GEL
Genesis Energy, L.P.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$2.02B
5Y Perf.+105.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
GEL vs XOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Oil & Gas Integrated
Market Cap$620.85B
5Y Perf.+222.2%
GEL vs XOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | GEL | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Market Cap | $2.02B | $620.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.68B | $323.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $48M | $28.84B |
| Gross Margin | 16.8% | 21.7% |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | 10.5% |
| Forward P/E | 20.9x | 14.8x |
| Total Debt | $3.05B | $43.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $10.68B |
GEL vs XOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
GEL
XOM
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genesis Energy, L.P. (GEL) | 100 | 205.4 | +105.4% |
| Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM) | 100 | 322.2 | +222.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GEL vs XOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: XOM leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Genesis Energy, L.P. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GEL
Genesis Energy, L.P.
The Income Pick
GEL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.32, yield 4.0%
- Beta 0.32, yield 4.0%, current ratio 0.98x
- 4.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs XOM's 2.7%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
The Growth Play
XOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -4.5%, EPS growth -14.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.7%
- 105.0% 10Y total return vs GEL's -8.4%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.15, Low D/E 16.3%, current ratio 1.15x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | XOM | -4.5% revenue growth vs GEL's -45.0% |
| Value | XOM | Lower P/E (14.8x vs 20.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | XOM | 8.9% margin vs GEL's 2.9% |
| Stability / Safety | XOM | Lower D/E ratio (16.3% vs 430.3%) |
| Dividends | GEL | 4.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs XOM's 2.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | XOM | +43.9% vs GEL's +19.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | XOM | 6.4% ROA vs GEL's 1.0%, ROIC 8.6% vs 4.0% |
GEL vs XOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
GEL vs XOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLGELLAGGINGXOM
XOMExxon Mobil Corporati…
2leads
GELGenesis Energy, L.P.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs XOMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
GEL4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
GEL4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
XOM6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
XOM4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GEL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 193.0x GEL's $1.7B. XOM is the more profitable business, keeping 8.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GEL's 2.9%. On growth, GEL holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | GELGenesis Energy, L… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $323.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $550M | $59.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $48M | $28.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $209M | $23.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | +21.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.6% | +10.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.5% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.1% | -1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +103.9% | -11.0% |
GEL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
GEL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, GEL's 10.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than XOM's 10.9x.
| Metric | GELGenesis Energy, L… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $620.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.1B | $653.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -22.56x | 21.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.85x | 14.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.31x | 10.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.24x | 1.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.85x | 2.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.83x | 26.29x |
GEL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XOM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XOM delivers a 10.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $6 for GEL. XOM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GEL's 4.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GEL scores 4/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | GELGenesis Energy, L… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.1% | +10.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.0% | +8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.0% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.30x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.0B | $32.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.0B | $43.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.97x | 69.44x |
XOM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XOM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XOM five years ago would be worth $26,464 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20,901 for GEL. Over the past 12 months, XOM leads with a +43.9% total return vs GEL's +19.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GEL at 23.2% vs XOM's 13.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | GELGenesis Energy, L… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.0% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.5% | +43.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.9% | +44.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.0% | +164.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.4% | +105.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.2% | +13.2% |
XOM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GEL and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GEL's 0.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GEL currently trades 88.4% from its 52-week high vs XOM's 83.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | GELGenesis Energy, L… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.32x | -0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.64 | $176.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.21 | $101.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.4% | +83.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.4 | 42.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 246K | 18.9M |
Evenly matched — GEL and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GEL and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GEL as "Buy" and XOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.4% upside for GEL (target: $20) vs 9.5% for XOM (target: $160). For income investors, GEL offers the higher dividend yield at 4.01% vs XOM's 2.73%.
| Metric | GELGenesis Energy, L… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.00 | $160.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.0% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 26 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.66 | $4.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +13.0% | +3.3% |
Evenly matched — GEL and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
GEL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). XOM leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallGenesis Energy, L.P. (GEL)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
GEL vs XOM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GEL or XOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger pick with -4.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -45. 0% for Genesis Energy, L. P. (GEL). Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) offers the better valuation at 21. 9x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Genesis Energy, L. P. (GEL) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GEL or XOM?
On forward P/E, Exxon Mobil Corporation is actually cheaper at 14.
8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GEL or XOM?
Over the past 5 years, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) delivered a total return of +164.
6%, compared to +109. 0% for Genesis Energy, L. P. (GEL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XOM returned +105. 0% versus GEL's -8. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GEL or XOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus Genesis Energy, L. P. 's 0. 32β — meaning GEL is approximately -320% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 4% for Genesis Energy, L. P. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GEL or XOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is pulling ahead at -4.
5% versus -45. 0% for Genesis Energy, L. P. (GEL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Genesis Energy, L. P. grew EPS 41. 1% year-over-year, compared to -14. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, XOM leads at -6. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GEL or XOM?
Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
9% net margin versus -0. 5% for Genesis Energy, L. P. — meaning it keeps 8. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GEL leads at 15. 8% versus 10. 5% for XOM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XOM leads at 21. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GEL or XOM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) trades at 14.
8x forward P/E versus 20. 9x for Genesis Energy, L. P. — 6. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GEL: 21. 4% to $20. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GEL or XOM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Genesis Energy, L. P. (GEL) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 2. 7% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM).
09Is GEL or XOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 7% yield, +105. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +105. 0%, GEL: -8. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GEL and XOM?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GEL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(GEL: 12.1% · XOM: -1.3%)Net Margin>
%
(GEL: 2.9% · XOM: 8.9%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.