Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FRST vs NKSH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
FRST vs NKSH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $360M | $240M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $313M | $85M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $61M | $16M |
| Gross Margin | 67.6% | 65.1% |
| Operating Margin | 23.2% | 22.5% |
| Forward P/E | 9.1x | 11.7x |
| Total Debt | $262M | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $144M | $8M |
FRST vs NKSH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primis Financial Co… (FRST) | 100 | 145.0 | +45.0% |
| National Bankshares… (NKSH) | 100 | 122.4 | +22.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FRST vs NKSH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FRST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 23.0%, EPS growth 477.3%
- 52.1% 10Y total return vs NKSH's 51.3%
- NIM 2.8% vs NKSH's 2.5%
NKSH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 4.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 1203.84x
- Beta 0.76, yield 4.0%, current ratio 1203.84x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.0% NII/revenue growth vs NKSH's 7.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 11.7x), PEG 0.43 vs 145.48 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FRST's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs FRST's 0.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FRST's 2.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +72.1% vs NKSH's +49.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FRST's 0.4% |
FRST vs NKSH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FRST leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FRST is the larger business by revenue, generating $313M annually — 3.7x NKSH's $85M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 19.7% (FRST) to 18.6% (NKSH).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $313M | $85M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $79M | $20M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $61M | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $17M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.6% | +65.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.2% | +22.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +18.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +17.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.3% | +91.7% |
Valuation Metrics
FRST leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.9x trailing earnings, FRST trades at a 61% valuation discount to NKSH's 15.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FRST offers better value at 0.28x vs NKSH's 145.48x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $360M | $240M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $479M | $234M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.86x | 15.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.10x | 11.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.28x | 145.48x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.60x | 12.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.15x | 2.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.85x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 39.89x | 15.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FRST leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FRST delivers a 15.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $9 for NKSH. NKSH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FRST's 0.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NKSH scores 8/9 vs FRST's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.8% | +9.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.2% | +8.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.1% | +1.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.62x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $119M | -$6M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $144M | $8M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $262M | $2M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.82x | 0.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FRST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NKSH five years ago would be worth $13,187 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,317 for FRST. Over the past 12 months, FRST leads with a +72.1% total return vs NKSH's +49.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FRST at 29.3% vs NKSH's 15.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.6% | +14.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +72.1% | +49.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +116.0% | +55.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.2% | +31.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.1% | +51.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +29.3% | +15.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FRST and NKSH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NKSH is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FRST's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FRST currently trades 97.5% from its 52-week high vs NKSH's 94.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.97 | $40.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.69 | $24.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.5% | +94.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.9 | 51.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 191K | 50K |
Analyst Outlook
NKSH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FRST as "Buy" and NKSH as "Buy". For income investors, NKSH offers the higher dividend yield at 4.01% vs FRST's 2.74%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.40 | $1.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% |
FRST leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NKSH leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
FRST vs NKSH: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FRST or NKSH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Primis Financial Corp.
(FRST) is the stronger pick with 23. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 9% for National Bankshares, Inc. (NKSH). Primis Financial Corp. (FRST) offers the better valuation at 5. 9x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Primis Financial Corp. (FRST) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FRST or NKSH?
On trailing P/E, Primis Financial Corp.
(FRST) is the cheapest at 5. 9x versus National Bankshares, Inc. at 15. 1x. On forward P/E, Primis Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Primis Financial Corp. wins at 0. 43x versus National Bankshares, Inc. 's 145. 48x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FRST or NKSH?
Over the past 5 years, National Bankshares, Inc.
(NKSH) delivered a total return of +31. 9%, compared to +13. 2% for Primis Financial Corp. (FRST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FRST returned +52. 1% versus NKSH's +51. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FRST or NKSH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), National Bankshares, Inc.
(NKSH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Primis Financial Corp. 's 0. 87β — meaning FRST is approximately 15% more volatile than NKSH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, National Bankshares, Inc. (NKSH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 62% for Primis Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FRST or NKSH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Primis Financial Corp.
(FRST) is pulling ahead at 23. 0% versus 7. 9% for National Bankshares, Inc. (NKSH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Primis Financial Corp. grew EPS 477. 3% year-over-year, compared to 100. 8% for National Bankshares, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FRST or NKSH?
Primis Financial Corp.
(FRST) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 7% net margin versus 18. 6% for National Bankshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FRST leads at 23. 2% versus 22. 5% for NKSH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FRST leads at 67. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FRST or NKSH more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Primis Financial Corp. (FRST) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 43x versus National Bankshares, Inc. 's 145. 48x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Primis Financial Corp. (FRST) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 11. 7x for National Bankshares, Inc. — 2. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — FRST or NKSH?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
National Bankshares, Inc. (NKSH) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 2. 7% for Primis Financial Corp. (FRST).
09Is FRST or NKSH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, National Bankshares, Inc.
(NKSH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 4. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NKSH: +51. 3%, FRST: +52. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FRST and NKSH?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FRST is a small-cap high-growth stock; NKSH is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.