Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GBIO vs RARE vs ARWR vs RCKT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
GBIO vs RARE vs ARWR vs RCKT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $36M | $2.57B | $10.92B | $398M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15M | $669M | $622M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-63M | $-609M | $-301M | $-223M |
| Gross Margin | 90.8% | 83.6% | 85.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -5.5% | -83.9% | -35.7% | — |
| Total Debt | $94M | $1.28B | $366M | $25M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $76M | $434M | $227M | $78M |
GBIO vs RARE vs ARWR vs RCKT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generation Bio Co. (GBIO) | 100 | 2.5 | -97.5% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 30.8 | -69.2% |
| Arrowhead Pharmaceu… (ARWR) | 100 | 160.5 | +60.5% |
| Rocket Pharmaceutic… (RCKT) | 100 | 16.6 | -83.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GBIO vs RARE vs ARWR vs RCKT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GBIO plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
RARE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ARWR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 232.6%, EPS growth 99.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 50.5%
- 12.5% 10Y total return vs RARE's -59.4%
- 232.6% revenue growth vs RCKT's 10.5%
- -48.4% margin vs GBIO's -410.1%
RCKT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 1.31
- Lower volatility, beta 1.31, Low D/E 9.0%, current ratio 6.38x
- Beta 1.31, current ratio 6.38x
- Beta 1.31 vs ARWR's 1.81, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 232.6% revenue growth vs RCKT's 10.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | -48.4% margin vs GBIO's -410.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.31 vs ARWR's 1.81, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +496.9% vs RCKT's -45.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -18.1% ROA vs RCKT's -67.5%, ROIC 9.3% vs -63.2% |
GBIO vs RARE vs ARWR vs RCKT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
GBIO vs RARE vs ARWR vs RCKT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ARWR leads in 3 of 6 categories
GBIO leads 1 • RARE leads 0 • RCKT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARWR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RARE and RCKT operate at a comparable scale, with $669M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -48.4% (ARWR) to -4.1% (GBIO). On growth, RARE holds the edge at -2.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15M | $669M | $622M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$80M | -$536M | -$203M | -$232M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$63M | -$609M | -$301M | -$223M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$115M | -$487M | -$51M | -$190M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.8% | +83.6% | +85.1% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.5% | -83.9% | -35.7% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | -91.0% | -48.4% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.5% | -72.8% | -8.2% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -78.9% | -2.4% | -86.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +64.2% | -17.2% | -133.8% | +38.7% |
Valuation Metrics
GBIO leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $36M | $2.6B | $10.9B | $398M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $53M | $3.4B | $11.1B | $345M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.27x | -4.48x | -6389.34x | -1.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 90.41x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.81x | 3.82x | 13.16x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.41x | — | 20.71x | 1.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 69.58x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARWR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ARWR delivers a -55.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-55 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. RCKT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GBIO's 1.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARWR scores 6/9 vs RCKT's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -94.8% | -6.1% | -55.5% | -80.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -34.1% | -45.8% | -18.1% | -67.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -63.2% | -89.4% | +9.3% | -63.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -53.6% | -46.4% | +8.8% | -58.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.09x | — | 0.73x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $17M | $842M | $140M | -$53M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $76M | $434M | $227M | $78M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $94M | $1.3B | $366M | $25M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -14.49x | -1.03x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARWR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARWR five years ago would be worth $11,743 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $165 for GBIO. Over the past 12 months, ARWR leads with a +496.9% total return vs RCKT's -45.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARWR at 24.4% vs GBIO's -51.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.9% | +10.7% | +15.0% | +6.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.9% | -21.8% | +496.9% | -45.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.6% | -44.5% | +92.7% | -82.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.3% | -77.2% | +17.4% | -91.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -59.4% | +1253.3% | -91.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -51.5% | -17.8% | +24.4% | -44.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ARWR and RCKT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RCKT is the less volatile stock with a 1.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARWR's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARWR currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs RCKT's 49.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.66x | 1.36x | 1.74x | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.95 | $42.37 | $79.48 | $7.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.00 | $18.29 | $12.44 | $2.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.8% | +61.7% | +98.1% | +49.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.2 | 66.6 | 69.7 | 54.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 1.8M | 1.9M | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RARE as "Buy", ARWR as "Buy", RCKT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 85.1% upside for RARE (target: $48) vs 5.6% for ARWR (target: $82).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $48.36 | $82.33 | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 33 | 20 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ARWR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GBIO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
GBIO vs RARE vs ARWR vs RCKT: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GBIO or RARE or ARWR or RCKT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARWR) is the stronger pick with 232. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 20. 1% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Analysts rate Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GBIO or RARE or ARWR or RCKT?
Over the past 5 years, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARWR) delivered a total return of +17. 4%, compared to -98. 3% for Generation Bio Co. (GBIO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARWR returned +1162% versus GBIO's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GBIO or RARE or ARWR or RCKT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RCKT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 21β versus Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 1. 74β — meaning ARWR is approximately 43% more volatile than RCKT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RCKT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 109% for Generation Bio Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — GBIO or RARE or ARWR or RCKT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARWR) is pulling ahead at 232. 6% versus 20. 1% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 99. 8% year-over-year, compared to -0. 7% for Generation Bio Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARWR leads at 50. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GBIO or RARE or ARWR or RCKT?
Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RCKT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -661. 9% for Generation Bio Co. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARWR leads at 11. 9% versus -715. 8% for GBIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GBIO leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — GBIO or RARE or ARWR or RCKT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is GBIO or RARE or ARWR or RCKT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARWR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1162% 10Y return). Generation Bio Co. (GBIO) carries a higher beta of 1. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARWR: +1162%, GBIO: -97. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GBIO and RARE and ARWR and RCKT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GBIO is a small-cap high-growth stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RCKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.