Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GHM vs GTLS vs FWRD vs CECO vs PRIM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Engineering & Construction
GHM vs GTLS vs FWRD vs CECO vs PRIM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $1.07B | $9.93B | $547M | $2.92B | $5.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $238M | $4.26B | $2.46B | $812M | $7.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15M | $40M | $-91M | $17M | $248M |
| Gross Margin | 24.6% | 32.6% | 23.1% | 34.3% | 10.4% |
| Operating Margin | 7.7% | 8.5% | 2.1% | 7.6% | 4.9% |
| Forward P/E | 79.7x | 16.4x | — | 48.8x | 18.1x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $3.74B | $2.16B | $25M | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $22M | $366M | $106M | $33M | $541M |
GHM vs GTLS vs FWRD vs CECO vs PRIM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Graham Corporation (GHM) | 100 | 848.6 | +748.6% |
| Chart Industries, I… (GTLS) | 100 | 528.4 | +428.4% |
| Forward Air Corpora… (FWRD) | 100 | 34.9 | -65.1% |
| CECO Environmental … (CECO) | 100 | 1532.6 | +1432.6% |
| Primoris Services C… (PRIM) | 100 | 647.2 | +547.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GHM vs GTLS vs FWRD vs CECO vs PRIM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GHM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality.
- 6.3% margin vs FWRD's -3.7%
GTLS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, current ratio 1.36x
- Beta 0.56, yield 0.3%, current ratio 1.36x
- Beta 0.56 vs FWRD's 2.28, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, FWRD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CECO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 38.8%, EPS growth 280.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.4%
- 12.8% 10Y total return vs GHM's 439.3%
- 38.8% revenue growth vs FWRD's 0.8%
- +220.1% vs FWRD's +0.6%
PRIM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.83, yield 0.3%
- PEG 0.98 vs GHM's 1.88
- Lower P/E (18.1x vs 48.8x), PEG 0.98 vs 1.14
- 0.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs GTLS's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 38.8% revenue growth vs FWRD's 0.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.1x vs 48.8x), PEG 0.98 vs 1.14 | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.3% margin vs FWRD's -3.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs FWRD's 2.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs GTLS's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +220.1% vs FWRD's +0.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.6% ROA vs FWRD's -3.3%, ROIC 13.6% vs 1.2% |
GHM vs GTLS vs FWRD vs CECO vs PRIM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GHM vs GTLS vs FWRD vs CECO vs PRIM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRIM leads in 2 of 6 categories
GTLS leads 1 • GHM leads 0 • FWRD leads 0 • CECO leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GHM and GTLS and CECO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRIM is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 31.5x GHM's $238M. GHM is the more profitable business, keeping 6.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FWRD's -3.7%. On growth, CECO holds the edge at +21.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $238M | $4.3B | $2.5B | $812M | $7.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $25M | $644M | $206M | $86M | $437M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15M | $40M | -$91M | $17M | $248M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $203M | $38M | $4M | $165M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.6% | +32.6% | +23.1% | +34.3% | +10.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +8.5% | +2.1% | +7.6% | +4.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | +0.9% | -3.7% | +2.1% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +4.8% | +1.6% | +0.5% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.5% | -2.5% | -5.1% | +21.5% | -5.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +78.6% | -36.1% | +35.1% | -91.8% | -60.5% |
Valuation Metrics
PRIM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.5x trailing earnings, PRIM trades at a 97% valuation discount to GTLS's 628.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PRIM offers better value at 1.17x vs GHM's 2.07x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $9.9B | $547M | $2.9B | $5.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $13.3B | $2.6B | $2.9B | $6.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 87.46x | 628.45x | -4.98x | 59.40x | 21.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 79.70x | 16.40x | — | 48.83x | 18.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.07x | — | — | 1.39x | 1.17x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 49.80x | 14.33x | 13.75x | 38.01x | 13.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.08x | 2.33x | 0.22x | 3.77x | 0.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.98x | 2.79x | 3.32x | 9.22x | 3.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 199.05x | 48.95x | 35.82x | — | 17.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRIM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PRIM delivers a 15.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-53 for FWRD. GHM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FWRD's 13.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GHM scores 7/9 vs PRIM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.4% | +1.2% | -52.6% | +5.4% | +15.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.1% | +0.4% | -3.3% | +1.9% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.3% | +7.4% | +1.2% | +10.0% | +13.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.5% | +8.6% | +1.5% | +9.4% | +16.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 1.11x | 13.36x | 0.08x | 0.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15M | $3.4B | $2.1B | -$8M | $735M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $22M | $366M | $106M | $33M | $541M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $3.7B | $2.2B | $25M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.08x | 0.32x | 2.74x | 21.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — GHM and CECO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CECO five years ago would be worth $110,271 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,978 for FWRD. Over the past 12 months, CECO leads with a +220.1% total return vs FWRD's +0.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GHM at 98.2% vs FWRD's -42.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +46.2% | +0.6% | -31.0% | +36.1% | -17.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +192.5% | +37.6% | +0.6% | +220.1% | +62.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +679.1% | +62.7% | -81.3% | +572.0% | +346.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +572.3% | +29.5% | -80.2% | +1002.7% | +234.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +439.3% | +772.5% | -47.3% | +1281.8% | +402.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +98.2% | +17.6% | -42.8% | +88.7% | +64.7% |
Risk & Volatility
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FWRD's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTLS currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs PRIM's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.24x | 0.56x | 2.28x | 1.36x | 1.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $100.96 | $208.51 | $32.47 | $90.25 | $205.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $32.90 | $140.50 | $14.81 | $24.71 | $65.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.2% | +99.5% | +53.4% | +90.2% | +52.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.3 | 51.2 | 42.4 | 75.7 | 30.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 127K | 1.6M | 733K | 673K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FWRD and PRIM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GHM as "Hold", GTLS as "Buy", FWRD as "Hold", CECO as "Buy", PRIM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 113.5% upside for FWRD (target: $37) vs -17.6% for GHM (target: $80). For income investors, PRIM offers the higher dividend yield at 0.29% vs GTLS's 0.29%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $80.00 | $193.81 | $37.00 | $86.20 | $160.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 37 | 21 | 15 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% | — | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.60 | — | — | $0.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
PRIM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). GTLS leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 3 tied.
GHM vs GTLS vs FWRD vs CECO vs PRIM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GHM or GTLS or FWRD or CECO or PRIM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CECO Environmental Corp.
(CECO) is the stronger pick with 38. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 8% for Forward Air Corporation (FWRD). Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) offers the better valuation at 21. 5x trailing P/E (18. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GHM or GTLS or FWRD or CECO or PRIM?
On trailing P/E, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the cheapest at 21.
5x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 628. 5x. On forward P/E, Chart Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Primoris Services Corporation wins at 0. 98x versus Graham Corporation's 1. 88x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GHM or GTLS or FWRD or CECO or PRIM?
Over the past 5 years, CECO Environmental Corp.
(CECO) delivered a total return of +1003%, compared to -80. 2% for Forward Air Corporation (FWRD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CECO returned +1282% versus FWRD's -47. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GHM or GTLS or FWRD or CECO or PRIM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus Forward Air Corporation's 2. 28β — meaning FWRD is approximately 310% more volatile than GTLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Graham Corporation (GHM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 13% for Forward Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GHM or GTLS or FWRD or CECO or PRIM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CECO Environmental Corp.
(CECO) is pulling ahead at 38. 8% versus 0. 8% for Forward Air Corporation (FWRD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CECO Environmental Corp. grew EPS 280. 6% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GHM or GTLS or FWRD or CECO or PRIM?
CECO Environmental Corp.
(CECO) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 5% net margin versus -4. 3% for Forward Air Corporation — meaning it keeps 6. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GTLS leads at 15. 2% versus 1. 5% for FWRD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CECO leads at 32. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GHM or GTLS or FWRD or CECO or PRIM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 98x versus Graham Corporation's 1. 88x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 79. 7x for Graham Corporation — 63. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FWRD: 113. 5% to $37. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GHM or GTLS or FWRD or CECO or PRIM?
In this comparison, PRIM (0.
3% yield), GTLS (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. GHM, FWRD, CECO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GHM or GTLS or FWRD or CECO or PRIM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), +772. 5% 10Y return). Forward Air Corporation (FWRD) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTLS: +772. 5%, FWRD: -47. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GHM and GTLS and FWRD and CECO and PRIM?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GHM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GTLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FWRD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CECO is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRIM is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.