Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GABC vs IBCP vs SFNC vs CZWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
GABC vs IBCP vs SFNC vs CZWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.66B | $699M | $3.09B | $203M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $487M | $315M | $627M | $90M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $113M | $69M | $-398M | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 70.2% | 69.6% | 5.8% | 54.7% |
| Operating Margin | 28.7% | 25.8% | -84.2% | 7.0% |
| Forward P/E | 11.7x | 9.6x | 10.3x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $183M | $117M | $641M | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $72M | $52M | $380M | $119M |
GABC vs IBCP vs SFNC vs CZWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| German American Ban… (GABC) | 100 | 142.3 | +42.3% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 245.7 | +145.7% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GABC vs IBCP vs SFNC vs CZWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GABC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 2.7%
- Rev growth 54.5%, EPS growth 8.1%
- NIM 3.5% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- 54.5% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 184.6% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 157.0%
- PEG 1.82 vs CZWI's 2.32
- Lower P/E (9.6x vs 11.8x), PEG 1.82 vs 2.32
SFNC is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs GABC's 2.7%
CZWI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs SFNC's 1.02
- +45.6% vs IBCP's +12.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 54.5% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 11.8x), PEG 1.82 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs SFNC's 1.02 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs GABC's 2.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.6% vs IBCP's +12.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs SFNC's 0.9% |
GABC vs IBCP vs SFNC vs CZWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GABC vs IBCP vs SFNC vs CZWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GABC leads in 2 of 6 categories
IBCP leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • SFNC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GABC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SFNC is the larger business by revenue, generating $627M annually — 7.0x CZWI's $90M. GABC is the more profitable business, keeping 23.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $487M | $315M | $627M | $90M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $167M | $89M | -$497M | $9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $113M | $69M | -$398M | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $154M | $70M | $755M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.2% | +69.6% | +5.8% | +54.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.7% | +25.8% | -84.2% | +7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +21.7% | -63.4% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +31.6% | +22.2% | +71.7% | +11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.8% | +2.3% | +42.1% | +63.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.4x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 28% valuation discount to CZWI's 14.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBCP offers better value at 1.97x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $699M | $3.1B | $203M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $764M | $3.4B | $136M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.41x | 10.38x | -7.24x | 14.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.72x | 9.56x | 10.35x | 11.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.61x | 1.97x | — | 2.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.62x | 9.39x | — | 15.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.40x | 2.22x | 4.93x | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.40x | 1.41x | 0.84x | 1.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.76x | 9.96x | 6.88x | 19.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GABC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. GABC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CZWI's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.2% | +14.2% | -11.6% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +1.3% | -1.6% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.3% | +10.2% | -9.1% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.4% | +2.6% | -4.2% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 0.23x | 0.19x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $111M | $65M | $261M | -$67M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $72M | $52M | $380M | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $183M | $117M | $641M | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.11x | 0.91x | -1.01x | 0.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $17,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,461 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +45.6% total return vs IBCP's +12.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs SFNC's 15.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.2% | +7.2% | +14.6% | +21.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +17.8% | +12.6% | +16.7% | +45.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.2% | +130.6% | +53.4% | +160.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.9% | +63.7% | -15.4% | +71.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +146.5% | +184.6% | +25.2% | +157.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.1% | +32.1% | +15.3% | +37.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GABC and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFNC's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GABC currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs IBCP's 90.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 0.83x | 1.02x | 0.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.00 | $37.39 | $22.18 | $22.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.55 | $29.63 | $17.00 | $12.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.0% | +90.8% | +96.3% | +93.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.0 | 50.6 | 62.3 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 142K | 176K | 1.2M | 40K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GABC and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GABC as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 11.9% upside for IBCP (target: $38) vs 6.1% for SFNC (target: $23). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.00% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $48.00 | $38.00 | $22.67 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 7 | 9 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +3.0% | +4.0% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 13 | 11 | 6 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.18 | $1.03 | $0.85 | $0.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.8% | 0.0% | +3.1% |
GABC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IBCP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
GABC vs IBCP vs SFNC vs CZWI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GABC or IBCP or SFNC or CZWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, German American Bancorp, Inc.
(GABC) is the stronger pick with 54. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GABC or IBCP or SFNC or CZWI?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
4x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Independent Bank Corporation wins at 1. 82x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GABC or IBCP or SFNC or CZWI?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +71. 2%, compared to -15. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +184. 6% versus SFNC's +25. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GABC or IBCP or SFNC or CZWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Simmons First National Corporation's 1. 02β — meaning SFNC is approximately 123% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, German American Bancorp, Inc. (GABC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 28% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GABC or IBCP or SFNC or CZWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), German American Bancorp, Inc.
(GABC) is pulling ahead at 54. 5% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 9. 0% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GABC or IBCP or SFNC or CZWI?
German American Bancorp, Inc.
(GABC) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 1% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 23. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GABC leads at 28. 7% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GABC leads at 70. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GABC or IBCP or SFNC or CZWI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 82x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 2. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IBCP: 11. 9% to $38. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GABC or IBCP or SFNC or CZWI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is GABC or IBCP or SFNC or CZWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, SFNC: +25. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GABC and IBCP and SFNC and CZWI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GABC is a small-cap high-growth stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.