Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GCTS vs SWKS vs QCOM vs QRVO vs AVGO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
GCTS vs SWKS vs QCOM vs QRVO vs AVGO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $85M | $9.78B | $213.51B | $8.25B | $1.96T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $4.04B | $44.49B | $3.68B | $68.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-39M | $361M | $9.92B | $339M | $24.97B |
| Gross Margin | -0.2% | 41.1% | 54.8% | 45.9% | 67.1% |
| Operating Margin | -8.2% | 9.4% | 25.5% | 11.2% | 40.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.8x | 18.8x | 13.7x | 36.5x |
| Total Debt | $43M | $1.20B | $16.37B | $1.55B | $65.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $1.16B | $7.84B | $1.22B | $16.18B |
GCTS vs SWKS vs QCOM vs QRVO vs AVGO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GCT Semiconductor H… (GCTS) | 100 | 10.1 | -89.9% |
| Skyworks Solutions,… (SWKS) | 100 | 57.9 | -42.1% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 100 | 140.1 | +40.1% |
| Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO) | 100 | 79.0 | -21.0% |
| Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) | 100 | 369.6 | +269.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GCTS vs SWKS vs QCOM vs QRVO vs AVGO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GCTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.
- Beta 1.03 vs AVGO's 1.96
SWKS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 1.36, yield 4.3%, current ratio 2.33x
- 4.3% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs QCOM's 1.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
QCOM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 1.55, yield 1.7%
- 18.4% ROA vs GCTS's -162.0%
QRVO is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.31, Low D/E 46.3%, current ratio 3.24x
- Lower P/E (13.7x vs 18.8x)
AVGO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 23.9%, EPS growth 287.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.4%
- 29.0% 10Y total return vs QCOM's 350.2%
- PEG 0.73 vs QCOM's 9.06
- 23.9% revenue growth vs GCTS's -43.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.9% revenue growth vs GCTS's -43.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.7x vs 18.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.6% margin vs GCTS's -10.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs AVGO's 1.96 | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs QCOM's 1.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +102.6% vs SWKS's +1.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.4% ROA vs GCTS's -162.0% |
GCTS vs SWKS vs QCOM vs QRVO vs AVGO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
GCTS vs SWKS vs QCOM vs QRVO vs AVGO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AVGO leads in 2 of 6 categories
SWKS leads 1 • QCOM leads 1 • GCTS leads 0 • QRVO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVGO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $68.3B annually — 17539.7x GCTS's $4M. AVGO is the more profitable business, keeping 36.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GCTS's -10.1%. On growth, AVGO holds the edge at +29.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $4.0B | $44.5B | $3.7B | $68.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$31M | $842M | $12.8B | $607M | $38.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$39M | $361M | $9.9B | $339M | $25.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$27M | $697M | $12.5B | $680M | $28.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | +41.1% | +54.8% | +45.9% | +67.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.2% | +9.4% | +25.5% | +11.2% | +40.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.1% | +8.9% | +22.3% | +9.2% | +36.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.0% | +17.2% | +28.1% | +18.5% | +42.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -83.5% | -1.0% | -3.5% | -7.0% | +29.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -56.3% | -44.2% | +173.0% | -3.0% | +31.6% |
Valuation Metrics
SWKS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.1x trailing earnings, SWKS trades at a 76% valuation discount to AVGO's 86.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AVGO offers better value at 1.73x vs QCOM's 19.44x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $85M | $9.8B | $213.5B | $8.2B | $1.96T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $127M | $9.8B | $222.0B | $8.6B | $2.00T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.56x | 21.12x | 40.43x | 24.58x | 86.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.79x | 18.84x | 13.66x | 36.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 19.44x | — | 1.73x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.20x | 15.91x | 20.85x | 58.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.28x | 2.39x | 4.82x | 2.24x | 30.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.75x | 10.56x | 2.49x | 24.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.85x | 16.65x | 12.14x | 72.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
QCOM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QCOM delivers a 40.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $6 for SWKS. SWKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVGO's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QRVO scores 8/9 vs GCTS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +6.3% | +40.2% | +9.7% | +32.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -162.0% | +4.6% | +18.4% | +5.6% | +14.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +6.3% | +29.1% | +8.1% | +14.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +7.0% | +28.9% | +8.0% | +16.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.21x | 0.77x | 0.46x | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $42M | $42M | $8.5B | $330M | $49.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $1.2B | $7.8B | $1.2B | $16.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $43M | $1.2B | $16.4B | $1.5B | $65.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.17x | 14.46x | 17.60x | 6.34x | 9.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AVGO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AVGO five years ago would be worth $93,355 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,009 for GCTS. Over the past 12 months, AVGO leads with a +102.6% total return vs SWKS's +1.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AVGO at 88.2% vs GCTS's -53.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +23.0% | +2.1% | +17.6% | +3.1% | +18.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.9% | +1.5% | +42.9% | +24.8% | +102.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.9% | -30.3% | +96.4% | -5.5% | +566.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.9% | -55.5% | +58.5% | -51.7% | +833.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.9% | +31.2% | +350.2% | +95.0% | +2897.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -53.4% | -11.4% | +25.2% | -1.9% | +88.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GCTS and AVGO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GCTS is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AVGO's 1.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AVGO currently trades 94.3% from its 52-week high vs GCTS's 60.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.03x | 1.36x | 1.55x | 1.31x | 1.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.47 | $90.90 | $223.66 | $106.30 | $437.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.90 | $51.92 | $121.99 | $69.31 | $198.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.7% | +71.6% | +90.6% | +83.7% | +94.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.7 | 55.9 | 80.1 | 56.4 | 68.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 3.3M | 15.1M | 1.2M | 23.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SWKS and QCOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SWKS as "Buy", QCOM as "Hold", QRVO as "Hold", AVGO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.6% upside for AVGO (target: $444) vs -13.6% for QCOM (target: $175). For income investors, SWKS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.29% vs AVGO's 0.56%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $62.75 | $175.00 | $85.29 | $443.72 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 59 | 69 | 42 | 58 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.3% | +1.7% | — | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 12 | 23 | — | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.79 | $3.44 | — | $2.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% | +4.1% | +6.5% | +0.3% |
AVGO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SWKS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
GCTS vs SWKS vs QCOM vs QRVO vs AVGO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GCTS or SWKS or QCOM or QRVO or AVGO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) is the stronger pick with 23. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 0% for GCT Semiconductor Holding, Inc. (GCTS). Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) offers the better valuation at 21. 1x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) a "Buy" — based on 59 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GCTS or SWKS or QCOM or QRVO or AVGO?
On trailing P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) is the cheapest at 21. 1x versus Broadcom Inc. at 86. 5x. On forward P/E, Qorvo, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Broadcom Inc. wins at 0. 73x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GCTS or SWKS or QCOM or QRVO or AVGO?
Over the past 5 years, Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) delivered a total return of +833. 6%, compared to -89. 9% for GCT Semiconductor Holding, Inc. (GCTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AVGO returned +29. 0% versus GCTS's -89. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GCTS or SWKS or QCOM or QRVO or AVGO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GCT Semiconductor Holding, Inc.
(GCTS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus Broadcom Inc. 's 1. 96β — meaning AVGO is approximately 91% more volatile than GCTS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 80% for Broadcom Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GCTS or SWKS or QCOM or QRVO or AVGO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) is pulling ahead at 23. 9% versus -43. 0% for GCT Semiconductor Holding, Inc. (GCTS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Qorvo, Inc. grew EPS 524. 1% year-over-year, compared to -44. 2% for QUALCOMM Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, AVGO leads at 24. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GCTS or SWKS or QCOM or QRVO or AVGO?
Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 2% net margin versus -135. 6% for GCT Semiconductor Holding, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVGO leads at 39. 9% versus -143. 8% for GCTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVGO leads at 67. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GCTS or SWKS or QCOM or QRVO or AVGO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 73x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO) trades at 13. 7x forward P/E versus 36. 5x for Broadcom Inc. — 22. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVGO: 7. 6% to $443. 72.
08Which pays a better dividend — GCTS or SWKS or QCOM or QRVO or AVGO?
In this comparison, SWKS (4.
3% yield), QCOM (1. 7% yield), AVGO (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. GCTS, QRVO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GCTS or SWKS or QCOM or QRVO or AVGO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
7% yield, +350. 2% 10Y return). Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) carries a higher beta of 1. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (QCOM: +350. 2%, AVGO: +29. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GCTS and SWKS and QCOM and QRVO and AVGO?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GCTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SWKS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; QCOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock; QRVO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AVGO is a mega-cap high-growth stock. SWKS, QCOM, AVGO pay a dividend while GCTS, QRVO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.