Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FTEL vs NAUT vs CDNA vs XPOF

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FTEL
Fitell Corporation

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • AU
Market Cap$791K
5Y Perf.-97.7%
NAUT
Nautilus Biotechnology, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$341M
5Y Perf.-25.1%
CDNA
CareDx, Inc

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.13B
5Y Perf.+101.5%
XPOF
Xponential Fitness, Inc.

Leisure

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$209M
5Y Perf.-80.3%

FTEL vs NAUT vs CDNA vs XPOF — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FTEL logoFTEL
NAUT logoNAUT
CDNA logoCDNA
XPOF logoXPOF
IndustrySpecialty RetailBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchLeisure
Market Cap$791K$341M$1.13B$209M
Revenue (TTM)$9M$0.00$413M$299M
Net Income (TTM)$-13M$-57M$-8M$-34M
Gross Margin27.0%48.2%83.2%
Operating Margin-114.7%-3.3%7.8%
Forward P/E23.3x9.4x
Total Debt$580K$30M$20M$525M
Cash & Equiv.$939K$12M$65M$34M

FTEL vs NAUT vs CDNA vs XPOFLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FTEL
NAUT
CDNA
XPOF
StockAug 23Mar 26Return
Fitell Corporation (FTEL)1002.3-97.7%
Nautilus Biotechnol… (NAUT)10074.9-25.1%
CareDx, Inc (CDNA)100201.5+101.5%
Xponential Fitness,… (XPOF)10019.7-80.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FTEL vs NAUT vs CDNA vs XPOF

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NAUT and CDNA are tied at the top with 2 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. CareDx, Inc is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and operational efficiency and capital deployment. XPOF and FTEL also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FTEL
Fitell Corporation
The Income Pick

FTEL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.19
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.19, Low D/E 6.4%, current ratio 4.22x
  • Beta 1.19, current ratio 4.22x
  • Beta 1.19 vs XPOF's 1.79
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
NAUT
Nautilus Biotechnology, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

NAUT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and momentum.

  • 4.1% margin vs FTEL's -141.4%
  • +275.1% vs FTEL's -78.7%
Best for: quality and momentum
CDNA
CareDx, Inc
The Long-Run Compounder

CDNA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 393.7% 10Y total return vs XPOF's -54.3%
  • 13.8% revenue growth vs FTEL's -6.9%
  • -1.9% ROA vs FTEL's -126.4%, ROIC -5.7% vs -77.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
XPOF
Xponential Fitness, Inc.
The Growth Play

XPOF is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth -1.7%, EPS growth 35.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.0%
  • Lower P/E (9.4x vs 23.3x)
  • 2.9% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCDNA logoCDNA13.8% revenue growth vs FTEL's -6.9%
ValueXPOF logoXPOFLower P/E (9.4x vs 23.3x)
Quality / MarginsNAUT logoNAUT4.1% margin vs FTEL's -141.4%
Stability / SafetyFTEL logoFTELBeta 1.19 vs XPOF's 1.79
DividendsXPOF logoXPOF2.9% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NAUT logoNAUT+275.1% vs FTEL's -78.7%
Efficiency (ROA)CDNA logoCDNA-1.9% ROA vs FTEL's -126.4%, ROIC -5.7% vs -77.3%

FTEL vs NAUT vs CDNA vs XPOF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FTELFitell Corporation
FY 2024
Merchandise Revenue
0.0%$0
NAUTNautilus Biotechnology, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CDNACareDx, Inc
FY 2025
Service
85.0%$274M
Product
15.0%$48M
XPOFXponential Fitness, Inc.
FY 2025
Franchise
50.7%$193M
Product
11.2%$42M
Franchise Marketing Fund Revenue
9.6%$36M
Equipment Revenue
9.2%$35M
Service, Other
7.1%$27M
Merchandise Revenue
6.3%$24M
Franchise And Service Revenue
5.9%$22M

FTEL vs NAUT vs CDNA vs XPOF — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCDNALAGGINGXPOF

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CDNA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

CDNA and NAUT operate at a comparable scale, with $413M and $0 in trailing revenue. CDNA is the more profitable business, keeping -2.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FTEL's -141.4%. On growth, CDNA holds the edge at +39.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFTEL logoFTELFitell CorporationNAUT logoNAUTNautilus Biotechn…CDNA logoCDNACareDx, IncXPOF logoXPOFXponential Fitnes…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$9M$0$413M$299M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$10M-$58M$2M$35M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$13M-$57M-$8M-$34M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$13M-$51M$65M-$3M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+27.0%+48.2%+83.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-114.7%-3.3%+7.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-141.4%-2.0%-11.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-148.4%+15.8%-1.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+24.7%+39.0%-21.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+67.8%+7.7%+126.3%+79.8%
CDNA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — FTEL and XPOF each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
MetricFTEL logoFTELFitell CorporationNAUT logoNAUTNautilus Biotechn…CDNA logoCDNACareDx, IncXPOF logoXPOFXponential Fitnes…
Market CapShares × price$791,005$341M$1.1B$209M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$432,344$358M$1.1B$700M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.12x-5.70x-54.55x-3.81x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.23.25x9.37x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.64x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.18x2.97x0.66x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.09x2.16x3.84x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF31.21x8.45x
Evenly matched — FTEL and XPOF each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — CDNA and XPOF each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

CDNA delivers a -2.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-169 for FTEL. FTEL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NAUT's 0.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CDNA scores 5/9 vs NAUT's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricFTEL logoFTELFitell CorporationNAUT logoNAUTNautilus Biotechn…CDNA logoCDNACareDx, IncXPOF logoXPOFXponential Fitnes…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-169.3%-35.0%-2.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-126.4%-29.2%-1.9%-9.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-77.3%-26.0%-5.7%+69.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-98.5%-32.0%-5.8%+30.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92155
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.06x0.19x0.06x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$358,661$18M-$46M$491M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$939,014$12M$65M$34M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$580,353$30M$20M$525M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-9.50x-0.05x
Evenly matched — CDNA and XPOF each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CDNA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in XPOF five years ago would be worth $4,571 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $466 for FTEL. Over the past 12 months, NAUT leads with a +275.1% total return vs FTEL's -78.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CDNA at 38.5% vs FTEL's -64.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFTEL logoFTELFitell CorporationNAUT logoNAUTNautilus Biotechn…CDNA logoCDNACareDx, IncXPOF logoXPOFXponential Fitnes…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+62.9%+40.3%+14.0%-30.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-78.7%+275.1%+41.8%-35.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-95.3%+12.6%+165.8%-80.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-95.3%-73.4%-67.3%-54.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-95.3%-74.3%+393.7%-54.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-64.0%+4.0%+38.5%-42.2%
CDNA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FTEL and CDNA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FTEL is the less volatile stock with a 1.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than XPOF's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CDNA currently trades 93.9% from its 52-week high vs FTEL's 4.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFTEL logoFTELFitell CorporationNAUT logoNAUTNautilus Biotechn…CDNA logoCDNACareDx, IncXPOF logoXPOFXponential Fitnes…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.19x1.77x1.36x1.79x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$19.20$4.31$23.24$11.14
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.40$0.62$10.96$3.83
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+4.7%+62.2%+93.9%+50.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10030.350.559.046.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded122K314K658K632K
Evenly matched — FTEL and CDNA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

FTEL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: NAUT as "Buy", CDNA as "Buy", XPOF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.0% upside for XPOF (target: $7) vs -6.7% for NAUT (target: $3). XPOF is the only dividend payer here at 2.92% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricFTEL logoFTELFitell CorporationNAUT logoNAUTNautilus Biotechn…CDNA logoCDNACareDx, IncXPOF logoXPOFXponential Fitnes…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$2.50$24.00$7.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts51314
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.16
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+7.8%0.0%
FTEL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CDNA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). FTEL leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.

Best OverallCareDx, Inc (CDNA)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FTEL vs NAUT vs CDNA vs XPOF: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FTEL or NAUT or CDNA or XPOF a better buy right now?

For growth investors, CareDx, Inc (CDNA) is the stronger pick with 13.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 9% for Fitell Corporation (FTEL). Analysts rate Nautilus Biotechnology, Inc. (NAUT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — FTEL or NAUT or CDNA or XPOF?

Over the past 5 years, Xponential Fitness, Inc.

(XPOF) delivered a total return of -54. 3%, compared to -95. 3% for Fitell Corporation (FTEL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CDNA returned +393. 7% versus FTEL's -95. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — FTEL or NAUT or CDNA or XPOF?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fitell Corporation (FTEL) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

19β versus Xponential Fitness, Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning XPOF is approximately 50% more volatile than FTEL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fitell Corporation (FTEL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 19% for Nautilus Biotechnology, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — FTEL or NAUT or CDNA or XPOF?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CareDx, Inc (CDNA) is pulling ahead at 13.

8% versus -6. 9% for Fitell Corporation (FTEL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Xponential Fitness, Inc. grew EPS 35. 2% year-over-year, compared to -228. 6% for Fitell Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, XPOF leads at 9. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — FTEL or NAUT or CDNA or XPOF?

Nautilus Biotechnology, Inc.

(NAUT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -208. 5% for Fitell Corporation — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XPOF leads at 25. 3% versus -179. 1% for FTEL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XPOF leads at 75. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is FTEL or NAUT or CDNA or XPOF more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Xponential Fitness, Inc.

(XPOF) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 23. 3x for CareDx, Inc — 13. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XPOF: 25. 0% to $7. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — FTEL or NAUT or CDNA or XPOF?

In this comparison, XPOF (2.

9% yield) pays a dividend. FTEL, NAUT, CDNA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is FTEL or NAUT or CDNA or XPOF better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CareDx, Inc (CDNA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+393.

7% 10Y return). Nautilus Biotechnology, Inc. (NAUT) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CDNA: +393. 7%, NAUT: -74. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between FTEL and NAUT and CDNA and XPOF?

These companies operate in different sectors (FTEL (Consumer Cyclical) and NAUT (Healthcare) and CDNA (Healthcare) and XPOF (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

XPOF pays a dividend while FTEL, NAUT, CDNA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FTEL

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 12%
  • Gross Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NAUT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CDNA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
  • Gross Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

XPOF

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 49%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.