Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FSBW vs NWBI vs PFIS vs CZWI vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
FSBW vs NWBI vs PFIS vs CZWI vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $310M | $2.02B | $590M | $203M | $2.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $218M | $877M | $281M | $90M | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $33M | $126M | $59M | $14M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 66.5% | 68.3% | 66.6% | 54.7% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | 20.6% | 18.8% | 25.7% | 7.0% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 9.2x | 10.2x | 9.0x | 11.8x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $141M | $446M | $258M | $52M | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $234M | $58M | $119M | $185M |
FSBW vs NWBI vs PFIS vs CZWI vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FS Bancorp, Inc. (FSBW) | 100 | 195.6 | +95.6% |
| Northwest Bancshare… (NWBI) | 100 | 138.9 | +38.9% |
| Peoples Financial S… (PFIS) | 100 | 178.4 | +78.4% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FSBW vs NWBI vs PFIS vs CZWI vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FSBW ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 3.2%
- NIM 4.1% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- 3.2% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs NWBI's 5.4%
NWBI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PFIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 22.3%, EPS growth 493.9%
- PEG 1.13 vs CZWI's 2.32
- 22.3% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- Lower P/E (9.0x vs 10.8x), PEG 1.13 vs 1.53
CZWI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 157.0% 10Y total return vs FSBW's 288.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs NBTB's 0.89
Among these 5 stocks, NBTB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.3% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.0x vs 10.8x), PEG 1.13 vs 1.53 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NWBI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs NBTB's 0.89 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs NWBI's 5.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.6% vs FSBW's +8.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NWBI's 0.5% |
FSBW vs NWBI vs PFIS vs CZWI vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FSBW vs NWBI vs PFIS vs CZWI vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PFIS leads in 1 of 6 categories
FSBW leads 1 • NBTB leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • NWBI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFIS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NWBI is the larger business by revenue, generating $877M annually — 9.7x CZWI's $90M. PFIS is the more profitable business, keeping 21.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NWBI's 14.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $218M | $877M | $281M | $90M | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $55M | $166M | $80M | $9M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $33M | $126M | $59M | $14M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $52M | $142M | $43M | $11M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.5% | +68.3% | +66.6% | +54.7% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.6% | +18.8% | +25.7% | +7.0% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +14.4% | +21.1% | +16.0% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.9% | +16.2% | +15.4% | +11.5% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.6% | +19.2% | +95.1% | +63.0% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
FSBW leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.7x trailing earnings, FSBW trades at a 36% valuation discount to NWBI's 15.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PFIS offers better value at 1.25x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $310M | $2.0B | $590M | $203M | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $437M | $2.2B | $790M | $136M | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.65x | 15.03x | 10.03x | 14.44x | 13.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.25x | 10.20x | 9.02x | 11.78x | 10.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.83x | 1.25x | 2.85x | 1.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.96x | 13.57x | 10.94x | 15.28x | 10.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.42x | 2.31x | 2.10x | 2.25x | 2.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.03x | 1.07x | 1.14x | 1.09x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.97x | 14.27x | 13.61x | 19.55x | 10.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PFIS delivers a 11.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $7 for NWBI. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFIS's 0.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FSBW scores 7/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.1% | +7.2% | +11.8% | +7.8% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +0.8% | +1.2% | +0.8% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | +5.6% | +7.7% | +2.0% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.9% | +6.8% | +2.4% | +0.6% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 0.24x | 0.50x | 0.28x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $128M | $213M | $200M | -$67M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $234M | $58M | $119M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $141M | $446M | $258M | $52M | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.67x | 0.73x | 0.77x | 0.16x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $17,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,663 for NWBI. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +45.6% total return vs FSBW's +8.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs FSBW's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.5% | +18.8% | +23.7% | +21.5% | +9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.4% | +18.3% | +34.0% | +45.6% | +9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +54.0% | +56.2% | +70.7% | +160.0% | +54.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.8% | +26.6% | +57.5% | +71.2% | +29.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +288.9% | +52.3% | +93.9% | +157.0% | +102.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.5% | +16.0% | +19.5% | +37.5% | +15.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PFIS and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PFIS currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs CZWI's 93.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 0.73x | 0.82x | 0.46x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.22 | $14.26 | $59.86 | $22.62 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.65 | $11.25 | $43.64 | $12.83 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.4% | +97.0% | +98.5% | +93.2% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.4 | 64.4 | 60.7 | 63.7 | 57.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14K | 1.3M | 53K | 40K | 236K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FSBW and NWBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FSBW as "Hold", NWBI as "Hold", PFIS as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 8.9% upside for FSBW (target: $45) vs -5.0% for PFIS (target: $56). For income investors, NWBI offers the higher dividend yield at 5.42% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $45.00 | $14.67 | $56.00 | — | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 14 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | +5.4% | +4.1% | +1.8% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 13 | 0 | 9 | 7 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.34 | $0.75 | $2.45 | $0.37 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.1% | +0.4% |
PFIS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FSBW leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
FSBW vs NWBI vs PFIS vs CZWI vs NBTB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FSBW or NWBI or PFIS or CZWI or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Peoples Financial Services Corp.
(PFIS) is the stronger pick with 22. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). FS Bancorp, Inc. (FSBW) offers the better valuation at 9. 7x trailing P/E (9. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FSBW or NWBI or PFIS or CZWI or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, FS Bancorp, Inc.
(FSBW) is the cheapest at 9. 7x versus Northwest Bancshares, Inc. at 15. 0x. On forward P/E, Peoples Financial Services Corp. is actually cheaper at 9. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Peoples Financial Services Corp. wins at 1. 13x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FSBW or NWBI or PFIS or CZWI or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +71. 2%, compared to +26. 6% for Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FSBW returned +288. 9% versus NWBI's +52. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FSBW or NWBI or PFIS or CZWI or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 89β — meaning NBTB is approximately 94% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 50% for Peoples Financial Services Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FSBW or NWBI or PFIS or CZWI or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Peoples Financial Services Corp.
(PFIS) is pulling ahead at 22. 3% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Peoples Financial Services Corp. grew EPS 493. 9% year-over-year, compared to -1. 8% for FS Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FSBW or NWBI or PFIS or CZWI or NBTB?
Peoples Financial Services Corp.
(PFIS) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 1% net margin versus 14. 4% for Northwest Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PFIS leads at 25. 7% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FSBW or NWBI or PFIS or CZWI or NBTB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Peoples Financial Services Corp. (PFIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 13x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Peoples Financial Services Corp. (PFIS) trades at 9. 0x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 2. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FSBW: 8. 9% to $45. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FSBW or NWBI or PFIS or CZWI or NBTB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) offers the highest yield at 5. 4%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is FSBW or NWBI or PFIS or CZWI or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, NBTB: +102. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FSBW and NWBI and PFIS and CZWI and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FSBW is a small-cap deep-value stock; NWBI is a small-cap high-growth stock; PFIS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.