Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GAMB vs RILY vs HLI vs MC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Conglomerates
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Capital Markets
GAMB vs RILY vs HLI vs MC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Financial - Conglomerates | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $155M | $305M | $10.71B | $4.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $155M | $1.03B | $2.39B | $1.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $531M | $448M | $233M |
| Gross Margin | 93.2% | 65.0% | 38.5% | 99.2% |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | 14.6% | 21.0% | 18.1% |
| Forward P/E | 8.6x | 1.1x | 19.9x | 20.8x |
| Total Debt | $28M | $1.47B | $438M | $267M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $227M | $971M | $509M |
GAMB vs RILY vs HLI vs MC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gambling.com Group … (GAMB) | 100 | 63.1 | -36.9% |
| BRC Group Holdings,… (RILY) | 100 | 12.9 | -87.1% |
| Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI) | 100 | 172.2 | +72.2% |
| Moelis & Company (MC) | 100 | 107.9 | +7.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GAMB vs RILY vs HLI vs MC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GAMB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
RILY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (1.1x vs 8.6x)
- 29.8% margin vs GAMB's 1.2%
- +210.4% vs GAMB's -66.9%
- 31.3% ROA vs GAMB's 0.7%, ROIC 8.3% vs 23.0%
HLI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.6%
- 6.0% 10Y total return vs MC's 262.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, Low D/E 20.1%, current ratio 1.38x
- Beta 0.94 vs RILY's 2.03
MC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 65.2%
- Beta 1.75, yield 4.1%, current ratio 21.47x
- 27.0% NII/revenue growth vs RILY's -11.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.0% NII/revenue growth vs RILY's -11.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.1x vs 8.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.8% margin vs GAMB's 1.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs RILY's 2.03 | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs MC's 4.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +210.4% vs GAMB's -66.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 31.3% ROA vs GAMB's 0.7%, ROIC 8.3% vs 23.0% |
GAMB vs RILY vs HLI vs MC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GAMB vs RILY vs HLI vs MC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GAMB leads in 1 of 6 categories
RILY leads 0 • HLI leads 0 • MC leads 0 • 5 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — RILY and MC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HLI is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.4B annually — 15.5x GAMB's $155M. RILY is the more profitable business, keeping 29.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GAMB's 1.2%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $155M | $1.0B | $2.4B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $20M | $390M | $591M | $286M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $531M | $448M | $233M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $39M | $180M | $739M | $540M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +93.2% | +65.0% | +38.5% | +99.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +14.6% | +21.0% | +18.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | +29.8% | +16.7% | +15.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.3% | -6.9% | +33.9% | +35.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.4% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -145.8% | +100.0% | +22.3% | -4.3% |
Valuation Metrics
GAMB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.1x trailing earnings, RILY trades at a 96% valuation discount to HLI's 26.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GAMB's 4.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HLI's 18.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $155M | $305M | $10.7B | $4.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $170M | $1.5B | $10.2B | $4.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.26x | 1.14x | 26.37x | 21.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.63x | — | 19.92x | 20.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.67x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.09x | 8.33x | 18.75x | 15.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.22x | 0.30x | 4.48x | 3.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.30x | — | 4.84x | 7.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 40.77x | — | 13.24x | 8.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — GAMB and HLI each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MC delivers a 37.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $38 in annual profit, vs $1 for GAMB. HLI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MC's 0.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GAMB scores 7/9 vs RILY's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.4% | — | +20.1% | +37.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +31.3% | +11.9% | +15.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +23.0% | +8.3% | +15.5% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +26.3% | +10.2% | +20.1% | +22.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | — | 0.20x | 0.39x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $14M | $1.2B | -$533M | -$241M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $227M | $971M | $509M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $28M | $1.5B | $438M | $267M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.79x | 10.78x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — RILY and HLI and MC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HLI five years ago would be worth $24,153 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,544 for RILY. Over the past 12 months, RILY leads with a +210.4% total return vs GAMB's -66.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MC at 26.8% vs RILY's -29.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.4% | +67.8% | -12.6% | -9.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -66.9% | +210.4% | -5.1% | +24.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.6% | -65.6% | +85.7% | +104.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.8% | -64.6% | +141.5% | +50.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.7% | +239.7% | +603.4% | +262.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -23.7% | -29.9% | +22.9% | +26.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HLI and MC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HLI is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RILY's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MC currently trades 81.7% from its 52-week high vs GAMB's 29.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.38x | 2.03x | 0.94x | 1.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.95 | $10.97 | $211.78 | $78.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.51 | $2.75 | $134.41 | $51.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +29.6% | +79.2% | +72.5% | +81.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.4 | 65.8 | 36.6 | 49.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 559K | 820K | 606K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HLI and MC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GAMB as "Buy", RILY as "Hold", HLI as "Buy", MC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 58.4% upside for GAMB (target: $7) vs 14.8% for MC (target: $73). For income investors, MC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.12% vs HLI's 1.57%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | — | $200.00 | $73.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 1 | 15 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.6% | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 7 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.41 | $2.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +17.4% | 0.0% | +0.5% | +1.6% |
GAMB leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics. 5 categories are tied.
GAMB vs RILY vs HLI vs MC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GAMB or RILY or HLI or MC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Moelis & Company (MC) is the stronger pick with 27.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 5% for BRC Group Holdings, Inc. (RILY). BRC Group Holdings, Inc. (RILY) offers the better valuation at 1. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gambling. com Group Limited (GAMB) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GAMB or RILY or HLI or MC?
On trailing P/E, BRC Group Holdings, Inc.
(RILY) is the cheapest at 1. 1x versus Houlihan Lokey, Inc. at 26. 4x. On forward P/E, Gambling. com Group Limited is actually cheaper at 8. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GAMB or RILY or HLI or MC?
Over the past 5 years, Houlihan Lokey, Inc.
(HLI) delivered a total return of +141. 5%, compared to -64. 6% for BRC Group Holdings, Inc. (RILY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HLI returned +603. 4% versus GAMB's -44. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GAMB or RILY or HLI or MC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Houlihan Lokey, Inc.
(HLI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus BRC Group Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 03β — meaning RILY is approximately 116% more volatile than HLI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 39% for Moelis & Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GAMB or RILY or HLI or MC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Moelis & Company (MC) is pulling ahead at 27.
0% versus -11. 5% for BRC Group Holdings, Inc. (RILY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BRC Group Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 129. 9% year-over-year, compared to 41. 6% for Houlihan Lokey, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GAMB or RILY or HLI or MC?
BRC Group Holdings, Inc.
(RILY) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 8% net margin versus 15. 4% for Moelis & Company — meaning it keeps 29. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GAMB leads at 28. 1% versus 14. 6% for RILY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MC leads at 99. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GAMB or RILY or HLI or MC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Gambling.
com Group Limited (GAMB) trades at 8. 6x forward P/E versus 20. 8x for Moelis & Company — 12. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GAMB: 58. 4% to $7. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GAMB or RILY or HLI or MC?
In this comparison, MC (4.
1% yield), HLI (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. GAMB, RILY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GAMB or RILY or HLI or MC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Houlihan Lokey, Inc.
(HLI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 6% yield, +603. 4% 10Y return). BRC Group Holdings, Inc. (RILY) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HLI: +603. 4%, RILY: +239. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GAMB and RILY and HLI and MC?
These companies operate in different sectors (GAMB (Consumer Cyclical) and RILY (Financial Services) and HLI (Financial Services) and MC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GAMB is a small-cap high-growth stock; RILY is a small-cap deep-value stock; HLI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MC is a small-cap high-growth stock. HLI, MC pay a dividend while GAMB, RILY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.