Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GDS vs VNET
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
GDS vs VNET — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $8.44B | $2.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11.39B | $9.50B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $956M | $-568M |
| Gross Margin | 22.1% | 22.7% |
| Operating Margin | 13.2% | 9.0% |
| Forward P/E | 16.1x | 34.9x |
| Total Debt | $47.55B | $18.45B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14.32B | $2.04B |
GDS vs VNET — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GDS Holdings Limited (GDS) | 100 | 80.7 | -19.3% |
| VNET Group, Inc. (VNET) | 100 | 61.7 | -38.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GDS vs VNET
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GDS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.14
- 342.0% 10Y total return vs VNET's -51.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.14, current ratio 2.60x
VNET is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.4%, EPS growth 103.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.1%
- 11.4% revenue growth vs GDS's 7.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.4% revenue growth vs GDS's 7.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.1x vs 34.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.4% margin vs VNET's -6.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.14 vs VNET's 2.70, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +64.0% vs VNET's +31.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.2% ROA vs VNET's -1.5%, ROIC 1.8% vs 2.4% |
GDS vs VNET — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GDS vs VNET — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GDS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GDS and VNET operate at a comparable scale, with $11.4B and $9.5B in trailing revenue. GDS is the more profitable business, keeping 8.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VNET's -6.0%. On growth, VNET holds the edge at +23.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11.4B | $9.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.9B | $2.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $956M | -$568M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.3B | -$3.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.1% | +22.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +9.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | -6.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -11.0% | -40.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.1% | +23.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -158.3% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
GDS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 74.0x trailing earnings, GDS trades at a 21% valuation discount to VNET's 93.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VNET's 15.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GDS's 18.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.4B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.3B | $5.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 73.98x | 93.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.05x | 34.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.80x | 15.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.18x | 2.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.32x | 2.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
VNET leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GDS delivers a 3.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-8 for VNET. GDS carries lower financial leverage with a 1.71x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VNET's 2.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VNET scores 7/9 vs GDS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.7% | -7.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | -1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.8% | +2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +3.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.71x | 2.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $33.2B | $16.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14.3B | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $47.6B | $18.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.97x | 1.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GDS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GDS five years ago would be worth $6,231 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,635 for VNET. Over the past 12 months, GDS leads with a +64.0% total return vs VNET's +31.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GDS at 46.1% vs VNET's 44.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.0% | -1.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +64.0% | +31.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +212.1% | +201.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.7% | -63.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +342.0% | -51.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +46.1% | +44.4% |
Risk & Volatility
GDS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GDS is the less volatile stock with a 2.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VNET's 2.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GDS currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs VNET's 62.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.14x | 2.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.61 | $14.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.53 | $5.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.7% | +62.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.6 | 44.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 5.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GDS as "Buy" and VNET as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 161.4% upside for VNET (target: $24) vs 35.1% for GDS (target: $62).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $62.17 | $23.55 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GDS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). VNET leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency).
GDS vs VNET: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GDS or VNET a better buy right now?
For growth investors, VNET Group, Inc.
(VNET) is the stronger pick with 11. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 7% for GDS Holdings Limited (GDS). GDS Holdings Limited (GDS) offers the better valuation at 74. 0x trailing P/E (16. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GDS Holdings Limited (GDS) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GDS or VNET?
On trailing P/E, GDS Holdings Limited (GDS) is the cheapest at 74.
0x versus VNET Group, Inc. at 93. 1x. On forward P/E, GDS Holdings Limited is actually cheaper at 16. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GDS or VNET?
Over the past 5 years, GDS Holdings Limited (GDS) delivered a total return of -37.
7%, compared to -63. 7% for VNET Group, Inc. (VNET). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GDS returned +342. 0% versus VNET's -51. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GDS or VNET?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GDS Holdings Limited (GDS) is the lower-risk stock at 2.
14β versus VNET Group, Inc. 's 2. 70β — meaning VNET is approximately 26% more volatile than GDS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, GDS Holdings Limited (GDS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 171% versus 3% for VNET Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GDS or VNET?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), VNET Group, Inc.
(VNET) is pulling ahead at 11. 4% versus 7. 7% for GDS Holdings Limited (GDS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GDS Holdings Limited grew EPS 193. 0% year-over-year, compared to 103. 8% for VNET Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VNET leads at 10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GDS or VNET?
GDS Holdings Limited (GDS) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
3% net margin versus 2. 2% for VNET Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GDS leads at 13. 2% versus 8. 1% for VNET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VNET leads at 22. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GDS or VNET more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, GDS Holdings Limited (GDS) trades at 16.
1x forward P/E versus 34. 9x for VNET Group, Inc. — 18. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VNET: 161. 4% to $23. 55.
08Which pays a better dividend — GDS or VNET?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is GDS or VNET better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, GDS Holdings Limited (GDS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+342.
0% 10Y return). VNET Group, Inc. (VNET) carries a higher beta of 2. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GDS: +342. 0%, VNET: -51. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GDS and VNET?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.