Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GOVX vs IOVA vs IMVT vs NKTR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
GOVX vs IOVA vs IMVT vs NKTR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $2M | $1.27B | $5.53B | $1.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $286M | $0.00 | $55M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-21M | $-354M | $-464M | $-164M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 114.5% | — | 99.6% |
| Operating Margin | -8.7% | -127.2% | — | -237.9% |
| Total Debt | $843.17B | $48M | $98K | $149M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $163M | $714M | $15M |
GOVX vs IOVA vs IMVT vs NKTR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GeoVax Labs, Inc. (GOVX) | 100 | 3.7 | -96.3% |
| Iovance Biotherapeu… (IOVA) | 100 | 10.8 | -89.2% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 77.4 | -22.6% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 33.5 | -66.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GOVX vs IOVA vs IMVT vs NKTR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GOVX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth -37.1%, EPS growth 81.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 212.5%
- -0.0% ROA vs NKTR's -62.8%, ROIC -0.0% vs -57.2%
IOVA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 60.6% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9%
IMVT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.37
- 173.6% 10Y total return vs IOVA's -34.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 11.16x
- Beta 1.37, current ratio 11.16x
NKTR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +8.2% vs IOVA's +13.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 60.6% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs GOVX's -8.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.37 vs GOVX's 2.23, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs IOVA's +13.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.0% ROA vs NKTR's -62.8%, ROIC -0.0% vs -57.2% |
GOVX vs IOVA vs IMVT vs NKTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
GOVX vs IOVA vs IMVT vs NKTR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOVX leads in 2 of 6 categories
IOVA leads 1 • NKTR leads 1 • IMVT leads 1
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IOVA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IOVA and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $286M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -123.9% (IOVA) to -8.6% (GOVX). On growth, IOVA holds the edge at +44.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $286M | $0 | $55M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$22M | -$330M | -$487M | -$130M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$21M | -$354M | -$464M | -$164M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$21M | -$305M | -$423M | -$209M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +114.5% | — | +99.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.7% | -127.2% | — | -2.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.6% | -123.9% | — | -3.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.6% | -106.8% | — | -3.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +44.8% | — | -25.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +86.9% | +47.2% | +19.7% | -4.5% |
Valuation Metrics
GOVX leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $1.3B | $5.5B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $843.2B | $1.2B | $4.8B | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.08x | -3.26x | -9.97x | -8.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.68x | 4.82x | — | 30.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 1.82x | 5.83x | 15.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOVX leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOVX delivers a -0.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-0 in annual profit, vs $-4 for NKTR. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NKTR's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IOVA scores 5/9 vs NKTR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.0% | -50.2% | -47.1% | -4.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.0% | -38.8% | -44.1% | -62.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.0% | -48.9% | — | -57.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.0% | -51.6% | -66.1% | -55.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.07x | 0.00x | 1.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $843.2B | -$115M | -$714M | $134M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $163M | $714M | $15M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $843.2B | $48M | $98,000 | $149M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | -4.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $16,241 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $197 for GOVX. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +818.2% total return vs IOVA's +13.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 93.3% vs GOVX's -43.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +750.2% | +40.9% | +5.1% | +92.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +89.4% | +13.4% | +96.1% | +818.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.4% | -49.9% | +40.9% | +621.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.0% | -87.6% | +62.4% | -72.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.0% | -34.3% | +173.6% | -59.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -43.9% | -20.6% | +12.1% | +93.3% |
Risk & Volatility
IMVT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IMVT is the less volatile stock with a 1.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GOVX's 2.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs GOVX's 40.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.23x | 2.01x | 1.37x | 1.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.40 | $5.63 | $30.09 | $109.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.12 | $1.64 | $13.36 | $7.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.0% | +63.1% | +90.5% | +76.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.8 | 63.1 | 60.2 | 53.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 217K | 16.2M | 1.4M | 991K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IOVA as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 67.2% upside for IMVT (target: $46) vs -43.7% for IOVA (target: $2).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.00 | $45.50 | $132.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 20 | 23 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GOVX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). IOVA leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
GOVX vs IOVA vs IMVT vs NKTR: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GOVX or IOVA or IMVT or NKTR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(IOVA) is the stronger pick with 60. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). Analysts rate Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. (IOVA) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GOVX or IOVA or IMVT or NKTR?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +62. 4%, compared to -98. 0% for GeoVax Labs, Inc. (GOVX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +173. 6% versus GOVX's -96. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GOVX or IOVA or IMVT or NKTR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 37β versus GeoVax Labs, Inc. 's 2. 23β — meaning GOVX is approximately 62% more volatile than IMVT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 166% for Nektar Therapeutics — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — GOVX or IOVA or IMVT or NKTR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(IOVA) is pulling ahead at 60. 6% versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GeoVax Labs, Inc. grew EPS 81. 4% year-over-year, compared to -45. 2% for Immunovant, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GOVX leads at 212. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GOVX or IOVA or IMVT or NKTR?
Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -862. 3% for GeoVax Labs, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IMVT leads at 0. 0% versus -869. 3% for GOVX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOVX leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — GOVX or IOVA or IMVT or NKTR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is GOVX or IOVA or IMVT or NKTR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+173. 6% 10Y return). GeoVax Labs, Inc. (GOVX) carries a higher beta of 2. 23 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IMVT: +173. 6%, GOVX: -96. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GOVX and IOVA and IMVT and NKTR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GOVX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IOVA is a small-cap high-growth stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.