Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FRST vs NBTB vs CZWI vs ICE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
FRST vs NBTB vs CZWI vs ICE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| Market Cap | $360M | $2.35B | $203M | $88.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $313M | $867M | $90M | $12.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $61M | $169M | $14M | $3.30B |
| Gross Margin | 67.6% | 72.1% | 54.7% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 23.2% | 25.3% | 7.0% | 38.7% |
| Forward P/E | 9.1x | 10.8x | 11.8x | 19.5x |
| Total Debt | $262M | $327M | $52M | $20.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $144M | $185M | $119M | $837M |
FRST vs NBTB vs CZWI vs ICE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primis Financial Co… (FRST) | 100 | 145.0 | +45.0% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
| Intercontinental Ex… (ICE) | 100 | 160.6 | +60.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FRST vs NBTB vs CZWI vs ICE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FRST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 23.0%, EPS growth 477.3%
- PEG 0.43 vs CZWI's 2.32
- 23.0% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- Lower P/E (9.1x vs 19.5x), PEG 0.43 vs 2.19
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- NIM 3.1% vs FRST's 2.8%
- 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs ICE's 1.2%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
ICE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 225.3% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 157.0%
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.33 vs NBTB's 0.89
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CZWI's 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.0% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 19.5x), PEG 0.43 vs 2.19 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs NBTB's 0.89 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs ICE's 1.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +72.1% vs ICE's -10.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CZWI's 0.5% |
FRST vs NBTB vs CZWI vs ICE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FRST vs NBTB vs CZWI vs ICE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ICE leads in 2 of 6 categories
FRST leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • NBTB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.6B annually — 140.3x CZWI's $90M. ICE is the more profitable business, keeping 26.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZWI's 16.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $313M | $867M | $90M | $12.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $79M | $241M | $9M | $6.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $61M | $169M | $14M | $3.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $225M | $11M | $4.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.6% | +72.1% | +54.7% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.2% | +25.3% | +7.0% | +38.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +19.5% | +16.0% | +26.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +25.2% | +11.5% | +33.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.3% | +39.5% | +63.0% | +23.1% |
Valuation Metrics
FRST leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.9x trailing earnings, FRST trades at a 78% valuation discount to ICE's 27.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FRST offers better value at 0.28x vs ICE's 3.05x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $360M | $2.4B | $203M | $88.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $479M | $2.5B | $136M | $107.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.86x | 13.53x | 14.44x | 27.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.10x | 10.80x | 11.78x | 19.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.28x | 1.92x | 2.85x | 3.05x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.60x | 10.35x | 15.28x | 16.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.15x | 2.71x | 2.25x | 7.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.85x | 1.21x | 1.09x | 3.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 39.89x | 10.75x | 19.55x | 20.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ICE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FRST delivers a 15.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ICE's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.8% | +9.5% | +7.8% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +1.1% | +0.8% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.2% | +7.9% | +2.0% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.1% | +2.4% | +0.6% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.62x | 0.17x | 0.28x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $119M | $142M | -$67M | $19.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $144M | $185M | $119M | $837M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $262M | $327M | $52M | $20.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.82x | 1.05x | 0.16x | 6.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $17,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,317 for FRST. Over the past 12 months, FRST leads with a +72.1% total return vs ICE's -10.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs ICE's 14.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.6% | +9.3% | +21.5% | -2.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +72.1% | +9.0% | +45.6% | -10.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +116.0% | +54.1% | +160.0% | +50.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.2% | +29.9% | +71.2% | +43.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.1% | +102.2% | +157.0% | +225.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +29.3% | +15.5% | +37.5% | +14.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FRST and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FRST currently trades 97.5% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 82.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 0.89x | 0.46x | 0.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.97 | $46.92 | $22.62 | $189.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.69 | $39.20 | $12.83 | $143.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.5% | +96.1% | +93.2% | +82.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.9 | 57.3 | 63.7 | 38.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 191K | 236K | 40K | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NBTB and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FRST as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", ICE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.3% upside for ICE (target: $196) vs -4.0% for FRST (target: $14). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs ICE's 1.24%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $46.00 | — | $195.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 10 | 2 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +3.2% | +1.8% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 12 | 7 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.40 | $1.43 | $0.37 | $1.93 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.4% | +3.1% | +1.6% |
ICE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FRST leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
FRST vs NBTB vs CZWI vs ICE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FRST or NBTB or CZWI or ICE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Primis Financial Corp.
(FRST) is the stronger pick with 23. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Primis Financial Corp. (FRST) offers the better valuation at 5. 9x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Primis Financial Corp. (FRST) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FRST or NBTB or CZWI or ICE?
On trailing P/E, Primis Financial Corp.
(FRST) is the cheapest at 5. 9x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. at 27. 1x. On forward P/E, Primis Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Primis Financial Corp. wins at 0. 43x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FRST or NBTB or CZWI or ICE?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +71. 2%, compared to +13. 2% for Primis Financial Corp. (FRST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ICE returned +225. 3% versus FRST's +52. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FRST or NBTB or CZWI or ICE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 89β — meaning NBTB is approximately 171% more volatile than ICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 70% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FRST or NBTB or CZWI or ICE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Primis Financial Corp.
(FRST) is pulling ahead at 23. 0% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Primis Financial Corp. grew EPS 477. 3% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FRST or NBTB or CZWI or ICE?
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus 16. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FRST or NBTB or CZWI or ICE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Primis Financial Corp. (FRST) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 43x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Primis Financial Corp. (FRST) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 19. 5x for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — 10. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICE: 25. 3% to $195. 71.
08Which pays a better dividend — FRST or NBTB or CZWI or ICE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 1. 2% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE).
09Is FRST or NBTB or CZWI or ICE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), 1. 2% yield, +225. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +225. 3%, FRST: +52. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FRST and NBTB and CZWI and ICE?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FRST is a small-cap high-growth stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.