Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GBTG vs MMYT vs BKNG vs SABR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Services
Travel Services
Travel Services
GBTG vs MMYT vs BKNG vs SABR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Travel Services | Travel Services | Travel Services |
| Market Cap | $4.94B | $4.52B | $132.72B | $818M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.94B | $1.04B | $27.69B | $2.83B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $86M | $57M | $6.15B | $489M |
| Gross Margin | 59.0% | 73.4% | 100.0% | 50.2% |
| Operating Margin | 4.4% | 14.1% | 34.3% | 13.1% |
| Forward P/E | 57.8x | 73.2x | 16.3x | 1.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.51B | $237M | $19.29B | $4.45B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $434M | $509M | $17.20B | $792M |
GBTG vs MMYT vs BKNG vs SABR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Business Tra… (GBTG) | 100 | 95.2 | -4.8% |
| MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) | 100 | 203.6 | +103.6% |
| Booking Holdings In… (BKNG) | 100 | 211.1 | +111.1% |
| Sabre Corporation (SABR) | 100 | 18.4 | -81.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GBTG vs MMYT vs BKNG vs SABR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GBTG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +58.4% vs MMYT's -54.9%
MMYT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 25.0%, EPS growth -54.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 47.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.17, Low D/E 19.6%, current ratio 1.85x
- 25.0% revenue growth vs SABR's -8.5%
BKNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 0.9%
- 250.7% 10Y total return vs MMYT's 190.1%
- Beta 0.74, yield 0.9%, current ratio 1.33x
- 22.2% margin vs GBTG's 2.9%
SABR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (1.5x vs 73.2x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.0% revenue growth vs SABR's -8.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.5x vs 73.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.2% margin vs GBTG's 2.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs SABR's 1.99 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +58.4% vs MMYT's -54.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.1% ROA vs GBTG's 1.8% |
GBTG vs MMYT vs BKNG vs SABR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GBTG vs MMYT vs BKNG vs SABR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BKNG leads in 2 of 6 categories
MMYT leads 2 • SABR leads 1 • GBTG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKNG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKNG is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.7B annually — 26.6x MMYT's $1.0B. BKNG is the more profitable business, keeping 22.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GBTG's 2.9%. On growth, GBTG holds the edge at +35.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.9B | $1.0B | $27.7B | $2.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $341M | $175M | $10.2B | $446M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $86M | $57M | $6.2B | $489M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $26M | $224M | $9.0B | -$133M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.0% | +73.4% | +100.0% | +50.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.4% | +14.1% | +34.3% | +13.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +5.5% | +22.2% | +17.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +21.5% | +32.6% | -4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.3% | +10.6% | +16.2% | -2.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -37.5% | -68.3% | +2.4% | -77.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SABR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.5x trailing earnings, SABR trades at a 97% valuation discount to MMYT's 60.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SABR's 9.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MMYT's 28.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.9B | $4.5B | $132.7B | $818M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.0B | $4.3B | $134.8B | $4.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 44.95x | 60.86x | 25.87x | 1.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 57.84x | 73.17x | 16.32x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.16x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.08x | 28.92x | 13.41x | 9.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.82x | 4.62x | 4.93x | 0.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.98x | 4.79x | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 47.50x | 26.07x | 14.61x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MMYT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MMYT delivers a 8.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $6 for GBTG. MMYT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GBTG's 0.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MMYT scores 6/9 vs SABR's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.7% | +8.2% | — | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.8% | +3.1% | +21.1% | +11.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.8% | +9.2% | — | +9.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.7% | +9.2% | +75.4% | +10.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.91x | 0.20x | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | -$272M | $2.1B | $3.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $434M | $509M | $17.2B | $792M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $237M | $19.3B | $4.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.74x | 1.67x | 7.21x | 0.89x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MMYT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MMYT five years ago would be worth $19,700 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,849 for SABR. Over the past 12 months, GBTG leads with a +58.4% total return vs MMYT's -54.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MMYT at 25.5% vs SABR's -0.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.5% | -38.3% | -19.4% | +55.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +58.4% | -54.9% | -16.8% | -15.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.4% | +97.5% | +65.4% | -0.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.8% | +97.0% | +87.6% | -71.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.2% | +190.1% | +250.7% | -79.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.7% | +25.5% | +18.3% | -0.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GBTG and BKNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BKNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SABR's 1.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GBTG currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs BKNG's 3.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.44x | 1.17x | 0.74x | 1.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.54 | $113.85 | $5129.83 | $3.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.96 | $32.84 | $150.62 | $0.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.0% | +44.4% | +3.3% | +58.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 86.6 | 59.4 | 42.4 | 56.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.5M | 1.5M | 8.7M | 8.2M |
Analyst Outlook
BKNG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GBTG as "Buy", MMYT as "Buy", BKNG as "Buy", SABR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 80.2% upside for MMYT (target: $91) vs -4.1% for GBTG (target: $9). BKNG is the only dividend payer here at 0.89% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.05 | $91.00 | $231.72 | $2.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 11 | 71 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.53 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | +0.5% | +4.9% | 0.0% |
BKNG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). MMYT leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
GBTG vs MMYT vs BKNG vs SABR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GBTG or MMYT or BKNG or SABR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is the stronger pick with 25.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 5% for Sabre Corporation (SABR). Sabre Corporation (SABR) offers the better valuation at 1. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Global Business Travel Group, Inc. (GBTG) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GBTG or MMYT or BKNG or SABR?
On trailing P/E, Sabre Corporation (SABR) is the cheapest at 1.
5x versus MakeMyTrip Limited at 60. 9x. On forward P/E, Booking Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GBTG or MMYT or BKNG or SABR?
Over the past 5 years, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) delivered a total return of +97.
0%, compared to -71. 5% for Sabre Corporation (SABR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BKNG returned +250. 7% versus SABR's -79. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GBTG or MMYT or BKNG or SABR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Sabre Corporation's 1. 99β — meaning SABR is approximately 167% more volatile than BKNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 91% for Global Business Travel Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GBTG or MMYT or BKNG or SABR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is pulling ahead at 25.
0% versus -8. 5% for Sabre Corporation (SABR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sabre Corporation grew EPS 283. 6% year-over-year, compared to -54. 6% for MakeMyTrip Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, MMYT leads at 47. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GBTG or MMYT or BKNG or SABR?
Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 1% net margin versus 4. 0% for Global Business Travel Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKNG leads at 34. 5% versus 6. 7% for GBTG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BKNG leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GBTG or MMYT or BKNG or SABR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) trades at 16. 3x forward P/E versus 73. 2x for MakeMyTrip Limited — 56. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MMYT: 80. 2% to $91. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GBTG or MMYT or BKNG or SABR?
In this comparison, BKNG (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. GBTG, MMYT, SABR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GBTG or MMYT or BKNG or SABR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 0. 9% yield, +250. 7% 10Y return). Sabre Corporation (SABR) carries a higher beta of 1. 99 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BKNG: +250. 7%, SABR: -79. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GBTG and MMYT and BKNG and SABR?
These companies operate in different sectors (GBTG (Technology) and MMYT (Consumer Cyclical) and BKNG (Consumer Cyclical) and SABR (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GBTG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MMYT is a small-cap high-growth stock; BKNG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SABR is a small-cap deep-value stock. BKNG pays a dividend while GBTG, MMYT, SABR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.