Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GENK vs CMG vs TXRH vs SHAK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GENK
GEN Restaurant Group, Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$12M
5Y Perf.-86.6%
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$43.33B
5Y Perf.-22.2%
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.41B
5Y Perf.+40.7%
SHAK
Shake Shack Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.79B
5Y Perf.-10.9%

GENK vs CMG vs TXRH vs SHAK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GENK logoGENK
CMG logoCMG
TXRH logoTXRH
SHAK logoSHAK
IndustryRestaurantsRestaurantsRestaurantsRestaurants
Market Cap$12M$43.33B$10.41B$2.79B
Revenue (TTM)$217M$12.14B$6.06B$1.49B
Net Income (TTM)$-1M$1.45B$415M$41M
Gross Margin9.5%36.1%18.7%7.5%
Operating Margin-4.2%15.8%8.2%4.3%
Forward P/E17.5x29.3x25.0x50.2x
Total Debt$163M$9.85B$1.89B$902M
Cash & Equiv.$24M$351M$135M$360M

GENK vs CMG vs TXRH vs SHAKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GENK
CMG
TXRH
SHAK
StockJun 23May 26Return
GEN Restaurant Grou… (GENK)10013.4-86.6%
Chipotle Mexican Gr… (CMG)10077.8-22.2%
Texas Roadhouse, In… (TXRH)100140.7+40.7%
Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK)10089.1-10.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GENK vs CMG vs TXRH vs SHAK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CMG leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Texas Roadhouse, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. GENK and SHAK also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GENK
GEN Restaurant Group, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

GENK is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 1.53, yield 7.9%, current ratio 0.83x
  • 7.9% yield, vs TXRH's 1.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: defensive
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
The Value Pick

CMG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.83 vs TXRH's 1.17
  • Lower P/E (29.3x vs 50.2x)
  • 12.0% margin vs GENK's -0.6%
  • 16.0% ROA vs GENK's -0.6%, ROIC 15.3% vs 0.2%
Best for: valuation efficiency
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
The Income Pick

TXRH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 1.7%
  • 288.0% 10Y total return vs CMG's 267.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.70, current ratio 0.50x
  • Beta 0.70 vs SHAK's 1.75, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
SHAK
Shake Shack Inc.
The Growth Play

SHAK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 15.4%, EPS growth 354.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.1%
  • 15.4% revenue growth vs CMG's 5.4%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSHAK logoSHAK15.4% revenue growth vs CMG's 5.4%
ValueCMG logoCMGLower P/E (29.3x vs 50.2x)
Quality / MarginsCMG logoCMG12.0% margin vs GENK's -0.6%
Stability / SafetyTXRH logoTXRHBeta 0.70 vs SHAK's 1.75, lower leverage
DividendsGENK logoGENK7.9% yield, vs TXRH's 1.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)TXRH logoTXRH-6.2% vs GENK's -48.6%
Efficiency (ROA)CMG logoCMG16.0% ROA vs GENK's -0.6%, ROIC 15.3% vs 0.2%

GENK vs CMG vs TXRH vs SHAK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GENKGEN Restaurant Group, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CMGChipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
FY 2025
Food and Beverage
99.5%$11.9B
Delivery Service
0.5%$60M
TXRHTexas Roadhouse, Inc.
FY 2025
Food and Beverage
99.5%$5.8B
Franchise royalties
0.5%$28M
Franchise fees
0.0%$3M
SHAKShake Shack Inc.
FY 2025
Shack Sales
96.3%$1.4B
Sales-Based Royalties
3.6%$52M
Initial Territory and Opening Fees
0.2%$3M

GENK vs CMG vs TXRH vs SHAK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCMGLAGGINGSHAK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CMG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

CMG is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.1B annually — 55.8x GENK's $217M. CMG is the more profitable business, keeping 12.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GENK's -0.6%. On growth, SHAK holds the edge at +14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGENK logoGENKGEN Restaurant Gr…CMG logoCMGChipotle Mexican …TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$217M$12.1B$6.1B$1.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$4M$2.3B$709M$173M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$1M$1.5B$415M$41M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$19M$1.5B$441M$16M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+9.5%+36.1%+18.7%+7.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-4.2%+15.8%+8.2%+4.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-0.6%+12.0%+6.8%+2.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-8.5%+12.4%+7.3%+1.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.7%+7.4%+12.8%+14.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-12.0%-17.9%+10.0%-110.0%
CMG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

GENK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 17.5x trailing earnings, GENK trades at a 72% valuation discount to SHAK's 63.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TXRH offers better value at 0.38x vs CMG's 0.82x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricGENK logoGENKGEN Restaurant Gr…CMG logoCMGChipotle Mexican …TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.
Market CapShares × price$12M$43.3B$10.4B$2.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$151M$52.8B$12.2B$3.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS17.54x29.18x25.89x63.53x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.29.29x25.05x50.21x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.82x0.38x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.69x22.25x17.15x17.31x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.06x3.63x1.77x1.93x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.24x15.78x7.09x5.23x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF29.93x30.44x49.34x
GENK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CMG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

CMG delivers a 48.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $-3 for GENK. TXRH carries lower financial leverage with a 1.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GENK's 3.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SHAK scores 7/9 vs GENK's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricGENK logoGENKGEN Restaurant Gr…CMG logoCMGChipotle Mexican …TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-3.2%+48.4%+37.4%+7.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-0.6%+16.0%+12.2%+2.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+0.2%+15.3%+14.5%+6.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+0.3%+25.4%+20.1%+5.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93547
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage3.69x3.48x1.27x1.63x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$139M$9.5B$1.8B$542M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$24M$351M$135M$360M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$163M$9.8B$1.9B$902M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-15.38x16.87x
CMG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TXRH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TXRH five years ago would be worth $16,160 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,506 for GENK. Over the past 12 months, TXRH leads with a -6.2% total return vs GENK's -48.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TXRH at 15.4% vs GENK's -46.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGENK logoGENKGEN Restaurant Gr…CMG logoCMGChipotle Mexican …TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-1.3%-11.3%-7.4%-17.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-48.6%-35.6%-6.2%-32.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-84.9%-18.2%+53.6%+3.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-84.9%+16.7%+61.6%-22.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-84.9%+267.2%+288.0%+98.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-46.8%-6.5%+15.4%+1.1%
TXRH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

TXRH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

TXRH is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHAK's 1.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TXRH currently trades 79.0% from its 52-week high vs GENK's 43.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGENK logoGENKGEN Restaurant Gr…CMG logoCMGChipotle Mexican …TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.53x1.11x0.70x1.75x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.26$58.42$199.99$144.65
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.43$29.75$153.82$67.20
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+43.3%+56.9%+79.0%+47.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10074.543.045.748.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded46K14.5M983K1.5M
TXRH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — GENK and TXRH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CMG as "Buy", TXRH as "Hold", SHAK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 74.6% upside for SHAK (target: $121) vs 21.3% for TXRH (target: $192). For income investors, GENK offers the higher dividend yield at 7.94% vs TXRH's 1.72%.

MetricGENK logoGENKGEN Restaurant Gr…CMG logoCMGChipotle Mexican …TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$43.72$191.64$120.89
# AnalystsCovering analysts674335
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+7.9%+1.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises050
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.18$2.71
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+5.6%+1.4%0.0%
Evenly matched — GENK and TXRH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CMG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TXRH leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.

Best OverallChipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GENK vs CMG vs TXRH vs SHAK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GENK or CMG or TXRH or SHAK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Shake Shack Inc.

(SHAK) is the stronger pick with 15. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG). GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. (GENK) offers the better valuation at 17. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) a "Buy" — based on 67 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GENK or CMG or TXRH or SHAK?

On trailing P/E, GEN Restaurant Group, Inc.

(GENK) is the cheapest at 17. 5x versus Shake Shack Inc. at 63. 5x. On forward P/E, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. is actually cheaper at 25. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. wins at 0. 83x versus Texas Roadhouse, Inc. 's 1. 17x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GENK or CMG or TXRH or SHAK?

Over the past 5 years, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

(TXRH) delivered a total return of +61. 6%, compared to -84. 9% for GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. (GENK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TXRH returned +288. 0% versus GENK's -84. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GENK or CMG or TXRH or SHAK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

(TXRH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 70β versus Shake Shack Inc. 's 1. 75β — meaning SHAK is approximately 151% more volatile than TXRH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 127% versus 4% for GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GENK or CMG or TXRH or SHAK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shake Shack Inc.

(SHAK) is pulling ahead at 15. 4% versus 5. 4% for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Shake Shack Inc. grew EPS 354. 2% year-over-year, compared to -5. 7% for Texas Roadhouse, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHAK leads at 17. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GENK or CMG or TXRH or SHAK?

Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

(CMG) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus 0. 3% for GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CMG leads at 16. 9% versus 0. 2% for GENK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CMG leads at 25. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GENK or CMG or TXRH or SHAK more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 83x versus Texas Roadhouse, Inc. 's 1. 17x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) trades at 25. 0x forward P/E versus 50. 2x for Shake Shack Inc. — 25. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHAK: 74. 6% to $120. 89.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GENK or CMG or TXRH or SHAK?

In this comparison, GENK (7.

9% yield), TXRH (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. CMG, SHAK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is GENK or CMG or TXRH or SHAK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

(TXRH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 70), 1. 7% yield, +288. 0% 10Y return). Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK) carries a higher beta of 1. 75 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXRH: +288. 0%, SHAK: +98. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GENK and CMG and TXRH and SHAK?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GENK is a small-cap high-growth stock; CMG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TXRH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SHAK is a small-cap high-growth stock. GENK, TXRH pay a dividend while CMG, SHAK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

GENK

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 3.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CMG

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TXRH

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHAK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GENK and CMG and TXRH and SHAK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GENK: 2.7% · CMG: 7.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(GENK: 17.5x · CMG: 29.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.