Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FRST vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
FRST vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $364M | $2.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $313M | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $61M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 67.6% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | 23.2% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 9.2x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $262M | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $144M | $185M |
FRST vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primis Financial Co… (FRST) | 100 | 146.4 | +46.4% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 144.3 | +44.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FRST vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FRST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 23.0%, EPS growth 477.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 62.0%, current ratio 0.07x
- PEG 0.44 vs NBTB's 1.54
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- 102.2% 10Y total return vs FRST's 50.8%
- Beta 0.89, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.60x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.0% NII/revenue growth vs NBTB's 10.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.2x vs 10.8x), PEG 0.44 vs 1.54 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs NBTB's 0.89 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs FRST's 2.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +72.7% vs NBTB's +9.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
FRST vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FRST vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 2.8x FRST's $313M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 19.7% (FRST) to 19.5% (NBTB).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $313M | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $79M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $61M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.6% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.2% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.3% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
FRST leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.9x trailing earnings, FRST trades at a 56% valuation discount to NBTB's 13.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FRST offers better value at 0.28x vs NBTB's 1.93x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $364M | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $482M | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.92x | 13.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.19x | 10.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.28x | 1.93x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.65x | 10.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.16x | 2.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.86x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 40.28x | 10.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FRST leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FRST delivers a 15.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $10 for NBTB. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FRST's 0.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs FRST's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.8% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.2% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.1% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.62x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $119M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $144M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $262M | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.82x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FRST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NBTB five years ago would be worth $12,950 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,342 for FRST. Over the past 12 months, FRST leads with a +72.7% total return vs NBTB's +9.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FRST at 29.6% vs NBTB's 15.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.6% | +9.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +72.7% | +9.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +117.9% | +54.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.4% | +29.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.8% | +102.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +29.6% | +15.6% |
Risk & Volatility
FRST leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FRST is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.97 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.66 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.4% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.1 | 54.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 188K | 234K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FRST as "Buy" and NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 1.8% upside for NBTB (target: $46) vs -5.0% for FRST (target: $14). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.16% vs FRST's 2.72%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.40 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.4% |
FRST leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). NBTB leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook).
FRST vs NBTB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FRST or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Primis Financial Corp.
(FRST) is the stronger pick with 23. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 4% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). Primis Financial Corp. (FRST) offers the better valuation at 5. 9x trailing P/E (9. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Primis Financial Corp. (FRST) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FRST or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, Primis Financial Corp.
(FRST) is the cheapest at 5. 9x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. at 13. 6x. On forward P/E, Primis Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 9. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Primis Financial Corp. wins at 0. 44x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 54x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FRST or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) delivered a total return of +29. 5%, compared to +13. 4% for Primis Financial Corp. (FRST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBTB returned +102. 2% versus FRST's +50. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FRST or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Primis Financial Corp.
(FRST) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 89β — meaning NBTB is approximately 2% more volatile than FRST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 62% for Primis Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FRST or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Primis Financial Corp.
(FRST) is pulling ahead at 23. 0% versus 10. 4% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Primis Financial Corp. grew EPS 477. 3% year-over-year, compared to 12. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FRST or NBTB?
Primis Financial Corp.
(FRST) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 7% net margin versus 19. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus 23. 2% for FRST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FRST or NBTB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Primis Financial Corp. (FRST) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 44x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 54x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Primis Financial Corp. (FRST) trades at 9. 2x forward P/E versus 10. 8x for NBT Bancorp Inc. — 1. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NBTB: 1. 8% to $46. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FRST or NBTB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 2. 7% for Primis Financial Corp. (FRST).
09Is FRST or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 3. 2% yield, +102. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NBTB: +102. 2%, FRST: +50. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FRST and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FRST is a small-cap high-growth stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.