Financial - Mortgages
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GHLD vs UWMC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Mortgages
GHLD vs UWMC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Mortgages | Financial - Mortgages |
| Market Cap | $439M | $724M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.17B | $3.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $126M | $27M |
| Gross Margin | 90.6% | 85.6% |
| Operating Margin | 10.1% | 58.0% |
| Forward P/E | 10.2x | 8.1x |
| Total Debt | $3.03B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $118M | $503M |
GHLD vs UWMC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | Nov 25 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guild Holdings Comp… (GHLD) | 100 | 135.7 | +35.7% |
| UWM Holdings Corpor… (UWMC) | 100 | 56.6 | -43.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GHLD vs UWMC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GHLD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 58.4% 10Y total return vs UWMC's -40.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.04, current ratio 0.09x
- Beta 0.04, yield 2.5%, current ratio 0.09x
UWMC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.50, yield 10.9%
- Rev growth 65.8%, EPS growth -7.7%
- 65.8% NII/revenue growth vs GHLD's 60.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.8% NII/revenue growth vs GHLD's 60.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 10.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs GHLD's 0.8% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs UWMC's 1.50 | |
| Dividends | 10.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GHLD's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.4% vs UWMC's -19.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs GHLD's 0.8% |
GHLD vs UWMC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GHLD vs UWMC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GHLD leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UWMC is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 2.7x GHLD's $1.2B. GHLD is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UWMC's 0.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $199M | $695M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $126M | $27M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $25M | -$6.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.6% | +85.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.1% | +58.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | +0.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -56.9% | -83.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +148.6% | — |
Valuation Metrics
UWMC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.8x trailing earnings, GHLD trades at a 55% valuation discount to UWMC's 28.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UWMC's 0.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GHLD's 21.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $439M | $724M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.4B | $221M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.83x | 28.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.23x | 8.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.17x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.40x | 0.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.37x | 0.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.99x | 0.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
UWMC leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GHLD delivers a 10.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $1 for UWMC. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UWMC scores 4/9 vs GHLD's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.3% | +0.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.4% | +15.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.2% | +11.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.42x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.9B | -$503M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $118M | $503M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.0B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.47x | 0.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GHLD leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GHLD five years ago would be worth $15,499 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,955 for UWMC. Over the past 12 months, GHLD leads with a +57.4% total return vs UWMC's -19.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GHLD at 30.0% vs UWMC's -7.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | -20.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +57.4% | -19.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +119.6% | -20.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.0% | -30.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.4% | -40.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.0% | -7.4% |
Risk & Volatility
GHLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GHLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UWMC's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GHLD currently trades 84.9% from its 52-week high vs UWMC's 48.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.04x | 1.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.57 | $7.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.99 | $3.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.9% | +48.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.7 | 42.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 152K | 15.7M |
Analyst Outlook
UWMC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GHLD as "Hold" and UWMC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 74.6% upside for UWMC (target: $6) vs -11.9% for GHLD (target: $18). For income investors, UWMC offers the higher dividend yield at 10.85% vs GHLD's 2.47%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.63 | $5.98 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.5% | +10.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.49 | $0.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% |
GHLD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). UWMC leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
GHLD vs UWMC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GHLD or UWMC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) is the stronger pick with 65.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 60. 9% for Guild Holdings Company (GHLD). Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (10. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) a "Hold" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GHLD or UWMC?
On trailing P/E, Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) is the cheapest at 12.
8x versus UWM Holdings Corporation at 28. 5x. On forward P/E, UWM Holdings Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GHLD or UWMC?
Over the past 5 years, Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) delivered a total return of +55.
0%, compared to -30. 4% for UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GHLD returned +58. 4% versus UWMC's -40. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GHLD or UWMC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
04β versus UWM Holdings Corporation's 1. 50β — meaning UWMC is approximately 3473% more volatile than GHLD relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — GHLD or UWMC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) is pulling ahead at 65.
8% versus 60. 9% for Guild Holdings Company (GHLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guild Holdings Company grew EPS 343. 8% year-over-year, compared to -7. 7% for UWM Holdings Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GHLD or UWMC?
Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
3% net margin versus 0. 9% for UWM Holdings Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UWMC leads at 58. 0% versus 10. 1% for GHLD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GHLD leads at 90. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GHLD or UWMC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) trades at 8.
1x forward P/E versus 10. 2x for Guild Holdings Company — 2. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UWMC: 74. 6% to $5. 98.
08Which pays a better dividend — GHLD or UWMC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) offers the highest yield at 10. 9%, versus 2. 5% for Guild Holdings Company (GHLD).
09Is GHLD or UWMC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
04), 2. 5% yield). UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) carries a higher beta of 1. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GHLD: +58. 4%, UWMC: -40. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GHLD and UWMC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.