Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FRBA vs MNSB vs NBTB vs FXNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
FRBA vs MNSB vs NBTB vs FXNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $388M | $176M | $2.35B | $253M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $247M | $136M | $867M | $112M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $44M | $16M | $169M | $18M |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | 54.4% | 72.1% | 74.0% |
| Operating Margin | 23.2% | 14.0% | 25.3% | 19.6% |
| Forward P/E | 9.1x | 10.4x | 10.8x | 11.7x |
| Total Debt | $271M | $70M | $327M | $43M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $302M | $25M | $185M | $161M |
FRBA vs MNSB vs NBTB vs FXNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Bank (FRBA) | 100 | 206.4 | +106.4% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 177.2 | +77.2% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| First National Corp… (FXNC) | 100 | 210.5 | +110.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FRBA vs MNSB vs NBTB vs FXNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FRBA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.73 vs FXNC's 7.87
- Lower P/E (9.1x vs 11.7x), PEG 0.73 vs 7.87
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FXNC's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FXNC's 0.5%
MNSB is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.66 vs NBTB's 0.89
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- Beta 0.89, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.60x
- 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs FRBA's 1.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
FXNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 96.0%
- 241.1% 10Y total return vs FRBA's 138.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.70, Low D/E 22.9%, current ratio 0.10x
- NIM 3.6% vs NBTB's 3.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 11.7x), PEG 0.73 vs 7.87 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FXNC's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs NBTB's 0.89 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs FRBA's 1.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.9% vs FRBA's +8.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FXNC's 0.5% |
FRBA vs MNSB vs NBTB vs FXNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FRBA vs MNSB vs NBTB vs FXNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FRBA leads in 1 of 6 categories
FXNC leads 1 • NBTB leads 1 • MNSB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NBTB and FXNC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 7.7x FXNC's $112M. NBTB is the more profitable business, keeping 19.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNSB's 11.5%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $247M | $136M | $867M | $112M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $60M | $23M | $241M | $25M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $44M | $16M | $169M | $18M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $63M | $13M | $225M | $21M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.2% | +54.4% | +72.1% | +74.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.2% | +14.0% | +25.3% | +19.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.7% | +11.5% | +19.5% | +15.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.4% | +7.8% | +25.2% | +18.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.5% | +120.9% | +39.5% | +7.1% |
Valuation Metrics
FRBA leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.9x trailing earnings, FRBA trades at a 38% valuation discount to FXNC's 14.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FRBA offers better value at 0.71x vs FXNC's 9.55x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $388M | $176M | $2.4B | $253M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $356M | $221M | $2.5B | $134M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.86x | 13.36x | 13.53x | 14.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.07x | 10.45x | 10.80x | 11.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.71x | — | 1.92x | 9.55x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.22x | 11.58x | 10.35x | 6.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.57x | 1.30x | 2.71x | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.87x | 0.82x | 1.21x | 1.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.19x | 16.57x | 10.75x | 12.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — NBTB and FXNC each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FRBA delivers a 10.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FRBA's 0.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.2% | +7.3% | +9.5% | +10.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +0.7% | +1.1% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | +5.0% | +7.9% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.8% | +0.9% | +2.4% | +9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.61x | 0.32x | 0.17x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$31M | $45M | $142M | -$118M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $302M | $25M | $185M | $161M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $271M | $70M | $327M | $43M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.58x | 0.31x | 1.05x | 0.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FXNC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FXNC five years ago would be worth $16,866 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,056 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, FXNC leads with a +46.9% total return vs FRBA's +8.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FXNC at 28.2% vs MNSB's 6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.0% | +19.4% | +9.3% | +14.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.1% | +26.4% | +9.0% | +46.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.0% | +21.5% | +54.1% | +110.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.0% | +20.6% | +29.9% | +68.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +138.3% | +126.9% | +102.2% | +241.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.5% | +6.7% | +15.5% | +28.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MNSB and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNSB is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs FRBA's 85.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.78x | 0.66x | 0.89x | 0.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.11 | $25.17 | $46.92 | $29.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.21 | $17.86 | $39.20 | $18.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.1% | +93.4% | +96.1% | +93.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.1 | 50.4 | 57.3 | 47.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 66K | 58K | 236K | 80K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FRBA as "Buy", MNSB as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", FXNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.2% upside for FRBA (target: $17) vs -24.9% for FXNC (target: $21). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs FRBA's 1.55%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | — | $46.00 | $21.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 1 | 10 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | — | +3.2% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 12 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.24 | — | $1.43 | $0.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +0.1% |
FRBA leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). FXNC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
FRBA vs MNSB vs NBTB vs FXNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FRBA or MNSB or NBTB or FXNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger pick with 27.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). First Bank (FRBA) offers the better valuation at 8. 9x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Bank (FRBA) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FRBA or MNSB or NBTB or FXNC?
On trailing P/E, First Bank (FRBA) is the cheapest at 8.
9x versus First National Corporation at 14. 3x. On forward P/E, First Bank is actually cheaper at 9. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First Bank wins at 0. 73x versus First National Corporation's 7. 87x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FRBA or MNSB or NBTB or FXNC?
Over the past 5 years, First National Corporation (FXNC) delivered a total return of +68.
7%, compared to +20. 6% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FXNC returned +241. 1% versus NBTB's +102. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FRBA or MNSB or NBTB or FXNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 89β — meaning NBTB is approximately 34% more volatile than MNSB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 61% for First Bank — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FRBA or MNSB or NBTB or FXNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First National Corporation (FXNC) is pulling ahead at 27.
1% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to 4. 2% for First Bank. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FRBA or MNSB or NBTB or FXNC?
NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus 11. 5% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus 14. 0% for MNSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FXNC leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FRBA or MNSB or NBTB or FXNC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First Bank (FRBA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 73x versus First National Corporation's 7. 87x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First Bank (FRBA) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 11. 7x for First National Corporation — 2. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FRBA: 10. 2% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FRBA or MNSB or NBTB or FXNC?
In this comparison, NBTB (3.
2% yield), FXNC (2. 2% yield), FRBA (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. MNSB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FRBA or MNSB or NBTB or FXNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
70), 2. 2% yield, +241. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FXNC: +241. 1%, MNSB: +126. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FRBA and MNSB and NBTB and FXNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FRBA is a small-cap deep-value stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock. FRBA, NBTB, FXNC pay a dividend while MNSB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.