Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GPRK vs XOM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GPRK
GeoPark Limited

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyNYSE • CO
Market Cap$472M
5Y Perf.+8.1%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation

Oil & Gas Integrated

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$620.85B
5Y Perf.+222.2%

GPRK vs XOM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GPRK logoGPRK
XOM logoXOM
IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Integrated
Market Cap$472M$620.85B
Revenue (TTM)$355M$323.90B
Net Income (TTM)$37M$28.84B
Gross Margin44.3%21.7%
Operating Margin26.3%10.5%
Forward P/E7.8x14.8x
Total Debt$580M$43.54B
Cash & Equiv.$100M$10.68B

GPRK vs XOMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GPRK
XOM
StockMay 20May 26Return
GeoPark Limited (GPRK)100108.1+8.1%
Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM)100322.2+222.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GPRK vs XOM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: XOM leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. GeoPark Limited is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GPRK
GeoPark Limited
The Income Pick

GPRK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta -0.04, yield 5.1%
  • 329.4% 10Y total return vs XOM's 105.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta -0.04, current ratio 1.60x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
The Growth Play

XOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth -4.5%, EPS growth -14.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.7%
  • -4.5% revenue growth vs GPRK's -25.5%
  • Lower D/E ratio (16.3% vs 235.8%)
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthXOM logoXOM-4.5% revenue growth vs GPRK's -25.5%
ValueGPRK logoGPRKLower P/E (7.8x vs 14.8x)
Quality / MarginsGPRK logoGPRK10.3% margin vs XOM's 8.9%
Stability / SafetyXOM logoXOMLower D/E ratio (16.3% vs 235.8%)
DividendsGPRK logoGPRK5.1% yield, vs XOM's 2.7%
Momentum (1Y)XOM logoXOM+43.9% vs GPRK's +39.8%
Efficiency (ROA)XOM logoXOM6.4% ROA vs GPRK's 3.4%, ROIC 8.6% vs 20.4%

GPRK vs XOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GPRKGeoPark Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

XOMExxon Mobil Corporation
FY 2025
Energy Products
68.7%$217.8B
Upstream
17.6%$55.7B
Chemical Products
6.0%$18.9B
Specialty Products
5.4%$17.3B
Income From Equity Affiliates
1.7%$5.3B
Other Revenue
0.6%$2.1B

GPRK vs XOM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLGPRKLAGGINGXOM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

GPRK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 912.0x GPRK's $355M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 10.3% (GPRK) to 8.9% (XOM). On growth, XOM holds the edge at -1.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGPRK logoGPRKGeoPark LimitedXOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$355M$323.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$180M$59.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$37M$28.8B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$84M$23.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+44.3%+21.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+26.3%+10.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+10.3%+8.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-23.6%+7.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-23.3%-1.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+100.0%-11.0%
GPRK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

GPRK leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 9.5x trailing earnings, GPRK trades at a 56% valuation discount to XOM's 21.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GPRK's 3.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than XOM's 10.9x.

MetricGPRK logoGPRKGeoPark LimitedXOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…
Market CapShares × price$472M$620.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$951M$653.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS9.54x21.86x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.82x14.79x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple3.40x10.91x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.96x1.92x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.92x2.37x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF26.29x
GPRK leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

GPRK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

GPRK delivers a 16.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $11 for XOM. XOM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GPRK's 2.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GPRK scores 4/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.

MetricGPRK logoGPRKGeoPark LimitedXOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+16.9%+10.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.4%+6.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+20.4%+8.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+18.7%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–943
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.36x0.16x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$479M$32.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$100M$10.7B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$580M$43.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.51x69.44x
GPRK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

XOM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in XOM five years ago would be worth $26,464 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,911 for GPRK. Over the past 12 months, XOM leads with a +43.9% total return vs GPRK's +39.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XOM at 13.2% vs GPRK's 0.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGPRK logoGPRKGeoPark LimitedXOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+26.0%+20.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+39.8%+43.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1.4%+44.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-30.9%+164.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+329.4%+105.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+0.5%+13.2%
XOM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — GPRK and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GPRK's -0.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GPRK currently trades 88.6% from its 52-week high vs XOM's 83.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGPRK logoGPRKGeoPark LimitedXOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.04x-0.15x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$10.34$176.41
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.75$101.19
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+88.6%+83.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.942.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.1M18.9M
Evenly matched — GPRK and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — GPRK and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates GPRK as "Buy" and XOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 25.6% upside for GPRK (target: $12) vs 9.5% for XOM (target: $160). For income investors, GPRK offers the higher dividend yield at 5.13% vs XOM's 2.73%.

MetricGPRK logoGPRKGeoPark LimitedXOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$11.50$160.43
# AnalystsCovering analysts955
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+5.1%+2.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises026
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.47$4.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.3%
Evenly matched — GPRK and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

GPRK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). XOM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallGeoPark Limited (GPRK)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GPRK vs XOM: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GPRK or XOM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger pick with -4.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 5% for GeoPark Limited (GPRK). GeoPark Limited (GPRK) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (7. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GeoPark Limited (GPRK) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GPRK or XOM?

On trailing P/E, GeoPark Limited (GPRK) is the cheapest at 9.

5x versus Exxon Mobil Corporation at 21. 9x. On forward P/E, GeoPark Limited is actually cheaper at 7. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GPRK or XOM?

Over the past 5 years, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) delivered a total return of +164.

6%, compared to -30. 9% for GeoPark Limited (GPRK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GPRK returned +329. 4% versus XOM's +105. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GPRK or XOM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

15β versus GeoPark Limited's -0. 04β — meaning GPRK is approximately -72% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 2% for GeoPark Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GPRK or XOM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is pulling ahead at -4.

5% versus -25. 5% for GeoPark Limited (GPRK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Exxon Mobil Corporation grew EPS -14. 5% year-over-year, compared to -47. 0% for GeoPark Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, XOM leads at -6. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GPRK or XOM?

GeoPark Limited (GPRK) is the more profitable company, earning 10.

1% net margin versus 8. 9% for Exxon Mobil Corporation — meaning it keeps 10. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GPRK leads at 33. 0% versus 10. 5% for XOM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GPRK leads at 45. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GPRK or XOM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, GeoPark Limited (GPRK) trades at 7.

8x forward P/E versus 14. 8x for Exxon Mobil Corporation — 7. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GPRK: 25. 6% to $11. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GPRK or XOM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

GeoPark Limited (GPRK) offers the highest yield at 5. 1%, versus 2. 7% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM).

09

Is GPRK or XOM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, GeoPark Limited (GPRK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

04), 5. 1% yield, +329. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GPRK: +329. 4%, XOM: +105. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GPRK and XOM?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GPRK is a small-cap deep-value stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

GPRK

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

XOM

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GPRK and XOM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GPRK: -23.3% · XOM: -1.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(GPRK: 10.3% · XOM: 8.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(GPRK: 9.5x · XOM: 21.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.