Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GLBZ vs CZWI vs FUNC vs MNSB vs CZFS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
GLBZ vs CZWI vs FUNC vs MNSB vs CZFS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $14M | $203M | $248M | $176M | $317M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16M | $90M | $112M | $136M | $173M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $26K | $14M | $25M | $16M | $37M |
| Gross Margin | 67.4% | 54.7% | 68.8% | 54.4% | 63.3% |
| Operating Margin | -4.0% | 7.0% | 24.4% | 14.0% | 26.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.8x | 8.7x | 10.4x | 8.4x |
| Total Debt | $30M | $52M | $188M | $70M | $309M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $119M | $78M | $25M | $38M |
GLBZ vs CZWI vs FUNC vs MNSB vs CZFS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glen Burnie Bancorp (GLBZ) | 100 | 58.7 | -41.3% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 277.5 | +177.5% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 177.2 | +77.2% |
| Citizens Financial … (CZFS) | 100 | 133.1 | +33.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GLBZ vs CZWI vs FUNC vs MNSB vs CZFS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GLBZ ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 6.1% yield, vs FUNC's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
CZWI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.46, yield 1.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs FUNC's 0.72, lower leverage
FUNC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 16.9%, EPS growth 40.0%
- 289.2% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 157.0%
- PEG 0.77 vs CZWI's 2.32
- 16.9% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
Among these 5 stocks, MNSB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CZFS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for bank quality.
- NIM 3.2% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- Lower P/E (8.4x vs 10.4x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs GLBZ's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs GLBZ's 0.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.9% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.4x vs 10.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs GLBZ's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs FUNC's 0.72, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.1% yield, vs FUNC's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.6% vs GLBZ's +18.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs GLBZ's 0.7% |
GLBZ vs CZWI vs FUNC vs MNSB vs CZFS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GLBZ vs CZWI vs FUNC vs MNSB vs CZFS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FUNC leads in 2 of 6 categories
CZFS leads 1 • GLBZ leads 1 • CZWI leads 0 • MNSB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CZFS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CZFS is the larger business by revenue, generating $173M annually — 10.8x GLBZ's $16M. CZFS is the more profitable business, keeping 21.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GLBZ's -0.7%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16M | $90M | $112M | $136M | $173M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10,000 | $9M | $36M | $23M | $45M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $26,000 | $14M | $25M | $16M | $37M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $11M | $16M | $13M | $35M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.4% | +54.7% | +68.8% | +54.4% | +63.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | +7.0% | +24.4% | +14.0% | +26.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.7% | +16.0% | +18.4% | +11.5% | +21.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | +11.5% | +18.2% | +7.8% | +20.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.8% | +63.0% | +20.2% | +120.9% | +31.3% |
Valuation Metrics
GLBZ leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.6x trailing earnings, CZFS trades at a 40% valuation discount to CZWI's 14.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FUNC offers better value at 1.08x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $203M | $248M | $176M | $317M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20M | $136M | $357M | $221M | $588M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -125.61x | 14.44x | 12.12x | 13.36x | 8.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.78x | 8.68x | 10.45x | 8.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.85x | 1.08x | — | 2.17x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.28x | 11.52x | 11.58x | 13.04x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.88x | 2.25x | 2.22x | 1.30x | 1.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.79x | 1.09x | 1.39x | 0.82x | 0.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 19.55x | 12.18x | 16.57x | 8.99x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC delivers a 12.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $0 for GLBZ. CZWI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GLBZ's 1.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CZWI scores 6/9 vs GLBZ's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.1% | +7.8% | +12.5% | +7.3% | +11.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.0% | +0.8% | +1.2% | +0.7% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.0% | +2.0% | +5.9% | +5.0% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.1% | +0.6% | +8.5% | +0.9% | +7.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.68x | 0.28x | 1.05x | 0.32x | 0.92x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | -$67M | $109M | $45M | $271M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $119M | $78M | $25M | $38M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30M | $52M | $188M | $70M | $309M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.06x | 0.16x | 1.01x | 0.31x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $23,452 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,088 for GLBZ. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +45.6% total return vs GLBZ's +18.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 47.1% vs GLBZ's -12.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.7% | +21.5% | +4.4% | +19.4% | +19.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.6% | +45.6% | +27.8% | +26.4% | +18.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.7% | +160.0% | +218.6% | +21.5% | -10.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.1% | +71.2% | +134.5% | +20.6% | +29.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.9% | +157.0% | +289.2% | +126.9% | +82.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.3% | +37.5% | +47.1% | +6.7% | -3.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GLBZ and CZFS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GLBZ is the less volatile stock with a -0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUNC's 0.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CZFS currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs GLBZ's 82.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.42x | 0.46x | 0.72x | 0.66x | 0.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.88 | $22.62 | $41.95 | $25.17 | $69.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.71 | $12.83 | $28.00 | $17.86 | $49.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.7% | +93.2% | +91.0% | +93.4% | +94.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.2 | 63.7 | 50.6 | 50.4 | 48.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1K | 40K | 11K | 58K | 8K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GLBZ and CZWI and FUNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CZWI as "Buy", FUNC as "Buy", MNSB as "Hold", CZFS as "Buy". For income investors, GLBZ offers the higher dividend yield at 6.15% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $25.00 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.1% | +1.8% | +2.2% | — | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.30 | $0.37 | $0.82 | — | $1.99 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.1% | +1.6% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
FUNC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CZFS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
GLBZ vs CZWI vs FUNC vs MNSB vs CZFS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GLBZ or CZWI or FUNC or MNSB or CZFS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger pick with 16.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Citizens Financial Services, Inc. (CZFS) offers the better valuation at 8. 6x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GLBZ or CZWI or FUNC or MNSB or CZFS?
On trailing P/E, Citizens Financial Services, Inc.
(CZFS) is the cheapest at 8. 6x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, Citizens Financial Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First United Corporation wins at 0. 77x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GLBZ or CZWI or FUNC or MNSB or CZFS?
Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +134.
5%, compared to -49. 1% for Glen Burnie Bancorp (GLBZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +289. 2% versus GLBZ's -20. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GLBZ or CZWI or FUNC or MNSB or CZFS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Glen Burnie Bancorp (GLBZ) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
42β versus First United Corporation's 0. 72β — meaning FUNC is approximately -271% more volatile than GLBZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 168% for Glen Burnie Bancorp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GLBZ or CZWI or FUNC or MNSB or CZFS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First United Corporation (FUNC) is pulling ahead at 16.
9% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to -107. 7% for Glen Burnie Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GLBZ or CZWI or FUNC or MNSB or CZFS?
Citizens Financial Services, Inc.
(CZFS) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 1% net margin versus -0. 7% for Glen Burnie Bancorp — meaning it keeps 21. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CZFS leads at 26. 0% versus -4. 0% for GLBZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUNC leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GLBZ or CZWI or FUNC or MNSB or CZFS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 77x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Citizens Financial Services, Inc. (CZFS) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 3. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — GLBZ or CZWI or FUNC or MNSB or CZFS?
In this comparison, GLBZ (6.
1% yield), CZFS (3. 0% yield), FUNC (2. 2% yield), CZWI (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. MNSB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GLBZ or CZWI or FUNC or MNSB or CZFS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Glen Burnie Bancorp (GLBZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
42), 6. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GLBZ: -20. 9%, MNSB: +126. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GLBZ and CZWI and FUNC and MNSB and CZFS?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GLBZ is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FUNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZFS is a small-cap deep-value stock. GLBZ, CZWI, FUNC, CZFS pay a dividend while MNSB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.