FTHM vs WELL

For growth investors, Welltower Inc.

(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 9% for Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM). Welltower Inc. (WELL) offers the better valuation at 154. 2x trailing P/E (78. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Welltower Inc. (WELL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.

(WELL) delivered a total return of +212. 6%, compared to -97. 4% for Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +230. 2% versus FTHM's -91. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Welltower Inc.

(WELL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus Fathom Holdings Inc. 's 2. 42β — meaning FTHM is approximately 1718% more volatile than WELL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 42% versus 49% for Welltower Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.

(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus -2. 9% for Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fathom Holdings Inc. grew EPS 27. 2% year-over-year, compared to -11. 5% for Welltower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Welltower Inc.

(WELL) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 8% net margin versus -6. 4% for Fathom Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WELL leads at 3. 3% versus -7. 0% for FTHM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WELL leads at 39. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, WELL (1.

3% yield) pays a dividend. FTHM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Welltower Inc.

(WELL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13), 1. 3% yield, +230. 2% 10Y return). Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM) carries a higher beta of 2. 42 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WELL: +230. 2%, FTHM: -91. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FTHM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. WELL pays a dividend while FTHM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.