Software - Application
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
FUSE vs AIXI vs BBAI vs AEYE vs MSFT vs JPM vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Information Technology Services
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
Banks - Diversified
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
FUSE vs AIXI vs BBAI vs AEYE vs MSFT vs JPM vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Information Technology Services | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Banks - Diversified | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $37M | $5M | $19.87B | $84M | $3.10T | $842.21B | $342.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $83M | $127M | $41M | $318.27B | $270.79B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $262K | $-116M | $-289M | $-4M | $125.22B | $58.03B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 54.8% | 64.8% | 25.8% | 78.0% | 68.3% | 58.6% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | -89.5% | -132.8% | -68.3% | -6.8% | 46.8% | 27.7% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 24.8x | 14.0x | 24.3x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $47M | $24M | $13M | $112.18B | $751.15B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $2M | $87M | $5M | $30.24B | $469.32B | $10.27B |
FUSE vs AIXI vs BBAI vs AEYE vs MSFT vs JPM vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fusemachines Inc. (FUSE) | 100 | 12.4 | -87.6% |
| Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) | 100 | 0.7 | -99.3% |
| BigBear.ai Holdings… (BBAI) | 100 | 172.1 | +72.1% |
| AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) | 100 | 94.2 | -5.8% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 144.5 | +44.5% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 239.7 | +139.7% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 128.1 | +28.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FUSE vs AIXI vs BBAI vs AEYE vs MSFT vs JPM vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FUSE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 7 stocks, AIXI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BBAI doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
In this particular matchup, AEYE is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
MSFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.9%, EPS growth 15.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.4%
- 7.5% 10Y total return vs JPM's 435.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.86, Low D/E 32.7%, current ratio 1.35x
- Beta 0.86, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
- 14.9% revenue growth vs FUSE's -98.6%
JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 1.6%
- PEG 1.08 vs KO's 2.18
- Lower P/E (14.0x vs 24.3x), PEG 1.08 vs 2.18
- +21.5% vs FUSE's -89.1%
KO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 2.6% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.6%, (4 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.9% revenue growth vs FUSE's -98.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.0x vs 24.3x), PEG 1.08 vs 2.18 | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs BBAI's -226.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs BBAI's 3.52 | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.6%, (4 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.5% vs FUSE's -89.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.2% ROA vs AIXI's -171.0% |
FUSE vs AIXI vs BBAI vs AEYE vs MSFT vs JPM vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FUSE vs AIXI vs BBAI vs AEYE vs MSFT vs JPM vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 7 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSFT leads in 2 of 6 categories
JPM leads 2 • KO leads 2 • FUSE leads 0 • AIXI leads 0 • BBAI leads 0 • AEYE leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT is the larger business by revenue, generating $318.3B annually — 33177.6x FUSE's $10M. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BBAI's -2.3%. On growth, MSFT holds the edge at +18.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $83M | $127M | $41M | $318.3B | $270.8B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | -$109M | -$75M | $69,000 | $192.6B | $81.3B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $261,897 | -$116M | -$289M | -$4M | $125.2B | $58.0B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | -$4M | -$56M | $6M | $72.9B | -$119.7B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.8% | +64.8% | +25.8% | +78.0% | +68.3% | +58.6% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -89.5% | -132.8% | -68.3% | -6.8% | +46.8% | +27.7% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | -140.4% | -2.3% | -9.0% | +39.3% | +21.6% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -82.3% | -4.3% | -44.3% | +14.6% | +22.9% | -15.5% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.8% | -97.8% | -0.9% | +8.4% | +18.3% | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -46.7% | +52.0% | -41.7% | +23.4% | +16.0% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.8x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 48% valuation discount to MSFT's 30.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 1.22x vs KO's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $37M | $5M | $19.9B | $84M | $3.10T | $842.2B | $342.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $34M | $49M | $19.8B | $91M | $3.18T | $1.12T | $377.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -15.90x | -0.06x | -5.12x | -26.76x | 30.55x | 15.82x | 26.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 24.80x | 14.03x | 24.31x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.62x | 1.22x | 2.34x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 236.42x | 19.53x | 13.54x | 25.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.80x | 0.39x | 155.62x | 2.07x | 10.99x | 3.11x | 7.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 24.63x | 17.29x | 9.06x | 2.61x | 10.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 17.79x | 43.22x | — | 64.59x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MSFT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-71 for AEYE. BBAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AEYE's 2.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs AIXI's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — | -50.7% | -71.0% | +33.1% | +16.1% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | -171.0% | -35.3% | -11.3% | +19.2% | +1.3% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — | -19.5% | -20.1% | +24.9% | +5.4% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.5% | — | -19.6% | -17.7% | +29.7% | +8.2% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.04x | 2.75x | 0.33x | 2.18x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $44M | -$63M | $8M | $81.9B | $281.8B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $2M | $87M | $5M | $30.2B | $469.3B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $47M | $24M | $13M | $112.2B | $751.1B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.49x | -20.26x | -18.17x | -11.14x | 55.65x | 0.74x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $20,251 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $87 for AIXI. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +21.5% total return vs FUSE's -89.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.0% vs AIXI's -79.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.7% | +5.9% | -28.1% | -32.8% | -11.5% | -3.1% | +15.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -89.1% | -84.0% | +11.4% | -45.7% | -10.1% | +21.5% | +15.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.8% | -99.2% | +110.0% | +12.8% | +26.9% | +135.5% | +40.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.9% | -99.1% | -57.2% | -65.9% | +70.0% | +102.5% | +58.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.9% | -99.1% | -57.3% | +67.3% | +745.5% | +435.6% | +112.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.4% | -79.7% | +28.1% | +4.1% | +8.3% | +33.0% | +12.0% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBAI's 3.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs FUSE's 5.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.39x | 1.13x | 3.52x | 2.25x | 0.86x | 0.95x | -0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.00 | $62.00 | $9.39 | $16.39 | $555.45 | $337.25 | $82.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.80 | $0.27 | $3.01 | $5.31 | $356.28 | $260.31 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +5.1% | +14.7% | +44.7% | +40.8% | +75.0% | +92.6% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.0 | 37.9 | 58.4 | 46.8 | 52.9 | 58.4 | 37.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 13.5M | 38.3M | 148K | 33.6M | 7.1M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BBAI as "Hold", MSFT as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.9% upside for BBAI (target: $6) vs 8.5% for JPM (target: $339). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.56% vs MSFT's 0.77%.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $6.00 | — | $551.96 | $338.78 | $86.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 4 | — | 82 | 61 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.8% | +1.6% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 2 | 1 | 21 | 15 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $3.23 | $5.13 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.5% | +0.6% | +3.4% | +0.2% |
MSFT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
FUSE vs AIXI vs BBAI vs AEYE vs MSFT vs JPM vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FUSE or AIXI or BBAI or AEYE or MSFT or JPM or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger pick with 14.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -98. 6% for Fusemachines Inc. (FUSE). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (14. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) a "Buy" — based on 82 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FUSE or AIXI or BBAI or AEYE or MSFT or JPM or KO?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 15. 8x versus Microsoft Corporation at 30. 5x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 1. 08x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 18x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FUSE or AIXI or BBAI or AEYE or MSFT or JPM or KO?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +102. 5%, compared to -99. 1% for Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSFT returned +745. 5% versus AIXI's -99. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FUSE or AIXI or BBAI or AEYE or MSFT or JPM or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 52β — meaning BBAI is approximately -2482% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for AudioEye, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FUSE or AIXI or BBAI or AEYE or MSFT or JPM or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is pulling ahead at 14.
9% versus -98. 6% for Fusemachines Inc. (FUSE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fusemachines Inc. grew EPS 86. 1% year-over-year, compared to -361. 3% for Xiao-I Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MSFT leads at 12. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FUSE or AIXI or BBAI or AEYE or MSFT or JPM or KO?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus -821. 1% for Xiao-I Corporation — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -783. 6% for AIXI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEYE leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FUSE or AIXI or BBAI or AEYE or MSFT or JPM or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 08x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 18x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 0x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Microsoft Corporation — 10. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BBAI: 42. 9% to $6. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FUSE or AIXI or BBAI or AEYE or MSFT or JPM or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
6% yield), JPM (1. 6% yield), MSFT (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. FUSE, AIXI, BBAI, AEYE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FUSE or AIXI or BBAI or AEYE or MSFT or JPM or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 6% yield, +112. 9% 10Y return). BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) carries a higher beta of 3. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +112. 9%, BBAI: -57. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FUSE and AIXI and BBAI and AEYE and MSFT and JPM and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (FUSE (Technology) and AIXI (Technology) and BBAI (Technology) and AEYE (Technology) and MSFT (Technology) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FUSE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AIXI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BBAI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. MSFT, JPM, KO pay a dividend while FUSE, AIXI, BBAI, AEYE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.