Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GCBC vs FISI vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
GCBC vs FISI vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $408M | $697M | $2.35B | $203M | $858M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $133M | $378M | $867M | $90M | $278M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $37M | $75M | $169M | $14M | $61M |
| Gross Margin | 55.7% | 61.7% | 72.1% | 54.7% | 67.1% |
| Operating Margin | 26.1% | 24.2% | 25.3% | 7.0% | 29.2% |
| Forward P/E | 13.1x | 8.9x | 10.8x | 11.8x | 16.9x |
| Total Debt | $128M | $334M | $327M | $52M | $193M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $185M | $109M | $185M | $119M | $51M |
GCBC vs FISI vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Greene County Banco… (GCBC) | 100 | 217.7 | +117.7% |
| Financial Instituti… (FISI) | 100 | 200.2 | +100.2% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
| TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) | 100 | 153.7 | +53.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GCBC vs FISI vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GCBC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 198.9% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 157.0%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5%
FISI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 43.1%, EPS growth 231.3%
- PEG 0.94 vs TRST's 4.66
- NIM 3.2% vs GCBC's 2.0%
- 43.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
CZWI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs FISI's 1.01, lower leverage
TRST is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +60.3% vs NBTB's +9.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 16.9x), PEG 0.94 vs 4.66 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs FISI's 1.01, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.3% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% |
GCBC vs FISI vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GCBC vs FISI vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories
FISI leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • GCBC leads 0 • TRST leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 9.6x CZWI's $90M. GCBC is the more profitable business, keeping 23.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZWI's 16.0%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $133M | $378M | $867M | $90M | $278M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $42M | $97M | $241M | $9M | $90M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $37M | $75M | $169M | $14M | $61M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $33M | $16M | $225M | $11M | $46M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.7% | +61.7% | +72.1% | +54.7% | +67.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +24.2% | +25.3% | +7.0% | +29.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.4% | +19.8% | +19.5% | +16.0% | +22.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.5% | +3.6% | +25.2% | +11.5% | +16.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.4% | +118.9% | +39.5% | +63.0% | +44.1% |
Valuation Metrics
FISI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, FISI trades at a 34% valuation discount to TRST's 14.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FISI offers better value at 1.04x vs TRST's 4.11x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $408M | $697M | $2.4B | $203M | $858M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $352M | $923M | $2.5B | $136M | $1000M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.11x | 9.81x | 13.53x | 14.44x | 14.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.87x | 10.80x | 11.78x | 16.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.22x | 1.04x | 1.92x | 2.85x | 4.11x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.85x | 10.10x | 10.35x | 15.28x | 11.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.07x | 1.84x | 2.71x | 2.25x | 3.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.71x | 1.14x | 1.21x | 1.09x | 1.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.97x | 51.25x | 10.75x | 19.55x | 18.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GCBC delivers a 15.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GCBC's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GCBC scores 7/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.0% | +12.3% | +9.5% | +7.8% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +1.2% | +1.1% | +0.8% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.7% | +7.7% | +7.9% | +2.0% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.7% | +2.6% | +2.4% | +0.6% | +2.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 0.53x | 0.17x | 0.28x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$56M | $225M | $142M | -$67M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $185M | $109M | $185M | $119M | $51M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $128M | $334M | $327M | $52M | $193M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.74x | 0.69x | 1.05x | 0.16x | 0.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GCBC five years ago would be worth $19,760 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,681 for FISI. Over the past 12 months, TRST leads with a +60.3% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs GCBC's 11.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.7% | +15.9% | +9.3% | +21.5% | +18.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.9% | +42.4% | +9.0% | +45.6% | +60.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.1% | +146.3% | +54.1% | +160.0% | +88.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.6% | +26.8% | +29.9% | +71.2% | +46.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +198.9% | +67.9% | +102.2% | +157.0% | +97.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.1% | +35.1% | +15.5% | +37.5% | +23.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FISI and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FISI's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FISI currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs GCBC's 92.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 1.01x | 0.89x | 0.46x | 0.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.04 | $35.66 | $46.92 | $22.62 | $49.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.16 | $24.41 | $39.20 | $12.83 | $30.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.1% | +99.3% | +96.1% | +93.2% | +98.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.9 | 62.8 | 57.3 | 63.7 | 64.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12K | 112K | 236K | 40K | 112K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FISI and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FISI as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", TRST as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2.1% upside for NBTB (target: $46) vs 1.7% for FISI (target: $36). For income investors, FISI offers the higher dividend yield at 3.44% vs GCBC's 1.10%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $36.00 | $46.00 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | 10 | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +3.4% | +3.2% | +1.8% | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.26 | $1.22 | $1.43 | $0.37 | $1.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.6% | +0.4% | +3.1% | +4.4% |
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FISI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
GCBC vs FISI vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GCBC or FISI or NBTB or CZWI or TRST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Financial Institutions, Inc.
(FISI) is the stronger pick with 43. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Financial Institutions, Inc. (FISI) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GCBC or FISI or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
On trailing P/E, Financial Institutions, Inc.
(FISI) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY at 14. 9x. On forward P/E, Financial Institutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Financial Institutions, Inc. wins at 0. 94x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 66x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GCBC or FISI or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
Over the past 5 years, Greene County Bancorp, Inc.
(GCBC) delivered a total return of +97. 6%, compared to +26. 8% for Financial Institutions, Inc. (FISI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GCBC returned +198. 9% versus FISI's +67. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GCBC or FISI or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Financial Institutions, Inc. 's 1. 01β — meaning FISI is approximately 119% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 54% for Greene County Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GCBC or FISI or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Financial Institutions, Inc.
(FISI) is pulling ahead at 43. 1% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Financial Institutions, Inc. grew EPS 231. 3% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GCBC or FISI or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
Greene County Bancorp, Inc.
(GCBC) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 4% net margin versus 16. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRST leads at 29. 2% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GCBC or FISI or NBTB or CZWI or TRST more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Financial Institutions, Inc. (FISI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 94x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 66x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Financial Institutions, Inc. (FISI) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 16. 9x for TrustCo Bank Corp NY — 8. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NBTB: 2. 1% to $46. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GCBC or FISI or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Financial Institutions, Inc. (FISI) offers the highest yield at 3. 4%, versus 1. 1% for Greene County Bancorp, Inc. (GCBC).
09Is GCBC or FISI or NBTB or CZWI or TRST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, FISI: +67. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GCBC and FISI and NBTB and CZWI and TRST?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GCBC is a small-cap deep-value stock; FISI is a small-cap high-growth stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRST is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.