Personal Products & Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FTDR vs SERV vs BLD vs CART vs DASH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Engineering & Construction
Specialty Retail
Internet Content & Information
FTDR vs SERV vs BLD vs CART vs DASH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Personal Products & Services | Industrial - Machinery | Engineering & Construction | Specialty Retail | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $4.76B | $560M | $12.05B | $8.99B | $74.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.12B | $5M | $5.62B | $3.86B | $14.72B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $260M | $-137M | $503M | $485M | $925M |
| Gross Margin | 54.3% | -441.1% | 28.8% | 73.0% | 50.9% |
| Operating Margin | 22.1% | -28.8% | 14.1% | 15.9% | 4.9% |
| Forward P/E | 15.2x | — | 23.5x | 15.8x | 67.3x |
| Total Debt | $1.21B | $5M | $3.15B | $36M | $3.75B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $566M | $106M | $185M | $637M | $4.38B |
FTDR vs SERV vs BLD vs CART vs DASH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frontdoor, Inc. (FTDR) | 100 | 208.5 | +108.5% |
| Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV) | 100 | 176.5 | +76.5% |
| TopBuild Corp. (BLD) | 100 | 97.1 | -2.9% |
| Instacart (Maplebea… (CART) | 100 | 101.9 | +1.9% |
| DoorDash, Inc. (DASH) | 100 | 124.4 | +24.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FTDR vs SERV vs BLD vs CART vs DASH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FTDR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.72 vs BLD's 1.19
- Lower P/E (15.2x vs 67.3x)
SERV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 46.3% revenue growth vs BLD's 1.5%
- +51.8% vs CART's -16.9%
BLD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 12.2% 10Y total return vs SERV's 70.9%
CART carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.39
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 1.4%, current ratio 2.40x
- Beta 0.39, current ratio 2.40x
- 12.6% margin vs SERV's -26.4%
DASH is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 27.9%, EPS growth 6.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 46.3% revenue growth vs BLD's 1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.2x vs 67.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.6% margin vs SERV's -26.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs SERV's 4.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +51.8% vs CART's -16.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.0% ROA vs SERV's -44.9%, ROIC 24.0% vs -64.9% |
FTDR vs SERV vs BLD vs CART vs DASH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FTDR vs SERV vs BLD vs CART vs DASH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FTDR leads in 2 of 6 categories
CART leads 1 • SERV leads 0 • BLD leads 0 • DASH leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CART leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DASH is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.7B annually — 2833.9x SERV's $5M. CART is the more profitable business, keeping 12.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SERV's -26.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $5M | $5.6B | $3.9B | $14.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $554M | -$142M | $981M | $721M | $1.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $260M | -$137M | $503M | $485M | $925M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $385M | -$148M | $704M | $883M | $1.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.3% | -4.4% | +28.8% | +73.0% | +50.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.1% | -28.8% | +14.1% | +15.9% | +4.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | -26.4% | +9.0% | +12.6% | +6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.2% | -28.5% | +12.5% | +22.9% | +11.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.9% | +5.8% | +17.2% | +13.6% | +33.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.8% | -80.6% | -11.8% | +50.0% | -4.5% |
Valuation Metrics
FTDR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.9x trailing earnings, FTDR trades at a 75% valuation discount to DASH's 80.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FTDR offers better value at 0.94x vs BLD's 1.19x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.8B | $560M | $12.0B | $9.0B | $74.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.4B | $459M | $15.0B | $8.4B | $74.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.86x | -5.58x | 23.43x | 23.74x | 80.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.17x | — | 23.52x | 15.82x | 67.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.94x | — | 1.19x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.06x | — | 15.62x | 12.43x | 50.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.28x | 211.40x | 2.23x | 2.40x | 5.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 20.91x | 1.61x | 5.20x | 4.22x | 7.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.24x | — | 17.29x | 9.87x | 34.34x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FTDR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTDR delivers a 99.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $100 in annual profit, vs $-47 for SERV. CART carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FTDR's 5.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FTDR scores 8/9 vs SERV's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +99.9% | -47.3% | +22.1% | +16.3% | +9.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.9% | -44.9% | +8.1% | +12.0% | +5.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +31.2% | -64.9% | +13.7% | +24.0% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +23.0% | -46.3% | +16.1% | +18.9% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.01x | 0.01x | 1.36x | 0.01x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $646M | -$101M | $3.0B | -$601M | -$627M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $566M | $106M | $185M | $637M | $4.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $5M | $3.2B | $36M | $3.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.24x | -14706.75x | 6.47x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — BLD and DASH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BLD five years ago would be worth $19,116 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,273 for CART. Over the past 12 months, SERV leads with a +51.8% total return vs CART's -16.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DASH at 36.9% vs CART's 4.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.1% | -23.2% | -0.8% | -13.5% | -22.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +28.1% | +51.8% | +50.2% | -16.9% | -3.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +124.4% | +70.9% | +99.7% | +12.7% | +156.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.0% | +70.9% | +91.2% | +12.7% | +37.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +126.4% | +70.9% | +1219.2% | +12.7% | -9.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.9% | +19.6% | +25.9% | +4.1% | +36.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FTDR and CART each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CART is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SERV's 4.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FTDR currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs SERV's 48.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 4.09x | 1.47x | 0.39x | 1.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $70.77 | $18.64 | $559.47 | $53.50 | $285.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $48.47 | $5.87 | $273.87 | $32.73 | $143.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.0% | +48.8% | +76.5% | +71.0% | +60.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.8 | 53.6 | 55.7 | 45.9 | 47.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 689K | 3.7M | 629K | 3.9M | 4.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FTDR as "Hold", SERV as "Buy", BLD as "Buy", CART as "Buy", DASH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 79.6% upside for SERV (target: $16) vs 2.1% for FTDR (target: $69).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $69.33 | $16.33 | $537.80 | $49.70 | $253.35 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 20 | 29 | 26 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.9% | 0.0% | +3.6% | +15.4% | 0.0% |
FTDR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CART leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
FTDR vs SERV vs BLD vs CART vs DASH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FTDR or SERV or BLD or CART or DASH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Serve Robotics Inc.
(SERV) is the stronger pick with 46. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for TopBuild Corp. (BLD). Frontdoor, Inc. (FTDR) offers the better valuation at 19. 9x trailing P/E (15. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FTDR or SERV or BLD or CART or DASH?
On trailing P/E, Frontdoor, Inc.
(FTDR) is the cheapest at 19. 9x versus DoorDash, Inc. at 80. 4x. On forward P/E, Frontdoor, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Frontdoor, Inc. wins at 0. 72x versus TopBuild Corp. 's 1. 19x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FTDR or SERV or BLD or CART or DASH?
Over the past 5 years, TopBuild Corp.
(BLD) delivered a total return of +91. 2%, compared to +12. 7% for Instacart (Maplebear Inc. ) (CART). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLD returned +1219% versus DASH's -9. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FTDR or SERV or BLD or CART or DASH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Instacart (Maplebear Inc.
) (CART) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Serve Robotics Inc. 's 4. 09β — meaning SERV is approximately 959% more volatile than CART relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Instacart (Maplebear Inc. ) (CART) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 5% for Frontdoor, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FTDR or SERV or BLD or CART or DASH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Serve Robotics Inc.
(SERV) is pulling ahead at 46. 3% versus 1. 5% for TopBuild Corp. (BLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DoorDash, Inc. grew EPS 634. 5% year-over-year, compared to -52. 3% for Serve Robotics Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SERV leads at 190. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FTDR or SERV or BLD or CART or DASH?
Frontdoor, Inc.
(FTDR) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 2% net margin versus -38. 2% for Serve Robotics Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FTDR leads at 19. 1% versus -42. 5% for SERV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CART leads at 73. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FTDR or SERV or BLD or CART or DASH more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Frontdoor, Inc. (FTDR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 72x versus TopBuild Corp. 's 1. 19x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Frontdoor, Inc. (FTDR) trades at 15. 2x forward P/E versus 67. 3x for DoorDash, Inc. — 52. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SERV: 79. 6% to $16. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — FTDR or SERV or BLD or CART or DASH?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is FTDR or SERV or BLD or CART or DASH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Instacart (Maplebear Inc.
) (CART) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39)). Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV) carries a higher beta of 4. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CART: +12. 7%, SERV: +70. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FTDR and SERV and BLD and CART and DASH?
These companies operate in different sectors (FTDR (Consumer Cyclical) and SERV (Industrials) and BLD (Industrials) and CART (Consumer Cyclical) and DASH (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FTDR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SERV is a small-cap high-growth stock; BLD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CART is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DASH is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.