Software - Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GIFT vs FLWS vs GFAI vs PRTS vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Security & Protection Services
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
GIFT vs FLWS vs GFAI vs PRTS vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Services | Specialty Retail | Security & Protection Services | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $29M | $292M | $10M | $59M | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $86M | $1.55B | $72M | $548M | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $-134M | $-24M | $-50M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 15.3% | 38.1% | 15.1% | 32.8% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | -14.4% | -8.2% | -27.4% | -8.9% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $271M | $3M | $25M | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $47M | $22M | $26M | $86.81B |
GIFT vs FLWS vs GFAI vs PRTS vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Giftify, Inc. (GIFT) | 100 | 31.4 | -68.6% |
| 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, … (FLWS) | 100 | 57.0 | -43.0% |
| Guardforce AI Co., … (GFAI) | 100 | 38.1 | -61.9% |
| CarParts.com, Inc. (PRTS) | 100 | 105.5 | +5.5% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 151.9 | +51.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GIFT vs FLWS vs GFAI vs PRTS vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GIFT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 1.04
- Lower volatility, beta 1.04, Low D/E 46.7%, current ratio 0.73x
- Beta 1.04 vs GFAI's 2.31
FLWS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 1.28, current ratio 1.28x
GFAI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, PRTS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 29.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs FLWS's -42.5%
- 12.4% revenue growth vs FLWS's -8.0%
- 12.2% margin vs GFAI's -32.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs FLWS's -8.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs GFAI's -32.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.04 vs GFAI's 2.31 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.7% vs GFAI's -53.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs GFAI's -50.2%, ROIC 14.7% vs -41.6% |
GIFT vs FLWS vs GFAI vs PRTS vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
GIFT vs FLWS vs GFAI vs PRTS vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMZN leads in 3 of 6 categories
GIFT leads 0 • FLWS leads 0 • GFAI leads 0 • PRTS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 10256.3x GFAI's $72M. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GFAI's -32.9%. On growth, AMZN holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $86M | $1.5B | $72M | $548M | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | -$74M | -$12M | -$33M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | -$134M | -$24M | -$50M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10,344 | -$16M | -$6M | -$52M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +38.1% | +15.1% | +32.8% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -14.4% | -8.2% | -27.4% | -8.9% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -14.0% | -8.7% | -32.9% | -9.2% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | -1.0% | -8.8% | -9.4% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.1% | -11.6% | +3.6% | -9.8% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +49.9% | +44.3% | +38.9% | +55.2% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FLWS and GFAI and PRTS each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $29M | $292M | $10M | $59M | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $36M | $516M | -$9M | $59M | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.28x | -1.46x | -0.89x | -1.03x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.33x | 0.17x | 0.28x | 0.11x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.16x | 1.09x | 0.16x | 0.97x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 378.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-80 for PRTS. GFAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLWS's 1.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GFAI scores 6/9 vs FLWS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -56.9% | -55.5% | -69.7% | -79.8% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -36.3% | -16.9% | -50.2% | -25.5% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -47.7% | -27.7% | -41.6% | -51.3% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -71.5% | -29.1% | -19.1% | -43.7% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.47x | 1.01x | 0.08x | 0.47x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7M | $225M | -$19M | -$660,000 | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $47M | $22M | $26M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $271M | $3M | $25M | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -14.97x | -1.20x | -167.24x | -49.49x | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $46 for GFAI. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs GFAI's -53.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs GFAI's -60.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.3% | +24.1% | -26.3% | +69.5% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -45.8% | -19.2% | -53.2% | +3.4% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.0% | -42.2% | -93.8% | -81.6% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.0% | -86.4% | -99.5% | -94.4% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.0% | -42.5% | -99.5% | -73.7% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -37.0% | -16.7% | -60.4% | -43.1% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GIFT and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GIFT is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GFAI's 2.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs GFAI's 31.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 1.28x | 2.31x | 1.28x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.08 | $8.44 | $1.50 | $1.36 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.73 | $2.88 | $0.38 | $0.39 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.1% | +54.3% | +31.5% | +62.3% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.9 | 59.0 | 47.0 | 55.3 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 88K | 780K | 378K | 662K | 45.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FLWS as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 107.4% upside for FLWS (target: $10) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | — | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $9.50 | — | — | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | — | — | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AMZN leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
GIFT vs FLWS vs GFAI vs PRTS vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GIFT or FLWS or GFAI or PRTS or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 0% for 1-800-FLOWERS. COM, Inc. (FLWS). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) offers the better valuation at 37. 8x trailing P/E (34. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate 1-800-FLOWERS. COM, Inc. (FLWS) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GIFT or FLWS or GFAI or PRTS or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -99. 5% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus GFAI's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GIFT or FLWS or GFAI or PRTS or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Giftify, Inc.
(GIFT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 04β versus Guardforce AI Co. , Limited's 2. 31β — meaning GFAI is approximately 123% more volatile than GIFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 101% for 1-800-FLOWERS. COM, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — GIFT or FLWS or GFAI or PRTS or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus -8. 0% for 1-800-FLOWERS. COM, Inc. (FLWS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guardforce AI Co. , Limited grew EPS 88. 3% year-over-year, compared to -72. 0% for Giftify, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GIFT leads at 199. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GIFT or FLWS or GFAI or PRTS or AMZN?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -21. 2% for Giftify, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMZN leads at 11. 2% versus -20. 7% for GIFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is GIFT or FLWS or GFAI or PRTS or AMZN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FLWS: 107.
4% to $9. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — GIFT or FLWS or GFAI or PRTS or AMZN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is GIFT or FLWS or GFAI or PRTS or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+697. 8% 10Y return). Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMZN: +697. 8%, GFAI: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between GIFT and FLWS and GFAI and PRTS and AMZN?
These companies operate in different sectors (GIFT (Technology) and FLWS (Consumer Cyclical) and GFAI (Industrials) and PRTS (Consumer Cyclical) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.