Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FTRK vs NFLX vs DIS vs RCMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Conglomerates
FTRK vs NFLX vs DIS vs RCMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Entertainment | Entertainment | Conglomerates |
| Market Cap | $7M | $374.00B | $192.60B | $203M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $45.18B | $97.26B | $319M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-321K | $10.98B | $11.22B | $16M |
| Gross Margin | 12.8% | 48.5% | 37.2% | 27.2% |
| Operating Margin | -35.7% | 29.5% | 15.5% | 7.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 24.8x | 16.5x | 12.3x |
| Total Debt | $27K | $14.46B | $44.88B | $26M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $268K | $9.03B | $5.70B | $3M |
FTRK vs NFLX vs DIS vs RCMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fast Track Group (FTRK) | 100 | 8.2 | -91.8% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 73.1 | -26.9% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 96.2 | -3.8% |
| RCM Technologies, I… (RCMT) | 100 | 124.9 | +24.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FTRK vs NFLX vs DIS vs RCMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FTRK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs RCMT's 466.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
- Beta 0.39, current ratio 1.19x
DIS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 0.9%
- 0.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
RCMT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (12.3x vs 16.5x)
- +59.5% vs FTRK's -87.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs FTRK's -21.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.3x vs 16.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs FTRK's -31.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs FTRK's 1.49 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +59.5% vs FTRK's -87.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs FTRK's -23.6% |
FTRK vs NFLX vs DIS vs RCMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FTRK vs NFLX vs DIS vs RCMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NFLX leads in 2 of 6 categories
RCMT leads 1 • FTRK leads 0 • DIS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $97.3B annually — 96744.2x FTRK's $1M. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FTRK's -31.9%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $45.2B | $97.3B | $319M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $33,208 | $30.1B | $20.5B | $27M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$321,093 | $11.0B | $11.2B | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $426,254 | $9.5B | $7.1B | $17M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.8% | +48.5% | +37.2% | +27.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -35.7% | +29.5% | +15.5% | +7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -31.9% | +24.3% | +11.5% | +5.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +42.4% | +20.9% | +7.3% | +5.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.2% | +17.6% | +6.5% | +12.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +31.1% | -29.8% | +116.2% |
Valuation Metrics
RCMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.3x trailing earnings, RCMT trades at a 62% valuation discount to NFLX's 34.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RCMT's 8.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NFLX's 12.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $374.0B | $192.6B | $203M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $379.4B | $231.8B | $226M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -19.52x | 34.89x | 15.87x | 13.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.80x | 16.53x | 12.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.61x | 12.10x | 8.01x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.73x | 8.28x | 2.04x | 0.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 14.32x | 1.72x | 4.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.76x | 39.53x | 19.11x | 11.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $10 for DIS. DIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RCMT's 0.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIS scores 8/9 vs FTRK's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +41.3% | +9.8% | +40.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -23.6% | +19.8% | +5.6% | +12.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +29.8% | +6.9% | +26.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +30.5% | +8.5% | +31.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.54x | 0.39x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$241,742 | $5.4B | $39.2B | $23M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $268,436 | $9.0B | $5.7B | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26,694 | $14.5B | $44.9B | $26M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.65x | 17.33x | 9.95x | 9.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — NFLX and RCMT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RCMT five years ago would be worth $81,222 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,216 for FTRK. Over the past 12 months, RCMT leads with a +59.5% total return vs FTRK's -87.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs FTRK's -50.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -51.9% | -3.0% | -2.8% | +44.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -87.8% | -23.6% | +7.7% | +59.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.8% | +166.5% | +8.0% | +134.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.8% | +75.2% | -39.8% | +712.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.8% | +875.3% | +11.8% | +466.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.5% | +38.6% | +2.6% | +32.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NFLX and RCMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FTRK's 1.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RCMT currently trades 88.0% from its 52-week high vs FTRK's 4.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.49x | 0.39x | 0.90x | 1.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.69 | $134.12 | $124.69 | $32.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.29 | $75.01 | $92.19 | $17.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +4.1% | +65.8% | +87.2% | +88.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.0 | 35.3 | 64.4 | 59.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 55K | 44.0M | 9.1M | 67K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NFLX as "Buy", DIS as "Buy", RCMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.8% upside for NFLX (target: $116) vs 28.3% for DIS (target: $140). DIS is the only dividend payer here at 0.92% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $116.29 | $139.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 99 | 63 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% | +1.8% | +3.6% |
NFLX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RCMT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
FTRK vs NFLX vs DIS vs RCMT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FTRK or NFLX or DIS or RCMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -21. 5% for Fast Track Group (FTRK). RCM Technologies, Inc. (RCMT) offers the better valuation at 13. 3x trailing P/E (12. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FTRK or NFLX or DIS or RCMT?
On trailing P/E, RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) is the cheapest at 13. 3x versus Netflix, Inc. at 34. 9x. On forward P/E, RCM Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FTRK or NFLX or DIS or RCMT?
Over the past 5 years, RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) delivered a total return of +712. 2%, compared to -87. 8% for Fast Track Group (FTRK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus FTRK's -87. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FTRK or NFLX or DIS or RCMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Fast Track Group's 1. 49β — meaning FTRK is approximately 282% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 56% for RCM Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FTRK or NFLX or DIS or RCMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus -21. 5% for Fast Track Group (FTRK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Walt Disney Company grew EPS 151. 8% year-over-year, compared to 27. 6% for Netflix, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NFLX leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FTRK or NFLX or DIS or RCMT?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus -44. 6% for Fast Track Group — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -42. 1% for FTRK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NFLX leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FTRK or NFLX or DIS or RCMT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) trades at 12. 3x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Netflix, Inc. — 12. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 31. 8% to $116. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — FTRK or NFLX or DIS or RCMT?
In this comparison, DIS (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. FTRK, NFLX, RCMT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FTRK or NFLX or DIS or RCMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, FTRK: -87. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FTRK and NFLX and DIS and RCMT?
These companies operate in different sectors (FTRK (Communication Services) and NFLX (Communication Services) and DIS (Communication Services) and RCMT (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FTRK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; RCMT is a small-cap deep-value stock. DIS pays a dividend while FTRK, NFLX, RCMT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.