Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FURY vs CAT vs DE vs VZLA vs CNH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Agricultural - Machinery
Industrial Materials
Agricultural - Machinery
FURY vs CAT vs DE vs VZLA vs CNH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Industrial Materials | Agricultural - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $113M | $416.75B | $157.32B | $1.18B | $13.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $70.75B | $45.88B | $0.00 | $18.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-109M | $9.42B | $4.08B | $-16M | $386M |
| Gross Margin | — | 32.5% | 34.7% | — | 31.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 16.6% | 17.0% | — | 14.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 38.8x | 32.5x | — | 26.1x |
| Total Debt | $65K | $43.33B | $63.94B | $0.00 | $27.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $9.98B | $8.28B | $133M | $3.23B |
FURY vs CAT vs DE vs VZLA vs CNH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fury Gold Mines Lim… (FURY) | 100 | 89.5 | -10.5% |
| Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) | 100 | 444.4 | +344.4% |
| Deere & Company (DE) | 100 | 154.2 | +54.2% |
| Vizsla Silver Corp. (VZLA) | 100 | 179.6 | +79.6% |
| CNH Industrial N.V. (CNH) | 100 | 71.6 | -28.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FURY vs CAT vs DE vs VZLA vs CNH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FURY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.3%, EPS growth -14.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.4%
- 12.3% 10Y total return vs DE's 6.7%
- PEG 1.38 vs DE's 1.99
- 4.3% revenue growth vs FURY's -9.2%
DE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.56, yield 1.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, current ratio 2.31x
- Beta 0.56 vs CAT's 1.54
Among these 5 stocks, VZLA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CNH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 1.15, yield 2.5%, current ratio 7.75x
- Better valuation composite
- 2.5% yield, vs DE's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.3% revenue growth vs FURY's -9.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.3% margin vs FURY's 0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs CAT's 1.54 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, vs DE's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +181.5% vs CNH's -9.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.0% ROA vs FURY's -125.8%, ROIC 15.9% vs -4.4% |
FURY vs CAT vs DE vs VZLA vs CNH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FURY vs CAT vs DE vs VZLA vs CNH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CAT leads in 3 of 6 categories
CNH leads 1 • FURY leads 0 • DE leads 0 • VZLA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT and VZLA operate at a comparable scale, with $70.8B and $0 in trailing revenue. CAT is the more profitable business, keeping 13.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNH's 2.1%. On growth, CAT holds the edge at +22.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $70.8B | $45.9B | $0 | $18.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$15M | $14.0B | $9.5B | -$34M | $3.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$109M | $9.4B | $4.1B | -$16M | $386M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | $11.4B | $5.5B | -$45M | $1.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +32.5% | +34.7% | — | +31.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +16.6% | +17.0% | — | +14.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +13.3% | +8.9% | — | +2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +16.2% | +12.0% | — | +10.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +22.2% | +16.3% | — | -0.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.0% | +30.2% | -24.1% | +11.9% | -94.4% |
Valuation Metrics
CNH leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.4x trailing earnings, CNH trades at a 44% valuation discount to CAT's 47.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CAT offers better value at 1.69x vs DE's 1.92x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $113M | $416.8B | $157.3B | $1.2B | $13.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $109M | $450.1B | $213.0B | $1.1B | $37.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.11x | 47.57x | 31.37x | -159.19x | 26.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 38.79x | 32.53x | — | 26.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.69x | 1.92x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 33.41x | 20.01x | — | 10.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 6.17x | 3.52x | — | 0.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.55x | 19.71x | 6.06x | 3.06x | 1.73x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 40.56x | 48.69x | — | 6.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT delivers a 47.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $-135 for FURY. FURY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNH's 3.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CNH scores 6/9 vs FURY's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -135.1% | +47.5% | +15.5% | -3.1% | +4.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -125.8% | +10.0% | +3.9% | -3.1% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.4% | +15.9% | +7.7% | -7.2% | +6.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.4% | +19.1% | +11.4% | -7.2% | +8.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 2.03x | 2.46x | — | 3.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $33.4B | $55.7B | -$133M | $23.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $10.0B | $8.3B | $133M | $3.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $65,000 | $43.3B | $63.9B | $0 | $27.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9916.09x | 9.22x | 2.74x | — | 1.76x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CAT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CAT five years ago would be worth $38,251 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,440 for FURY. Over the past 12 months, CAT leads with a +181.5% total return vs CNH's -9.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAT at 62.0% vs CNH's -7.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.5% | +50.2% | +24.7% | -37.9% | +15.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +59.2% | +181.5% | +24.2% | +51.1% | -9.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.2% | +324.9% | +57.4% | +134.9% | -19.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.6% | +282.5% | +54.1% | +40.6% | -27.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.5% | +1227.6% | +671.0% | +40.6% | +87.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.3% | +62.0% | +16.3% | +32.9% | -7.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CAT and DE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DE is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAT's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAT currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs VZLA's 47.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.37x | 1.54x | 0.56x | 1.34x | 1.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.02 | $931.35 | $674.19 | $7.19 | $14.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.36 | $318.11 | $433.00 | $2.23 | $9.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.3% | +96.2% | +86.1% | +47.7% | +76.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 76.2 | 54.0 | 51.3 | 52.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 466K | 2.4M | 1.2M | 7.5M | 15.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CAT and DE and CNH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FURY as "Buy", CAT as "Buy", DE as "Hold", VZLA as "Buy", CNH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 236.1% upside for FURY (target: $2) vs -7.9% for CAT (target: $825). For income investors, CNH offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs CAT's 0.65%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.00 | $824.80 | $680.54 | $7.00 | $13.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 53 | 46 | 5 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | +1.1% | — | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 8 | 8 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.86 | $6.33 | — | $0.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% | +0.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CAT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CNH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
FURY vs CAT vs DE vs VZLA vs CNH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FURY or CAT or DE or VZLA or CNH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) is the stronger pick with 4. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 8% for CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH). CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH) offers the better valuation at 26. 4x trailing P/E (26. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fury Gold Mines Limited (FURY) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FURY or CAT or DE or VZLA or CNH?
On trailing P/E, CNH Industrial N.
V. (CNH) is the cheapest at 26. 4x versus Caterpillar Inc. at 47. 6x. On forward P/E, CNH Industrial N. V. is actually cheaper at 26. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Caterpillar Inc. wins at 1. 38x versus Deere & Company's 1. 99x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FURY or CAT or DE or VZLA or CNH?
Over the past 5 years, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) delivered a total return of +282. 5%, compared to -55. 6% for Fury Gold Mines Limited (FURY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAT returned +1228% versus FURY's -53. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FURY or CAT or DE or VZLA or CNH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Deere & Company (DE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
56β versus Caterpillar Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning CAT is approximately 173% more volatile than DE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fury Gold Mines Limited (FURY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for CNH Industrial N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FURY or CAT or DE or VZLA or CNH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) is pulling ahead at 4. 3% versus -8. 8% for CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vizsla Silver Corp. grew EPS 60. 9% year-over-year, compared to -508. 3% for Fury Gold Mines Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, CAT leads at 4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FURY or CAT or DE or VZLA or CNH?
Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 1% net margin versus 0. 0% for Vizsla Silver Corp. — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DE leads at 18. 8% versus 0. 0% for VZLA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DE leads at 36. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FURY or CAT or DE or VZLA or CNH more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 38x versus Deere & Company's 1. 99x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH) trades at 26. 1x forward P/E versus 38. 8x for Caterpillar Inc. — 12. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FURY: 236. 1% to $2. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FURY or CAT or DE or VZLA or CNH?
In this comparison, CNH (2.
5% yield), DE (1. 1% yield), CAT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. FURY, VZLA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FURY or CAT or DE or VZLA or CNH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Deere & Company (DE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
56), 1. 1% yield, +671. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DE: +671. 0%, FURY: -53. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FURY and CAT and DE and VZLA and CNH?
These companies operate in different sectors (FURY (Basic Materials) and CAT (Industrials) and DE (Industrials) and VZLA (Basic Materials) and CNH (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
CAT, DE, CNH pay a dividend while FURY, VZLA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.