Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FTLF vs HIMS vs TDOC vs SMPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Equipment & Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Packaged Foods
FTLF vs HIMS vs TDOC vs SMPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Medical - Equipment & Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $90M | $6.63B | $1.26B | $1.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $71M | $2.35B | $2.51B | $1.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $128M | $-171M | $91M |
| Gross Margin | 40.7% | 69.7% | 65.6% | 34.0% |
| Operating Margin | 15.1% | 4.6% | -7.6% | 14.4% |
| Forward P/E | 7.0x | 51.5x | — | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $1.12B | $1.04B | $304M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $229M | $781M | $98M |
FTLF vs HIMS vs TDOC vs SMPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FitLife Brands, Inc. (FTLF) | 100 | 692.8 | +592.8% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 258.4 | +158.4% |
| Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) | 100 | 4.0 | -96.0% |
| The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL) | 100 | 73.0 | -27.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FTLF vs HIMS vs TDOC vs SMPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FTLF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.34
- 175.5% 10Y total return vs HIMS's 161.9%
- PEG 0.27 vs SMPL's 0.31
- Lower P/E (7.0x vs 7.5x), PEG 0.27 vs 0.31
HIMS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs TDOC's -1.5%
TDOC is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +1.5% vs SMPL's -64.8%
SMPL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 16.8%, current ratio 3.64x
- Beta 0.38, current ratio 3.64x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs TDOC's -1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 7.5x), PEG 0.27 vs 0.31 | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.6% margin vs TDOC's -6.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +1.5% vs SMPL's -64.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs TDOC's -5.9%, ROIC 21.6% vs -11.5% |
FTLF vs HIMS vs TDOC vs SMPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FTLF vs HIMS vs TDOC vs SMPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FTLF leads in 2 of 6 categories
TDOC leads 1 • HIMS leads 1 • SMPL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FTLF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDOC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 35.6x FTLF's $71M. FTLF is the more profitable business, keeping 9.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TDOC's -6.8%. On growth, FTLF holds the edge at +47.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $71M | $2.3B | $2.5B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | $164M | $42M | $231M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $128M | -$171M | $91M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8M | $73M | $251M | $174M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.7% | +69.7% | +65.6% | +34.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.1% | +4.6% | -7.6% | +14.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.6% | +5.5% | -6.8% | +6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +3.1% | +10.0% | +12.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +47.0% | +28.4% | -2.5% | -0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -57.1% | -27.3% | +32.1% | -31.6% |
Valuation Metrics
TDOC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.5x trailing earnings, FTLF trades at a 79% valuation discount to HIMS's 50.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FTLF offers better value at 0.41x vs SMPL's 0.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $90M | $6.6B | $1.3B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $99M | $7.5B | $1.5B | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.53x | 50.32x | -6.11x | 12.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.00x | 51.51x | — | 7.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.41x | — | — | 0.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.47x | 42.68x | 15.13x | 5.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.39x | 2.82x | 0.50x | 0.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.62x | 12.25x | 0.89x | 0.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.35x | 89.61x | 4.40x | 7.86x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FTLF leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HIMS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-12 for TDOC. SMPL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FTLF scores 8/9 vs HIMS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.1% | +23.7% | -12.4% | +5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.1% | +6.0% | -5.9% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.6% | +10.7% | -11.5% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +28.4% | +10.9% | -10.0% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 2.07x | 0.75x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9M | $892M | $259M | $206M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $229M | $781M | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $1.1B | $1.0B | $304M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.14x | — | -8.76x | 6.77x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HIMS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $23,764 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $461 for TDOC. Over the past 12 months, TDOC leads with a +1.5% total return vs SMPL's -64.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 29.4% vs TDOC's -35.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -39.3% | -23.2% | -1.3% | -36.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -39.9% | -51.0% | +1.5% | -64.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.8% | +116.6% | -73.3% | -67.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +93.5% | +137.6% | -95.4% | -64.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +175.5% | +161.9% | -41.1% | +3.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.5% | +29.4% | -35.6% | -31.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FTLF and TDOC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FTLF is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TDOC currently trades 71.2% from its 52-week high vs SMPL's 33.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.34x | 2.40x | 1.91x | 0.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.98 | $70.43 | $9.77 | $36.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.67 | $13.74 | $4.40 | $10.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.6% | +36.4% | +71.2% | +33.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.2 | 54.5 | 74.1 | 42.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 28K | 34.9M | 5.5M | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FTLF as "Buy", HIMS as "Hold", TDOC as "Hold", SMPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 219.0% upside for FTLF (target: $31) vs 8.9% for TDOC (target: $8).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $30.50 | $29.67 | $7.58 | $20.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 19 | 42 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% | 0.0% | +4.1% |
FTLF leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TDOC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
FTLF vs HIMS vs TDOC vs SMPL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FTLF or HIMS or TDOC or SMPL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC). FitLife Brands, Inc. (FTLF) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FitLife Brands, Inc. (FTLF) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FTLF or HIMS or TDOC or SMPL?
On trailing P/E, FitLife Brands, Inc.
(FTLF) is the cheapest at 10. 5x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 50. 3x. On forward P/E, FitLife Brands, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: FitLife Brands, Inc. wins at 0. 27x versus The Simply Good Foods Company's 0. 31x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FTLF or HIMS or TDOC or SMPL?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +137. 6%, compared to -95. 4% for Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FTLF returned +175. 5% versus TDOC's -41. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FTLF or HIMS or TDOC or SMPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FitLife Brands, Inc.
(FTLF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 607% more volatile than FTLF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FTLF or HIMS or TDOC or SMPL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -1. 5% for Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teladoc Health, Inc. grew EPS 80. 6% year-over-year, compared to -26. 1% for The Simply Good Foods Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FTLF or HIMS or TDOC or SMPL?
FitLife Brands, Inc.
(FTLF) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 9% net margin versus -7. 9% for Teladoc Health, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FTLF leads at 20. 3% versus -10. 4% for TDOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TDOC leads at 69. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FTLF or HIMS or TDOC or SMPL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, FitLife Brands, Inc. (FTLF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 27x versus The Simply Good Foods Company's 0. 31x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, FitLife Brands, Inc. (FTLF) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 51. 5x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 44. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FTLF: 219. 0% to $30. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — FTLF or HIMS or TDOC or SMPL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is FTLF or HIMS or TDOC or SMPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, FitLife Brands, Inc.
(FTLF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34), +175. 5% 10Y return). Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FTLF: +175. 5%, TDOC: -41. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FTLF and HIMS and TDOC and SMPL?
These companies operate in different sectors (FTLF (Consumer Defensive) and HIMS (Healthcare) and TDOC (Healthcare) and SMPL (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FTLF is a small-cap high-growth stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; TDOC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.