of +72.
5%, compared to -43. 7% for Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NWSA returned +122. 0% versus WBD's -3. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FOXA or WBD or DIS or CMCSA or NWSA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
21β versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. 's 0. 90β — meaning WBD is approximately 331% more volatile than CMCSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, News Corporation (NWSA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 113% for Comcast Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FOXA or WBD or DIS or CMCSA or NWSA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fox Corporation (FOXA) is pulling ahead at 16.
6% versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: News Corporation grew EPS 350. 0% year-over-year, compared to 30. 2% for Comcast Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FOXA leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FOXA or WBD or DIS or CMCSA or NWSA?
Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
0% net margin versus 1. 9% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FOXA leads at 19. 8% versus 3. 5% for WBD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NWSA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FOXA or WBD or DIS or CMCSA or NWSA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 40x versus Fox Corporation's 0. 54x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 25. 0x for News Corporation — 17. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DIS: 29. 2% to $139. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — FOXA or WBD or DIS or CMCSA or NWSA?
In this comparison, CMCSA (5.
1% yield), NWSA (1. 2% yield), FOXA (1. 0% yield), DIS (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. WBD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FOXA or WBD or DIS or CMCSA or NWSA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
21), 5. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMCSA: +16. 0%, WBD: -3. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FOXA and WBD and DIS and CMCSA and NWSA?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FOXA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; WBD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CMCSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; NWSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock. FOXA, DIS, CMCSA, NWSA pay a dividend while WBD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.