Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FRST vs NBTB vs CZWI vs ICE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FRST
Primis Financial Corp.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$360M
5Y Perf.+45.0%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.35B
5Y Perf.+43.9%
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$203M
5Y Perf.+186.8%
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$88.45B
5Y Perf.+60.6%

FRST vs NBTB vs CZWI vs ICE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FRST logoFRST
NBTB logoNBTB
CZWI logoCZWI
ICE logoICE
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalFinancial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Market Cap$360M$2.35B$203M$88.45B
Revenue (TTM)$313M$867M$90M$12.64B
Net Income (TTM)$61M$169M$14M$3.30B
Gross Margin67.6%72.1%54.7%61.9%
Operating Margin23.2%25.3%7.0%38.7%
Forward P/E9.1x10.8x11.8x19.5x
Total Debt$262M$327M$52M$20.28B
Cash & Equiv.$144M$185M$119M$837M

FRST vs NBTB vs CZWI vs ICELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FRST
NBTB
CZWI
ICE
StockMay 20May 26Return
Primis Financial Co… (FRST)100145.0+45.0%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100143.9+43.9%
Citizens Community … (CZWI)100286.8+186.8%
Intercontinental Ex… (ICE)100160.6+60.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FRST vs NBTB vs CZWI vs ICE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FRST and ICE are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. NBTB also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FRST
Primis Financial Corp.
The Banking Pick

FRST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.

  • Rev growth 23.0%, EPS growth 477.3%
  • PEG 0.43 vs CZWI's 2.32
  • 23.0% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
  • Lower P/E (9.1x vs 19.5x), PEG 0.43 vs 2.19
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and bank quality.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
  • NIM 3.1% vs FRST's 2.8%
  • 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs ICE's 1.2%
Best for: income & stability and bank quality
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
  • Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
The Banking Pick

ICE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 225.3% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 157.0%
  • Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
  • Beta 0.33 vs NBTB's 0.89
  • Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CZWI's 0.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFRST logoFRST23.0% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
ValueFRST logoFRSTLower P/E (9.1x vs 19.5x), PEG 0.43 vs 2.19
Quality / MarginsICE logoICEEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyICE logoICEBeta 0.33 vs NBTB's 0.89
DividendsNBTB logoNBTB3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs ICE's 1.2%
Momentum (1Y)FRST logoFRST+72.1% vs ICE's -10.4%
Efficiency (ROA)ICE logoICEEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs CZWI's 0.5%

FRST vs NBTB vs CZWI vs ICE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FRSTPrimis Financial Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M
CZWICitizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$99M
ICEIntercontinental Exchange, Inc.
FY 2025
Fixed Income And Data Services Segment
51.1%$1.4B
Exchanges Segment
38.8%$1.0B
Mortgage Technology Segment
10.1%$269M

FRST vs NBTB vs CZWI vs ICE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLICELAGGINGNBTB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ICE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

ICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.6B annually — 140.3x CZWI's $90M. ICE is the more profitable business, keeping 26.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZWI's 16.0%.

MetricFRST logoFRSTPrimis Financial …NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$313M$867M$90M$12.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$79M$241M$9M$6.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$61M$169M$14M$3.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$9M$225M$11M$4.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+67.6%+72.1%+54.7%+61.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+23.2%+25.3%+7.0%+38.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+19.7%+19.5%+16.0%+26.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.9%+25.2%+11.5%+33.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.3%+39.5%+63.0%+23.1%
ICE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FRST leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 5.9x trailing earnings, FRST trades at a 78% valuation discount to ICE's 27.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FRST offers better value at 0.28x vs ICE's 3.05x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFRST logoFRSTPrimis Financial …NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
Market CapShares × price$360M$2.4B$203M$88.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$479M$2.5B$136M$107.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS5.86x13.53x14.44x27.06x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.10x10.80x11.78x19.48x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.28x1.92x2.85x3.05x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.60x10.35x15.28x16.71x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.15x2.71x2.25x7.00x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.85x1.21x1.09x3.08x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF39.89x10.75x19.55x20.62x
FRST leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ICE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

FRST delivers a 15.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ICE's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFRST logoFRSTPrimis Financial …NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+15.8%+9.5%+7.8%+11.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.6%+1.1%+0.8%+2.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.2%+7.9%+2.0%+7.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.1%+2.4%+0.6%+9.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–96769
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.62x0.17x0.28x0.70x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$119M$142M-$67M$19.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$144M$185M$119M$837M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$262M$327M$52M$20.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.82x1.05x0.16x6.53x
ICE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $17,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,317 for FRST. Over the past 12 months, FRST leads with a +72.1% total return vs ICE's -10.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs ICE's 14.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFRST logoFRSTPrimis Financial …NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+12.6%+9.3%+21.5%-2.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+72.1%+9.0%+45.6%-10.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+116.0%+54.1%+160.0%+50.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+13.2%+29.9%+71.2%+43.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+52.1%+102.2%+157.0%+225.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+29.3%+15.5%+37.5%+14.7%
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FRST and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FRST currently trades 97.5% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 82.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFRST logoFRSTPrimis Financial …NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.87x0.89x0.46x0.33x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$14.97$46.92$22.62$189.35
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$8.69$39.20$12.83$143.17
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+97.5%+96.1%+93.2%+82.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10064.957.363.738.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded191K236K40K3.0M
Evenly matched — FRST and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — NBTB and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: FRST as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", ICE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.3% upside for ICE (target: $196) vs -4.0% for FRST (target: $14). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs ICE's 1.24%.

MetricFRST logoFRSTPrimis Financial …NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$14.00$46.00$195.71
# AnalystsCovering analysts210236
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.7%+3.2%+1.8%+1.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises012714
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.40$1.43$0.37$1.93
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.2%+0.4%+3.1%+1.6%
Evenly matched — NBTB and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ICE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FRST leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallIntercontinental Exchange, … (ICE)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FRST vs NBTB vs CZWI vs ICE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FRST or NBTB or CZWI or ICE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Primis Financial Corp.

(FRST) is the stronger pick with 23. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Primis Financial Corp. (FRST) offers the better valuation at 5. 9x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Primis Financial Corp. (FRST) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FRST or NBTB or CZWI or ICE?

On trailing P/E, Primis Financial Corp.

(FRST) is the cheapest at 5. 9x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. at 27. 1x. On forward P/E, Primis Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Primis Financial Corp. wins at 0. 43x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FRST or NBTB or CZWI or ICE?

Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

(CZWI) delivered a total return of +71. 2%, compared to +13. 2% for Primis Financial Corp. (FRST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ICE returned +225. 3% versus FRST's +52. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FRST or NBTB or CZWI or ICE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 89β — meaning NBTB is approximately 171% more volatile than ICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 70% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FRST or NBTB or CZWI or ICE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Primis Financial Corp.

(FRST) is pulling ahead at 23. 0% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Primis Financial Corp. grew EPS 477. 3% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FRST or NBTB or CZWI or ICE?

Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus 16. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FRST or NBTB or CZWI or ICE more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Primis Financial Corp. (FRST) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 43x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Primis Financial Corp. (FRST) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 19. 5x for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — 10. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICE: 25. 3% to $195. 71.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FRST or NBTB or CZWI or ICE?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 1. 2% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE).

09

Is FRST or NBTB or CZWI or ICE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), 1. 2% yield, +225. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +225. 3%, FRST: +52. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FRST and NBTB and CZWI and ICE?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FRST is a small-cap high-growth stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FRST

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NBTB

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CZWI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 9%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ICE

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FRST and NBTB and CZWI and ICE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FRST: 23.0% · NBTB: 10.4%)
Net Margin>
%
(FRST: 19.7% · NBTB: 19.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(FRST: 5.9x · NBTB: 13.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.