Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GHRS vs DBVT vs ABBV vs ALKS vs LLY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
GHRS vs DBVT vs ABBV vs ALKS vs LLY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $1.30B | $1712.35T | $358.42B | $5.90B | $921.16B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $61.16B | $1.56B | $72.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-48M | $-168M | $4.23B | $153M | $25.27B |
| Gross Margin | — | — | 70.2% | 65.4% | 83.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | 26.7% | 12.3% | 45.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 14.3x | 24.8x | 28.2x |
| Total Debt | $512K | $22M | $69.07B | $70M | $42.50B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $246M | $194M | $5.23B | $1.12B | $7.16B |
GHRS vs DBVT vs ABBV vs ALKS vs LLY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GH Research PLC (GHRS) | 100 | 96.7 | -3.3% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 36.6 | -63.4% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 179.9 | +79.9% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 144.4 | +44.4% |
| Eli Lilly and Compa… (LLY) | 100 | 424.8 | +324.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GHRS vs DBVT vs ABBV vs ALKS vs LLY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GHRS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
DBVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +110.4% vs ABBV's +11.3%
ABBV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 3.2%
- Beta 0.34, yield 3.2%, current ratio 0.67x
- Lower P/E (14.3x vs 28.2x)
- Beta 0.34 vs GHRS's 1.72
ALKS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 3.55x
LLY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 44.7%, EPS growth 96.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.7%
- 12.4% 10Y total return vs ABBV's 295.5%
- 44.7% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
- 35.0% margin vs DBVT's 0.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 44.7% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.3x vs 28.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.0% margin vs DBVT's 0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs GHRS's 1.72 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs LLY's 0.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.4% vs ABBV's +11.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.7% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
GHRS vs DBVT vs ABBV vs ALKS vs LLY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
GHRS vs DBVT vs ABBV vs ALKS vs LLY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LLY leads in 2 of 6 categories
GHRS leads 1 • ABBV leads 1 • DBVT leads 0 • ALKS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LLY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LLY and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $72.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. LLY is the more profitable business, keeping 35.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ABBV's 6.9%. On growth, LLY holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $61.2B | $1.6B | $72.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$60M | -$112M | $24.5B | $212M | $34.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$48M | -$168M | $4.2B | $153M | $25.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$44M | -$151M | $18.7B | $392M | $13.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | +70.2% | +65.4% | +83.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | +26.7% | +12.3% | +45.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | +6.9% | +9.8% | +35.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | +30.6% | +25.1% | +18.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +10.0% | +28.2% | +55.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.3% | +91.5% | +57.4% | -4.1% | +169.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ABBV and ALKS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.8x trailing earnings, ALKS trades at a 71% valuation discount to ABBV's 85.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ABBV's 15.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LLY's 30.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $1712.35T | $358.4B | $5.9B | $921.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $1712.35T | $422.3B | $4.9B | $956.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -26.59x | -0.76x | 85.50x | 24.76x | 42.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 14.28x | — | 28.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.47x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 14.96x | 17.25x | 30.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 5.86x | 4.00x | 14.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.59x | 0.66x | — | 3.28x | 32.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 20.12x | 12.28x | 102.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LLY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. GHRS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LLY's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LLY scores 8/9 vs GHRS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -16.3% | -130.2% | +62.1% | +8.8% | +101.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.8% | -89.0% | +3.1% | +5.4% | +22.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -80.7% | — | +23.9% | +18.9% | +41.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -26.4% | -145.7% | +21.5% | +14.2% | +46.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.13x | — | 0.04x | 1.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$246M | -$172M | $63.8B | -$1.0B | $35.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $246M | $194M | $5.2B | $1.1B | $7.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $512,000 | $22M | $69.1B | $70M | $42.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -109.68x | -189.82x | 3.28x | 32.30x | 35.68x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GHRS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LLY five years ago would be worth $51,115 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,090 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs ABBV's +11.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GHRS at 33.1% vs ALKS's 4.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +58.7% | +4.9% | -10.1% | +25.3% | -9.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +104.6% | +110.4% | +11.3% | +16.5% | +26.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +135.8% | +19.7% | +50.4% | +14.5% | +129.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.1% | -69.1% | +101.3% | +60.9% | +411.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.1% | -87.0% | +295.5% | -11.0% | +1237.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.1% | +6.2% | +14.6% | +4.6% | +31.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ABBV and ALKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GHRS's 1.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs DBVT's 76.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.72x | 1.26x | 0.34x | 1.06x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.66 | $26.18 | $244.81 | $36.60 | $1133.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.46 | $7.53 | $176.57 | $25.17 | $623.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.2% | +76.3% | +82.8% | +96.7% | +86.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.3 | 48.1 | 46.8 | 60.2 | 61.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 227K | 252K | 5.8M | 2.3M | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
ABBV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GHRS as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy", LLY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 24.3% for ALKS (target: $44). For income investors, ABBV offers the higher dividend yield at 3.24% vs LLY's 0.61%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $36.50 | $46.33 | $256.64 | $44.00 | $1258.47 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 15 | 41 | 28 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +3.2% | — | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 13 | 0 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $6.57 | — | $6.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% | +0.5% | +0.4% |
LLY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GHRS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
GHRS vs DBVT vs ABBV vs ALKS vs LLY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GHRS or DBVT or ABBV or ALKS or LLY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the stronger pick with 44.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). Alkermes plc (ALKS) offers the better valuation at 24. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GH Research PLC (GHRS) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GHRS or DBVT or ABBV or ALKS or LLY?
On trailing P/E, Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the cheapest at 24.
8x versus AbbVie Inc. at 85. 5x. On forward P/E, AbbVie Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GHRS or DBVT or ABBV or ALKS or LLY?
Over the past 5 years, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) delivered a total return of +411.
1%, compared to -69. 1% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LLY returned +1238% versus DBVT's -87. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GHRS or DBVT or ABBV or ALKS or LLY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus GH Research PLC's 1. 72β — meaning GHRS is approximately 409% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, GH Research PLC (GHRS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 160% for Eli Lilly and Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GHRS or DBVT or ABBV or ALKS or LLY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is pulling ahead at 44.
7% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Eli Lilly and Company grew EPS 96. 0% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LLY leads at 31. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GHRS or DBVT or ABBV or ALKS or LLY?
Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
7% net margin versus 0. 0% for DBV Technologies S. A. — meaning it keeps 31. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LLY leads at 45. 6% versus 0. 0% for DBVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALKS leads at 86. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GHRS or DBVT or ABBV or ALKS or LLY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) trades at 14. 3x forward P/E versus 28. 2x for Eli Lilly and Company — 14. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 131. 8% to $46. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — GHRS or DBVT or ABBV or ALKS or LLY?
In this comparison, ABBV (3.
2% yield), LLY (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. GHRS, DBVT, ALKS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GHRS or DBVT or ABBV or ALKS or LLY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
71), 0. 6% yield, +1238% 10Y return). GH Research PLC (GHRS) carries a higher beta of 1. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LLY: +1238%, GHRS: +9. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GHRS and DBVT and ABBV and ALKS and LLY?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GHRS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LLY is a large-cap high-growth stock. ABBV, LLY pay a dividend while GHRS, DBVT, ALKS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.