GOLF vs FTDR

For growth investors, Frontdoor, Inc.

(FTDR) is the stronger pick with 13. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 1% for Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF). Frontdoor, Inc. (FTDR) offers the better valuation at 19. 9x trailing P/E (15. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) a "Hold" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Frontdoor, Inc.

(FTDR) is the cheapest at 19. 9x versus Acushnet Holdings Corp. at 28. 9x. On forward P/E, Frontdoor, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Frontdoor, Inc. wins at 0. 72x versus Acushnet Holdings Corp. 's 1. 24x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Acushnet Holdings Corp.

(GOLF) delivered a total return of +81. 1%, compared to +29. 0% for Frontdoor, Inc. (FTDR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOLF returned +434. 4% versus FTDR's +126. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Frontdoor, Inc.

(FTDR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 04β versus Acushnet Holdings Corp. 's 1. 17β — meaning GOLF is approximately 13% more volatile than FTDR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 137% versus 5% for Frontdoor, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Frontdoor, Inc.

(FTDR) is pulling ahead at 13. 6% versus 4. 1% for Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Frontdoor, Inc. grew EPS 13. 6% year-over-year, compared to -8. 0% for Acushnet Holdings Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FTDR leads at 8. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Frontdoor, Inc.

(FTDR) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 2% net margin versus 7. 4% for Acushnet Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps 12. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FTDR leads at 19. 1% versus 11. 5% for GOLF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FTDR leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Frontdoor, Inc. (FTDR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 72x versus Acushnet Holdings Corp. 's 1. 24x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Frontdoor, Inc. (FTDR) trades at 15. 2x forward P/E versus 24. 1x for Acushnet Holdings Corp. — 8. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GOLF: 3. 3% to $92. 50.

In this comparison, GOLF (1.

0% yield) pays a dividend. FTDR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Acushnet Holdings Corp.

(GOLF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 17), 1. 0% yield, +434. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOLF: +434. 4%, FTDR: +126. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

GOLF pays a dividend while FTDR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.