Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GAMB vs GENI vs SRAD vs DKNG vs FLUT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GAMB
Gambling.com Group Limited

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • JE
Market Cap$159M
5Y Perf.-50.6%
GENI
Genius Sports Limited

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNYSE • GB
Market Cap$1.08B
5Y Perf.-76.4%
SRAD
Sportradar Group AG

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • CH
Market Cap$3.86B
5Y Perf.-42.4%
DKNG
DraftKings Inc.

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$12.65B
5Y Perf.-47.0%
FLUT
Flutter Entertainment plc

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • IE
Market Cap$17.60B
5Y Perf.-48.9%

GAMB vs GENI vs SRAD vs DKNG vs FLUT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GAMB logoGAMB
GENI logoGENI
SRAD logoSRAD
DKNG logoDKNG
FLUT logoFLUT
IndustryGambling, Resorts & CasinosInternet Content & InformationSoftware - ApplicationGambling, Resorts & CasinosGambling, Resorts & Casinos
Market Cap$159M$1.08B$3.86B$12.65B$17.60B
Revenue (TTM)$155M$713M$1.33B$6.29B$17.02B
Net Income (TTM)$2M$-159M$70M$59M$-457M
Gross Margin93.2%22.6%38.2%41.8%44.2%
Operating Margin2.6%-18.3%9.3%0.6%4.4%
Forward P/E8.8x161.2x32.4x104.4x16.8x
Total Debt$28M$30M$63M$1.93B$13.35B
Cash & Equiv.$14M$281M$365M$1.60B$3.83B

GAMB vs GENI vs SRAD vs DKNG vs FLUTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GAMB
GENI
SRAD
DKNG
FLUT
StockSep 21May 26Return
Gambling.com Group … (GAMB)10049.4-50.6%
Genius Sports Limit… (GENI)10023.6-76.4%
Sportradar Group AG (SRAD)10057.6-42.4%
DraftKings Inc. (DKNG)10053.0-47.0%
Flutter Entertainme… (FLUT)10051.1-48.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GAMB vs GENI vs SRAD vs DKNG vs FLUT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SRAD leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Gambling.com Group Limited is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. GENI and DKNG also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
GAMB
Gambling.com Group Limited
The Value Play

GAMB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (8.8x vs 16.8x)
Best for: value
GENI
Genius Sports Limited
The Income Pick

GENI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.39
  • 31.0% revenue growth vs SRAD's 12.0%
Best for: income & stability
SRAD
Sportradar Group AG
The Defensive Pick

SRAD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.63, Low D/E 6.4%, current ratio 1.17x
  • Beta 0.63, current ratio 1.17x
  • 5.2% margin vs GENI's -22.3%
  • Beta 0.63 vs GENI's 1.39
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
DKNG
DraftKings Inc.
The Growth Play

DKNG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
  • 160.4% 10Y total return vs GAMB's -43.6%
  • -27.8% vs GAMB's -66.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
FLUT
Flutter Entertainment plc
The Consumer Cyclical Pick

Among these 5 stocks, FLUT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGENI logoGENI31.0% revenue growth vs SRAD's 12.0%
ValueGAMB logoGAMBLower P/E (8.8x vs 16.8x)
Quality / MarginsSRAD logoSRAD5.2% margin vs GENI's -22.3%
Stability / SafetySRAD logoSRADBeta 0.63 vs GENI's 1.39
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)DKNG logoDKNG-27.8% vs GAMB's -66.6%
Efficiency (ROA)SRAD logoSRAD2.7% ROA vs GENI's -15.4%, ROIC 12.9% vs -16.6%

GAMB vs GENI vs SRAD vs DKNG vs FLUT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GAMBGambling.com Group Limited
FY 2024
Casino Revenue
72.5%$92M
Sports
26.2%$33M
Other Product Type Revenue
1.3%$2M
GENIGenius Sports Limited
FY 2025
Betting Technology Content And Services
70.4%$472M
Media Technology Content And Services
21.6%$144M
Sports Technology And Services
8.0%$53M
SRADSportradar Group AG
FY 2023
Betting data / Betting entertainment tools
46.6%$278M
Managed Betting Services ("MBS")
29.5%$176M
Other revenue
9.3%$55M
Betting revenue
8.5%$51M
Sports Solutions
6.2%$37M
DKNGDraftKings Inc.
FY 2025
Product and Service, Other
100.0%$423M
FLUTFlutter Entertainment plc
FY 2025
International Segment
57.5%$9.4B
United States Segment
42.5%$7.0B

GAMB vs GENI vs SRAD vs DKNG vs FLUT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLGAMBLAGGINGFLUT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SRAD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

FLUT is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.0B annually — 110.2x GAMB's $155M. SRAD is the more profitable business, keeping 5.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GENI's -22.3%. On growth, GENI holds the edge at +30.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGAMB logoGAMBGambling.com Grou…GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…SRAD logoSRADSportradar Group …DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.FLUT logoFLUTFlutter Entertain…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$155M$713M$1.3B$6.3B$17.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$20M-$54M$308M$242M$2.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2M-$159M$70M$59M-$457M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$39M$16M$363M$679M$728M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+93.2%+22.6%+38.2%+41.8%+44.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+2.6%-18.3%+9.3%+0.6%+4.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.2%-22.3%+5.2%+0.9%-2.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+25.3%+2.2%+27.3%+10.8%+4.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+21.4%+30.5%+13.2%+16.8%+17.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-145.8%-6.0%-128.5%+143.7%-22.3%
SRAD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

GAMB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 5.4x trailing earnings, GAMB trades at a 86% valuation discount to SRAD's 37.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GAMB's 4.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DKNG's 50.0x.

MetricGAMB logoGAMBGambling.com Grou…GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…SRAD logoSRADSportradar Group …DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.FLUT logoFLUTFlutter Entertain…
Market CapShares × price$159M$1.1B$3.9B$12.7B$17.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$173M$834M$3.5B$13.0B$27.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS5.37x-10.00x37.04x-3150.62x-58.49x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.81x161.17x32.39x104.42x16.79x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.65x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple4.17x16.91x49.99x10.67x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.25x1.62x2.65x2.09x1.07x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.33x1.55x3.63x20.04x1.87x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF41.60x16.79x8.60x19.54x16.32x
GAMB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

GAMB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

DKNG delivers a 7.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-22 for GENI. GENI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DKNG's 3.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GAMB scores 7/9 vs GENI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricGAMB logoGAMBGambling.com Grou…GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…SRAD logoSRADSportradar Group …DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.FLUT logoFLUTFlutter Entertain…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+1.4%-22.2%+7.3%+7.9%-4.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.7%-15.4%+2.7%+1.3%-1.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+23.0%-16.6%+12.9%-0.9%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+26.3%-15.3%+5.3%-0.6%+4.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–973474
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.23x0.04x0.06x3.06x1.38x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$14M-$250M-$302M$330M$9.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$14M$281M$365M$1.6B$3.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$28M$30M$63M$1.9B$13.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.79x-75.96x2.02x4.25x0.63x
GAMB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — GAMB and GENI and DKNG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GAMB five years ago would be worth $5,638 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,354 for GENI. Over the past 12 months, DKNG leads with a -27.8% total return vs GAMB's -66.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GENI at 2.7% vs GAMB's -23.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGAMB logoGAMBGambling.com Grou…GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…SRAD logoSRADSportradar Group …DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.FLUT logoFLUTFlutter Entertain…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-14.7%-59.2%-44.1%-28.4%-53.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-66.6%-56.9%-42.2%-27.8%-58.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-54.7%+8.4%+1.1%+5.5%-49.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-43.6%-76.5%-47.9%-43.7%-50.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-43.6%-56.0%-47.9%+160.4%-22.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-23.2%+2.7%+0.4%+1.8%-20.1%
Evenly matched — GAMB and GENI and DKNG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SRAD and DKNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SRAD is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GENI's 1.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DKNG currently trades 52.3% from its 52-week high vs GAMB's 30.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGAMB logoGAMBGambling.com Grou…GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…SRAD logoSRADSportradar Group …DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.FLUT logoFLUTFlutter Entertain…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.38x1.39x0.63x1.06x1.17x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$14.95$13.73$32.22$48.78$313.69
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.51$3.83$11.66$20.46$97.94
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+30.2%+32.0%+40.5%+52.3%+32.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10069.954.841.063.339.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded565K5.6M3.6M13.3M3.3M
Evenly matched — SRAD and DKNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: GAMB as "Buy", GENI as "Buy", SRAD as "Buy", DKNG as "Buy", FLUT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 153.9% upside for GENI (target: $11) vs 43.6% for DKNG (target: $37).

MetricGAMB logoGAMBGambling.com Grou…GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…SRAD logoSRADSportradar Group …DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.FLUT logoFLUTFlutter Entertain…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$7.00$11.17$20.85$36.64$206.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts819204824
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises11
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+17.1%0.0%+3.1%+6.6%+6.4%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

GAMB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SRAD leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallGambling.com Group Limited (GAMB)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GAMB vs GENI vs SRAD vs DKNG vs FLUT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GAMB or GENI or SRAD or DKNG or FLUT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is the stronger pick with 31.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 0% for Sportradar Group AG (SRAD). Gambling. com Group Limited (GAMB) offers the better valuation at 5. 4x trailing P/E (8. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gambling. com Group Limited (GAMB) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GAMB or GENI or SRAD or DKNG or FLUT?

On trailing P/E, Gambling.

com Group Limited (GAMB) is the cheapest at 5. 4x versus Sportradar Group AG at 37. 0x. On forward P/E, Gambling. com Group Limited is actually cheaper at 8. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GAMB or GENI or SRAD or DKNG or FLUT?

Over the past 5 years, Gambling.

com Group Limited (GAMB) delivered a total return of -43. 6%, compared to -76. 5% for Genius Sports Limited (GENI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DKNG returned +160. 4% versus GENI's -56. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GAMB or GENI or SRAD or DKNG or FLUT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

63β versus Genius Sports Limited's 1. 39β — meaning GENI is approximately 120% more volatile than SRAD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for DraftKings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GAMB or GENI or SRAD or DKNG or FLUT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is pulling ahead at 31.

0% versus 12. 0% for Sportradar Group AG (SRAD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sportradar Group AG grew EPS 200. 0% year-over-year, compared to -820. 8% for Flutter Entertainment plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, GAMB leads at 44. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GAMB or GENI or SRAD or DKNG or FLUT?

Gambling.

com Group Limited (GAMB) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 1% net margin versus -16. 7% for Genius Sports Limited — meaning it keeps 24. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GAMB leads at 28. 1% versus -15. 6% for GENI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GAMB leads at 94. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GAMB or GENI or SRAD or DKNG or FLUT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Gambling.

com Group Limited (GAMB) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 161. 2x for Genius Sports Limited — 152. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GENI: 153. 9% to $11. 17.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GAMB or GENI or SRAD or DKNG or FLUT?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is GAMB or GENI or SRAD or DKNG or FLUT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

63)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SRAD: -47. 9%, GENI: -56. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GAMB and GENI and SRAD and DKNG and FLUT?

These companies operate in different sectors (GAMB (Consumer Cyclical) and GENI (Communication Services) and SRAD (Technology) and DKNG (Consumer Cyclical) and FLUT (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: GAMB is a small-cap high-growth stock; GENI is a small-cap high-growth stock; SRAD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FLUT is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

GAMB

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Gross Margin > 55%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GENI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 15%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SRAD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DKNG

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Gross Margin > 25%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FLUT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Gross Margin > 26%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GAMB and GENI and SRAD and DKNG and FLUT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GAMB: 21.4% · GENI: 30.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.