REIT - Industrial
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FR vs PLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
FR vs PLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $8.29B | $132.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $744M | $8.74B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $342M | $3.21B |
| Gross Margin | 47.0% | 67.7% |
| Operating Margin | 38.3% | 47.0% |
| Forward P/E | 29.9x | 41.6x |
| Total Debt | $2.57B | $31.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $78M | $1.32B |
FR vs PLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Industrial Re… (FR) | 100 | 165.0 | +65.0% |
| Prologis, Inc. (PLD) | 100 | 156.2 | +56.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FR vs PLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.68, yield 2.8%
- Rev growth 8.6%, EPS growth -13.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.68, Low D/E 93.3%, current ratio 1.14x
PLD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 265.6% 10Y total return vs FR's 206.5%
- PEG 3.84 vs FR's 7.29
- PEG 3.84 vs 7.29
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.6% FFO/revenue growth vs PLD's 2.2% | |
| Value | PEG 3.84 vs 7.29 | |
| Quality / Margins | 46.0% margin vs PLD's 36.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs PLD's 0.73 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs PLD's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.7% vs FR's +32.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs PLD's 3.3%, ROIC 4.5% vs 3.8% |
FR vs PLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FR vs PLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLD is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.7B annually — 11.7x FR's $744M. FR is the more profitable business, keeping 46.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLD's 36.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $744M | $8.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $477M | $6.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $342M | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $483M | $5.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.0% | +67.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +38.3% | +47.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +46.0% | +36.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +64.9% | +59.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.9% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.0% | -24.1% |
Valuation Metrics
FR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 33.4x trailing earnings, FR trades at a 6% valuation discount to PLD's 35.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PLD offers better value at 3.30x vs FR's 8.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.3B | $132.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.8B | $162.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 33.43x | 35.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 29.87x | 41.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 8.16x | 3.30x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.87x | 23.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.40x | 16.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.00x | 2.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 72.14x | 27.02x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FR leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FR delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $6 for PLD. PLD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FR's 0.93x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.4% | +5.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.1% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.5% | +3.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.1% | +4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.93x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.5B | $30.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $78M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.6B | $31.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.27x | 5.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — FR and PLD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FR five years ago would be worth $14,211 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,980 for PLD. Over the past 12 months, PLD leads with a +40.7% total return vs FR's +32.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FR at 7.5% vs PLD's 6.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.8% | +11.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.5% | +40.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.3% | +21.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.1% | +39.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +206.5% | +265.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.5% | +6.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FR and PLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FR is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLD's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.68x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $64.62 | $145.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $47.36 | $103.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.8% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.2 | 53.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 925K | 3.1M |
Analyst Outlook
FR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FR as "Buy" and PLD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.0% upside for FR (target: $65) vs 1.1% for PLD (target: $144). For income investors, FR offers the higher dividend yield at 2.79% vs PLD's 2.62%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $65.00 | $144.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.75 | $3.74 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.0% |
FR leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
FR vs PLD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FR or PLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.
(FR) is the stronger pick with 8. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 2% for Prologis, Inc. (PLD). First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (FR) offers the better valuation at 33. 4x trailing P/E (29. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (FR) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FR or PLD?
On trailing P/E, First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.
(FR) is the cheapest at 33. 4x versus Prologis, Inc. at 35. 6x. On forward P/E, First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. is actually cheaper at 29. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Prologis, Inc. wins at 3. 84x versus First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. 's 7. 29x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FR or PLD?
Over the past 5 years, First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.
(FR) delivered a total return of +42. 1%, compared to +39. 8% for Prologis, Inc. (PLD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLD returned +265. 6% versus FR's +206. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FR or PLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.
(FR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 68β versus Prologis, Inc. 's 0. 73β — meaning PLD is approximately 8% more volatile than FR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Prologis, Inc. (PLD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 93% for First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FR or PLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.
(FR) is pulling ahead at 8. 6% versus 2. 2% for Prologis, Inc. (PLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Prologis, Inc. grew EPS 21. 9% year-over-year, compared to -13. 8% for First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLD leads at 19. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FR or PLD?
Prologis, Inc.
(PLD) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 5% net margin versus 34. 0% for First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLD leads at 53. 8% versus 42. 3% for FR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLD leads at 74. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FR or PLD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Prologis, Inc. (PLD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 84x versus First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. 's 7. 29x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (FR) trades at 29. 9x forward P/E versus 41. 6x for Prologis, Inc. — 11. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FR: 4. 0% to $65. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FR or PLD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (FR) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 2. 6% for Prologis, Inc. (PLD).
09Is FR or PLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.
(FR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 68), 2. 8% yield, +206. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FR: +206. 5%, PLD: +265. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FR and PLD?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.