Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FTAI vs AL vs AER vs GATX vs WLFC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Rental & Leasing Services
Rental & Leasing Services
Rental & Leasing Services
Rental & Leasing Services
FTAI vs AL vs AER vs GATX vs WLFC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Rental & Leasing Services | Rental & Leasing Services | Rental & Leasing Services | Rental & Leasing Services |
| Market Cap | $25.07B | $7.26B | $24.13B | $6.96B | $1.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.84B | $3.02B | $8.11B | $1.70B | $758M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $537M | $1.09B | $3.93B | $313M | $121M |
| Gross Margin | 31.0% | 38.4% | 52.9% | 48.8% | 53.6% |
| Operating Margin | 28.2% | 29.5% | 45.2% | 30.6% | 19.8% |
| Forward P/E | 33.3x | 12.8x | 8.4x | 19.5x | 16.5x |
| Total Debt | $3.45B | $19.73B | $43.57B | $8.41B | $2.71B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $300M | $466M | $1.48B | $402M | $16M |
FTAI vs AL vs AER vs GATX vs WLFC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FTAI Aviation Ltd. (FTAI) | 100 | 2542.9 | +2442.9% |
| Air Lease Corporati… (AL) | 100 | 215.7 | +115.7% |
| AerCap Holdings N.V. (AER) | 100 | 448.6 | +348.6% |
| GATX Corporation (GATX) | 100 | 311.0 | +211.0% |
| Willis Lease Financ… (WLFC) | 100 | 1086.8 | +986.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FTAI vs AL vs AER vs GATX vs WLFC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FTAI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 43.2%, EPS growth 15.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 51.4%
- 29.1% 10Y total return vs WLFC's 8.4%
- 43.2% revenue growth vs AER's 2.4%
- +143.9% vs GATX's +34.3%
AL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.30, yield 1.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.30, current ratio 0.93x
- Beta 0.30, yield 1.3%, current ratio 0.93x
- Beta 0.30 vs FTAI's 1.79, lower leverage
AER ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (8.4x vs 19.5x)
- 48.4% margin vs WLFC's 15.9%
GATX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
WLFC is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.23 vs GATX's 0.88
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.2% revenue growth vs AER's 2.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.4x vs 19.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 48.4% margin vs WLFC's 15.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.30 vs FTAI's 1.79, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs GATX's 1.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +143.9% vs GATX's +34.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.4% ROA vs GATX's 2.4%, ROIC 16.8% vs 3.6% |
FTAI vs AL vs AER vs GATX vs WLFC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FTAI vs AL vs AER vs GATX vs WLFC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AER leads in 2 of 6 categories
FTAI leads 2 • AL leads 1 • GATX leads 0 • WLFC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AER leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AER is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.1B annually — 10.7x WLFC's $758M. AER is the more profitable business, keeping 48.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WLFC's 15.9%. On growth, FTAI holds the edge at +65.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.8B | $3.0B | $8.1B | $1.7B | $758M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.0B | $2.1B | $5.7B | $966M | $267M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $537M | $1.1B | $3.9B | $313M | $121M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.4B | -$1.7B | $405M | -$532M | -$277M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.0% | +38.4% | +52.9% | +48.8% | +53.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.2% | +29.5% | +45.2% | +30.6% | +19.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.9% | +36.1% | +48.4% | +18.3% | +15.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -48.8% | -57.4% | +5.0% | -31.2% | -36.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +65.5% | +15.1% | +4.1% | +8.4% | +23.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.3% | +81.9% | +42.5% | -7.8% | +57.9% |
Valuation Metrics
AER leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.8x trailing earnings, AER trades at a 87% valuation discount to FTAI's 53.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WLFC offers better value at 0.21x vs GATX's 1.14x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $25.1B | $7.3B | $24.1B | $7.0B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $28.2B | $6.8B | $66.2B | $15.0B | $4.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 53.12x | 7.00x | 6.79x | 25.08x | 14.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 33.28x | 12.76x | 8.41x | 19.48x | 16.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.43x | — | 1.14x | 0.21x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 28.34x | — | 9.60x | 16.72x | 13.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.00x | 2.41x | 2.95x | 4.39x | 2.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 75.94x | 0.86x | 1.39x | 2.87x | 2.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FTAI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTAI delivers a 181.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $181 in annual profit, vs $12 for GATX. AL carries lower financial leverage with a 2.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FTAI's 10.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AL scores 8/9 vs WLFC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +181.4% | +13.2% | +21.6% | +11.5% | +16.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.4% | +3.3% | +5.4% | +2.4% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.8% | +4.2% | +5.2% | +3.6% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +20.1% | +5.0% | +6.2% | +4.1% | +6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 10.32x | 2.33x | 2.38x | 3.45x | 3.74x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.1B | $19.3B | $42.1B | $8.0B | $2.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $300M | $466M | $1.5B | $402M | $16M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.4B | $19.7B | $43.6B | $8.4B | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.46x | 6.32x | 2.42x | 0.85x | 1.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FTAI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FTAI five years ago would be worth $105,955 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,210 for AL. Over the past 12 months, FTAI leads with a +143.9% total return vs GATX's +34.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FTAI at 107.7% vs GATX's 21.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.4% | +1.7% | +0.3% | +14.6% | +71.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +143.9% | +35.1% | +35.5% | +34.3% | +47.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +796.3% | +78.5% | +164.7% | +77.4% | +347.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +959.5% | +42.1% | +143.5% | +105.9% | +451.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2909.4% | +136.6% | +267.6% | +389.6% | +837.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +107.7% | +21.3% | +38.3% | +21.1% | +64.8% |
Risk & Volatility
AL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AL is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FTAI's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AL currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs FTAI's 75.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.79x | 0.30x | 0.74x | 0.71x | 1.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $323.51 | $65.00 | $154.94 | $205.56 | $230.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $89.75 | $47.44 | $105.65 | $143.46 | $114.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.5% | +100.0% | +93.3% | +94.9% | +99.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.6 | 66.3 | 44.8 | 55.1 | 54.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 2.4M | 1.3M | 183K | 73K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AL and GATX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FTAI as "Buy", AL as "Buy", AER as "Buy", GATX as "Buy", WLFC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.8% upside for FTAI (target: $298) vs 0.0% for AL (target: $65). For income investors, AL offers the higher dividend yield at 1.35% vs WLFC's 0.35%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $297.67 | $65.00 | $165.00 | $212.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 20 | 25 | 14 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | +1.3% | +0.8% | +1.2% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 13 | 2 | 18 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.23 | $0.87 | $1.09 | $2.36 | $0.81 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% | +0.2% |
AER leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FTAI leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
FTAI vs AL vs AER vs GATX vs WLFC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FTAI or AL or AER or GATX or WLFC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FTAI Aviation Ltd.
(FTAI) is the stronger pick with 43. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 4% for AerCap Holdings N. V. (AER). AerCap Holdings N. V. (AER) offers the better valuation at 6. 8x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FTAI Aviation Ltd. (FTAI) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FTAI or AL or AER or GATX or WLFC?
On trailing P/E, AerCap Holdings N.
V. (AER) is the cheapest at 6. 8x versus FTAI Aviation Ltd. at 53. 1x. On forward P/E, AerCap Holdings N. V. is actually cheaper at 8. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Willis Lease Finance Corporation wins at 0. 23x versus GATX Corporation's 0. 88x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FTAI or AL or AER or GATX or WLFC?
Over the past 5 years, FTAI Aviation Ltd.
(FTAI) delivered a total return of +959. 5%, compared to +42. 1% for Air Lease Corporation (AL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FTAI returned +29. 1% versus AL's +136. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FTAI or AL or AER or GATX or WLFC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Air Lease Corporation (AL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
30β versus FTAI Aviation Ltd. 's 1. 79β — meaning FTAI is approximately 502% more volatile than AL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Air Lease Corporation (AL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 10% for FTAI Aviation Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FTAI or AL or AER or GATX or WLFC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FTAI Aviation Ltd.
(FTAI) is pulling ahead at 43. 2% versus 2. 4% for AerCap Holdings N. V. (AER). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FTAI Aviation Ltd. grew EPS 1538% year-over-year, compared to 0. 3% for Willis Lease Finance Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FTAI leads at 51. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FTAI or AL or AER or GATX or WLFC?
AerCap Holdings N.
V. (AER) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 8% net margin versus 16. 8% for Willis Lease Finance Corporation — meaning it keeps 45. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AER leads at 51. 9% versus 29. 9% for GATX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WLFC leads at 65. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FTAI or AL or AER or GATX or WLFC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 23x versus GATX Corporation's 0. 88x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, AerCap Holdings N. V. (AER) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 33. 3x for FTAI Aviation Ltd. — 24. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FTAI: 21. 8% to $297. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — FTAI or AL or AER or GATX or WLFC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Air Lease Corporation (AL) offers the highest yield at 1. 3%, versus 0. 4% for Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC).
09Is FTAI or AL or AER or GATX or WLFC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Air Lease Corporation (AL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
30), 1. 3% yield, +136. 6% 10Y return). FTAI Aviation Ltd. (FTAI) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AL: +136. 6%, FTAI: +29. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FTAI and AL and AER and GATX and WLFC?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FTAI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AL is a small-cap deep-value stock; AER is a mid-cap deep-value stock; GATX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WLFC is a small-cap high-growth stock. FTAI, AL, AER, GATX pay a dividend while WLFC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.