Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FRST vs MNSB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
FRST vs MNSB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $360M | $176M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $313M | $136M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $61M | $16M |
| Gross Margin | 67.6% | 54.4% |
| Operating Margin | 23.2% | 14.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.1x | 10.4x |
| Total Debt | $262M | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $144M | $25M |
FRST vs MNSB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primis Financial Co… (FRST) | 100 | 145.0 | +45.0% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 177.2 | +77.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FRST vs MNSB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FRST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 23.0%, EPS growth 477.3%
- 23.0% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4%
- Lower P/E (9.1x vs 10.4x)
MNSB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.66
- 126.9% 10Y total return vs FRST's 52.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 32.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.0% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 10.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FRST's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs FRST's 0.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +72.1% vs MNSB's +26.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FRST's 0.4% |
FRST vs MNSB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FRST vs MNSB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FRST leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FRST is the larger business by revenue, generating $313M annually — 2.3x MNSB's $136M. FRST is the more profitable business, keeping 19.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNSB's 11.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $313M | $136M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $79M | $23M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $61M | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $13M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.6% | +54.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.2% | +14.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +7.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.3% | +120.9% |
Valuation Metrics
FRST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.9x trailing earnings, FRST trades at a 56% valuation discount to MNSB's 13.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FRST's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MNSB's 11.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $360M | $176M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $479M | $221M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.86x | 13.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.10x | 10.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.28x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.60x | 11.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.15x | 1.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.85x | 0.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 39.89x | 16.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FRST leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FRST delivers a 15.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. MNSB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FRST's 0.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FRST scores 6/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.8% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.2% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.1% | +0.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.62x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $119M | $45M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $144M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $262M | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.82x | 0.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — FRST and MNSB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MNSB five years ago would be worth $12,056 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,317 for FRST. Over the past 12 months, FRST leads with a +72.1% total return vs MNSB's +26.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FRST at 29.3% vs MNSB's 6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.6% | +19.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +72.1% | +26.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +116.0% | +21.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.2% | +20.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.1% | +126.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +29.3% | +6.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FRST and MNSB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNSB is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FRST's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FRST currently trades 97.5% from its 52-week high vs MNSB's 93.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.97 | $25.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.69 | $17.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.5% | +93.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.9 | 50.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 191K | 58K |
Analyst Outlook
MNSB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FRST as "Buy" and MNSB as "Hold". FRST is the only dividend payer here at 2.74% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.40 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% |
FRST leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MNSB leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
FRST vs MNSB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FRST or MNSB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Primis Financial Corp.
(FRST) is the stronger pick with 23. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Primis Financial Corp. (FRST) offers the better valuation at 5. 9x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Primis Financial Corp. (FRST) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FRST or MNSB?
On trailing P/E, Primis Financial Corp.
(FRST) is the cheapest at 5. 9x versus MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. at 13. 4x. On forward P/E, Primis Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FRST or MNSB?
Over the past 5 years, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) delivered a total return of +20. 6%, compared to +13. 2% for Primis Financial Corp. (FRST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MNSB returned +126. 9% versus FRST's +52. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FRST or MNSB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus Primis Financial Corp. 's 0. 87β — meaning FRST is approximately 31% more volatile than MNSB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 62% for Primis Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FRST or MNSB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Primis Financial Corp.
(FRST) is pulling ahead at 23. 0% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Primis Financial Corp. grew EPS 477. 3% year-over-year, compared to 210. 0% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FRST or MNSB?
Primis Financial Corp.
(FRST) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 7% net margin versus 11. 5% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FRST leads at 23. 2% versus 14. 0% for MNSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FRST leads at 67. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FRST or MNSB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Primis Financial Corp.
(FRST) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 10. 4x for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — 1. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — FRST or MNSB?
In this comparison, FRST (2.
7% yield) pays a dividend. MNSB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FRST or MNSB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Primis Financial Corp.
(FRST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 2. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FRST: +52. 1%, MNSB: +126. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FRST and MNSB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FRST is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock. FRST pays a dividend while MNSB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.