Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FURY vs USAS vs EXK vs CDE vs HL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial Materials
Other Precious Metals
Gold
Gold
FURY vs USAS vs EXK vs CDE vs HL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Industrial Materials | Other Precious Metals | Gold | Gold |
| Market Cap | $113M | $2.03B | $2.99B | $11.63B | $12.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $109M | $330M | $2.57B | $1.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-109M | $-61M | $-94M | $799M | $559M |
| Gross Margin | — | 3.3% | 9.3% | 35.4% | 50.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -25.5% | -1.7% | 39.4% | 44.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 26.3x | 14.3x | 9.1x | 19.1x |
| Total Debt | $65K | $24M | $120M | $365M | $299M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $20M | $106M | $554M | $242M |
FURY vs USAS vs EXK vs CDE vs HL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fury Gold Mines Lim… (FURY) | 100 | 44.4 | -55.6% |
| Americas Gold and S… (USAS) | 100 | 128.6 | +28.6% |
| Endeavour Silver Co… (EXK) | 100 | 528.6 | +428.6% |
| Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) | 100 | 315.0 | +215.0% |
| Hecla Mining Company (HL) | 100 | 544.8 | +444.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FURY vs USAS vs EXK vs CDE vs HL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FURY is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 5.32x
USAS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +418.7% vs FURY's +59.2%
EXK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.71
CDE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 96.4%, EPS growth 5.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.1%
- 96.4% revenue growth vs FURY's -9.2%
- Lower P/E (9.1x vs 19.1x)
HL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and defensive.
- 360.6% 10Y total return vs EXK's 182.7%
- Beta 1.26, yield 0.1%, current ratio 2.72x
- 35.6% margin vs USAS's -56.2%
- Beta 1.26 vs USAS's 2.31, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 96.4% revenue growth vs FURY's -9.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 19.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.6% margin vs USAS's -56.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.26 vs USAS's 2.31, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +418.7% vs FURY's +59.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.3% ROA vs FURY's -125.8%, ROIC 15.3% vs -4.4% |
FURY vs USAS vs EXK vs CDE vs HL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FURY vs USAS vs EXK vs CDE vs HL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CDE leads in 2 of 6 categories
HL leads 1 • USAS leads 1 • FURY leads 0 • EXK leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CDE and FURY operate at a comparable scale, with $2.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. HL is the more profitable business, keeping 35.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to USAS's -56.2%. On growth, EXK holds the edge at +154.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $109M | $330M | $2.6B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$15M | -$7M | $49M | $1.2B | $853M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$109M | -$61M | -$94M | $799M | $559M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | -$52M | -$129M | $915M | $472M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +3.3% | +9.3% | +35.4% | +50.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -25.5% | -1.7% | +39.4% | +44.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -56.2% | -28.4% | +31.1% | +35.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -47.7% | -39.1% | +35.6% | +30.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +45.6% | +154.0% | +137.8% | +57.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.0% | +55.3% | -97.5% | +4.9% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CDE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.1x trailing earnings, CDE trades at a 45% valuation discount to HL's 36.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CDE's 11.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EXK's 76.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $113M | $2.0B | $3.0B | $11.6B | $12.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $109M | $2.0B | $3.0B | $11.4B | $12.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.11x | -15.19x | -78.08x | 20.13x | 36.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 26.30x | 14.34x | 9.10x | 19.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.39x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 76.02x | 11.19x | 17.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 20.24x | 13.72x | 5.62x | 8.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.55x | 12.65x | 5.07x | 3.56x | 4.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 17.48x | 39.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CDE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HL delivers a 22.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-135 for FURY. FURY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to USAS's 0.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HL scores 8/9 vs FURY's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -135.1% | -122.1% | -18.4% | +15.2% | +22.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -125.8% | -26.1% | -9.2% | +11.2% | +16.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.4% | -26.3% | +1.5% | +23.5% | +15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.4% | -21.6% | +1.6% | +23.9% | +16.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.45x | 0.25x | 0.11x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $4M | $14M | -$188M | $57M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $20M | $106M | $554M | $242M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $65,000 | $24M | $120M | $365M | $299M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9916.09x | -18.89x | -39.17x | 47.33x | 19.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
USAS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HL five years ago would be worth $25,033 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,440 for FURY. Over the past 12 months, USAS leads with a +418.7% total return vs FURY's +59.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors USAS at 80.8% vs FURY's 3.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.5% | +24.9% | +12.5% | +3.2% | -4.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +59.2% | +418.7% | +193.4% | +216.1% | +271.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.2% | +490.7% | +144.0% | +414.6% | +194.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.6% | +35.7% | +61.1% | +96.0% | +150.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.5% | -5.1% | +182.7% | +149.9% | +360.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.3% | +80.8% | +34.6% | +72.6% | +43.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EXK and HL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HL is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than USAS's 2.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EXK currently trades 67.0% from its 52-week high vs HL's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.37x | 2.31x | 1.71x | 1.81x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.02 | $10.50 | $15.15 | $27.77 | $34.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.36 | $1.06 | $3.14 | $5.55 | $4.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.3% | +60.8% | +67.0% | +65.2% | +52.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 56.3 | 47.6 | 49.3 | 46.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 466K | 5.8M | 9.4M | 22.2M | 15.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FURY as "Buy", USAS as "Buy", EXK as "Buy", CDE as "Buy", HL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 236.1% upside for FURY (target: $2) vs 25.6% for EXK (target: $13).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.00 | $9.75 | $12.75 | $29.00 | $23.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 4 | 14 | 21 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.0% |
CDE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). HL leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
FURY vs USAS vs EXK vs CDE vs HL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FURY or USAS or EXK or CDE or HL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) is the stronger pick with 96. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) offers the better valuation at 20. 1x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fury Gold Mines Limited (FURY) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FURY or USAS or EXK or CDE or HL?
On trailing P/E, Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) is the cheapest at 20. 1x versus Hecla Mining Company at 36. 9x. On forward P/E, Coeur Mining, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FURY or USAS or EXK or CDE or HL?
Over the past 5 years, Hecla Mining Company (HL) delivered a total return of +150.
3%, compared to -55. 6% for Fury Gold Mines Limited (FURY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HL returned +360. 6% versus FURY's -53. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FURY or USAS or EXK or CDE or HL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
26β versus Americas Gold and Silver Corporation's 2. 31β — meaning USAS is approximately 83% more volatile than HL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fury Gold Mines Limited (FURY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 45% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FURY or USAS or EXK or CDE or HL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) is pulling ahead at 96. 4% versus 5. 3% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to -519. 4% for Endeavour Silver Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CDE leads at 38. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FURY or USAS or EXK or CDE or HL?
Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 3% net margin versus -44. 9% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation — meaning it keeps 28. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HL leads at 37. 5% versus -26. 2% for USAS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HL leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FURY or USAS or EXK or CDE or HL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 26. 3x for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation — 17. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FURY: 236. 1% to $2. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FURY or USAS or EXK or CDE or HL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is FURY or USAS or EXK or CDE or HL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
26), +360. 6% 10Y return). Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS) carries a higher beta of 2. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HL: +360. 6%, USAS: -5. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FURY and USAS and EXK and CDE and HL?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FURY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; USAS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EXK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CDE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.