Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FRPH vs NXRT vs ELME vs IIPR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
REIT - Office
REIT - Industrial
FRPH vs NXRT vs ELME vs IIPR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | REIT - Residential | REIT - Office | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $406M | $756M | $188M | $1.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $42M | $252M | $0.00 | $263M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $-32M | $-154M | $120M |
| Gross Margin | 64.1% | 91.1% | — | 60.3% |
| Operating Margin | 19.5% | 11.5% | — | 46.7% |
| Forward P/E | 17.6x | — | — | 13.2x |
| Total Debt | $179M | $1.56B | $520M | $394M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $149M | $14M | $1.33B | $48M |
FRPH vs NXRT vs ELME vs IIPR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FRP Holdings, Inc. (FRPH) | 100 | 107.5 | +7.5% |
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 93.2 | -6.8% |
| Elme Communities (ELME) | 100 | 9.7 | -90.3% |
| Innovative Industri… (IIPR) | 100 | 69.3 | -30.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FRPH vs NXRT vs ELME vs IIPR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FRPH is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 0.6%, EPS growth 21.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.2%
- 0.6% FFO/revenue growth vs ELME's -100.0%
NXRT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 211.1% 10Y total return vs IIPR's 436.4%
ELME is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 34.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, current ratio 1.02x
- Beta 0.47, yield 34.1%, current ratio 1.02x
- Beta 0.47 vs IIPR's 0.92
IIPR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 45.6% margin vs NXRT's -12.7%
- +20.3% vs FRPH's -23.0%
- 5.1% ROA vs ELME's -8.3%, ROIC 4.3% vs -15.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.6% FFO/revenue growth vs ELME's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 45.6% margin vs NXRT's -12.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs IIPR's 0.92 | |
| Dividends | 34.1% yield, vs NXRT's 7.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.3% vs FRPH's -23.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.1% ROA vs ELME's -8.3%, ROIC 4.3% vs -15.3% |
FRPH vs NXRT vs ELME vs IIPR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FRPH vs NXRT vs ELME vs IIPR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IIPR leads in 2 of 6 categories
FRPH leads 0 • NXRT leads 0 • ELME leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FRPH and NXRT and IIPR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IIPR and ELME operate at a comparable scale, with $263M and $0 in trailing revenue. IIPR is the more profitable business, keeping 45.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NXRT's -12.7%. On growth, FRPH holds the edge at +1.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $42M | $252M | $0 | $263M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $19M | $125M | -$44M | $197M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | -$32M | -$154M | $120M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $29M | $79M | $62M | $144M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.1% | +91.1% | — | +60.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.5% | +11.5% | — | +46.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | -12.7% | — | +45.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +67.9% | +31.2% | — | +54.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.3% | +0.5% | -4.0% | -3.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -51.5% | 0.0% | -6.6% | -1.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NXRT and ELME and IIPR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, IIPR trades at a 77% valuation discount to FRPH's 62.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IIPR's 9.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FRPH's 19.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $406M | $756M | $188M | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $436M | $2.3B | -$624M | $2.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 62.53x | -23.65x | -1.21x | 14.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.57x | — | — | 13.17x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 3.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.76x | 18.60x | — | 9.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.73x | 3.01x | — | 6.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.86x | 2.52x | 0.78x | 0.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.02x | 9.05x | 3.03x | 9.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IIPR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IIPR delivers a 6.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-19 for ELME. IIPR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FRPH scores 6/9 vs IIPR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.0% | -10.1% | -18.9% | +6.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | -1.7% | -8.3% | +5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.8% | +1.1% | -15.3% | +4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.7% | +1.5% | -10.1% | +5.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.38x | 5.18x | 2.18x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $30M | $1.5B | -$812M | $346M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $149M | $14M | $1.3B | $48M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $179M | $1.6B | $520M | $394M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.72x | 0.47x | -3.82x | 6.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IIPR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ELME five years ago would be worth $8,473 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,999 for IIPR. Over the past 12 months, IIPR leads with a +20.3% total return vs FRPH's -23.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IIPR at 4.5% vs FRPH's -8.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.6% | +2.6% | -4.2% | +18.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.0% | -15.2% | +8.1% | +20.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.9% | -15.5% | +13.3% | +14.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.4% | -23.0% | -15.3% | -50.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.8% | +211.1% | -11.6% | +436.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.7% | -5.5% | +4.2% | +4.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ELME and IIPR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ELME is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IIPR's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IIPR currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs ELME's 12.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.66x | 0.62x | 0.47x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.38 | $38.30 | $17.68 | $61.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.54 | $23.79 | $1.98 | $44.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.9% | +77.8% | +12.0% | +92.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.4 | 71.0 | 50.6 | 59.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 60K | 216K | 1.2M | 303K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NXRT and ELME each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NXRT as "Hold", ELME as "Hold", IIPR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 796.2% upside for ELME (target: $19) vs -22.3% for IIPR (target: $44). For income investors, ELME offers the higher dividend yield at 34.11% vs NXRT's 7.07%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 | $19.00 | $44.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 8 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +7.1% | +34.1% | +13.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 12 | 0 | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.11 | $0.72 | $7.62 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% | 0.0% | +1.2% |
IIPR leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 4 categories are tied.
FRPH vs NXRT vs ELME vs IIPR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FRPH or NXRT or ELME or IIPR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FRP Holdings, Inc.
(FRPH) is the stronger pick with 0. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Elme Communities (ELME). Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (13. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FRPH or NXRT or ELME or IIPR?
On trailing P/E, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
(IIPR) is the cheapest at 14. 4x versus FRP Holdings, Inc. at 62. 5x. On forward P/E, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FRPH or NXRT or ELME or IIPR?
Over the past 5 years, Elme Communities (ELME) delivered a total return of -15.
3%, compared to -50. 0% for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IIPR returned +436. 4% versus ELME's -11. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FRPH or NXRT or ELME or IIPR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Elme Communities (ELME) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
47β versus Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning IIPR is approximately 96% more volatile than ELME relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FRPH or NXRT or ELME or IIPR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FRP Holdings, Inc.
(FRPH) is pulling ahead at 0. 6% versus -100. 0% for Elme Communities (ELME). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FRP Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 21. 4% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FRPH leads at 10. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FRPH or NXRT or ELME or IIPR?
Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
(IIPR) is the more profitable company, earning 43. 0% net margin versus -12. 7% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 43. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IIPR leads at 46. 7% versus 0. 0% for ELME. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FRPH leads at 91. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FRPH or NXRT or ELME or IIPR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
(IIPR) trades at 13. 2x forward P/E versus 17. 6x for FRP Holdings, Inc. — 4. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ELME: 796. 2% to $19. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FRPH or NXRT or ELME or IIPR?
In this comparison, ELME (34.
1% yield), IIPR (13. 5% yield), NXRT (7. 1% yield) pay a dividend. FRPH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FRPH or NXRT or ELME or IIPR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.
(NXRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 62), 7. 1% yield, +211. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NXRT: +211. 1%, FRPH: +26. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FRPH and NXRT and ELME and IIPR?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FRPH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ELME is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IIPR is a small-cap deep-value stock. NXRT, ELME, IIPR pay a dividend while FRPH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.