FSV vs HD

For growth investors, FirstService Corporation (FSV) is the stronger pick with 5.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 2% for The Home Depot, Inc. (HD). The Home Depot, Inc. (HD) offers the better valuation at 22. 2x trailing P/E (21. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FirstService Corporation (FSV) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, The Home Depot, Inc.

(HD) is the cheapest at 22. 2x versus FirstService Corporation at 39. 8x. On forward P/E, FirstService Corporation is actually cheaper at 20. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: FirstService Corporation wins at 2. 19x versus The Home Depot, Inc. 's 5. 87x.

Over the past 5 years, The Home Depot, Inc.

(HD) delivered a total return of +7. 4%, compared to -20. 0% for FirstService Corporation (FSV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FSV returned +196. 4% versus HD's +181. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FirstService Corporation (FSV) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

64β versus The Home Depot, Inc. 's 0. 84β — meaning HD is approximately 31% more volatile than FSV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FirstService Corporation (FSV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 87% versus 148% for The Home Depot, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), FirstService Corporation (FSV) is pulling ahead at 5.

8% versus 3. 2% for The Home Depot, Inc. (HD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FirstService Corporation grew EPS 6. 4% year-over-year, compared to -4. 6% for The Home Depot, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FSV leads at 13. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

The Home Depot, Inc.

(HD) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 6% net margin versus 2. 6% for FirstService Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HD leads at 12. 7% versus 6. 1% for FSV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HD leads at 33. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, FirstService Corporation (FSV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 19x versus The Home Depot, Inc. 's 5. 87x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, FirstService Corporation (FSV) trades at 20. 5x forward P/E versus 21. 0x for The Home Depot, Inc. — 0. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FSV: 61. 5% to $203. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

The Home Depot, Inc. (HD) offers the highest yield at 2. 9%, versus 0. 8% for FirstService Corporation (FSV).

For long-horizon retirement investors, FirstService Corporation (FSV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

64), 0. 8% yield, +196. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FSV: +196. 4%, HD: +181. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (FSV (Real Estate) and HD (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.