Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GPRK vs XOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Integrated
GPRK vs XOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Market Cap | $472M | $620.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $355M | $323.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $37M | $28.84B |
| Gross Margin | 44.3% | 21.7% |
| Operating Margin | 26.3% | 10.5% |
| Forward P/E | 7.8x | 14.8x |
| Total Debt | $580M | $43.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $100M | $10.68B |
GPRK vs XOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GeoPark Limited (GPRK) | 100 | 108.1 | +8.1% |
| Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM) | 100 | 322.2 | +222.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GPRK vs XOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GPRK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta -0.04, yield 5.1%
- 329.4% 10Y total return vs XOM's 105.0%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.04, current ratio 1.60x
XOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth -4.5%, EPS growth -14.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.7%
- -4.5% revenue growth vs GPRK's -25.5%
- Lower D/E ratio (16.3% vs 235.8%)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -4.5% revenue growth vs GPRK's -25.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.8x vs 14.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.3% margin vs XOM's 8.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (16.3% vs 235.8%) | |
| Dividends | 5.1% yield, vs XOM's 2.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.9% vs GPRK's +39.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs GPRK's 3.4%, ROIC 8.6% vs 20.4% |
GPRK vs XOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GPRK vs XOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GPRK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 912.0x GPRK's $355M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 10.3% (GPRK) to 8.9% (XOM). On growth, XOM holds the edge at -1.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $355M | $323.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $180M | $59.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $37M | $28.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$84M | $23.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.3% | +21.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.3% | +10.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.3% | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -23.6% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -23.3% | -1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -11.0% |
Valuation Metrics
GPRK leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, GPRK trades at a 56% valuation discount to XOM's 21.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GPRK's 3.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than XOM's 10.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $472M | $620.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $951M | $653.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.54x | 21.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.82x | 14.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.40x | 10.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.96x | 1.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.92x | 2.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 26.29x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GPRK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GPRK delivers a 16.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $11 for XOM. XOM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GPRK's 2.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GPRK scores 4/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.9% | +10.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.4% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.4% | +8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.7% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.36x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $479M | $32.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $100M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $580M | $43.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.51x | 69.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XOM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XOM five years ago would be worth $26,464 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,911 for GPRK. Over the past 12 months, XOM leads with a +43.9% total return vs GPRK's +39.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XOM at 13.2% vs GPRK's 0.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.0% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.8% | +43.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.4% | +44.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.9% | +164.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +329.4% | +105.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.5% | +13.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GPRK and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GPRK's -0.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GPRK currently trades 88.6% from its 52-week high vs XOM's 83.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.04x | -0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.34 | $176.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.75 | $101.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.6% | +83.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.9 | 42.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 18.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GPRK and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GPRK as "Buy" and XOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 25.6% upside for GPRK (target: $12) vs 9.5% for XOM (target: $160). For income investors, GPRK offers the higher dividend yield at 5.13% vs XOM's 2.73%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.50 | $160.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.1% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 26 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.47 | $4.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.3% |
GPRK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). XOM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
GPRK vs XOM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GPRK or XOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger pick with -4.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 5% for GeoPark Limited (GPRK). GeoPark Limited (GPRK) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (7. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GeoPark Limited (GPRK) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GPRK or XOM?
On trailing P/E, GeoPark Limited (GPRK) is the cheapest at 9.
5x versus Exxon Mobil Corporation at 21. 9x. On forward P/E, GeoPark Limited is actually cheaper at 7. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GPRK or XOM?
Over the past 5 years, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) delivered a total return of +164.
6%, compared to -30. 9% for GeoPark Limited (GPRK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GPRK returned +329. 4% versus XOM's +105. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GPRK or XOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus GeoPark Limited's -0. 04β — meaning GPRK is approximately -72% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 2% for GeoPark Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GPRK or XOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is pulling ahead at -4.
5% versus -25. 5% for GeoPark Limited (GPRK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Exxon Mobil Corporation grew EPS -14. 5% year-over-year, compared to -47. 0% for GeoPark Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, XOM leads at -6. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GPRK or XOM?
GeoPark Limited (GPRK) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
1% net margin versus 8. 9% for Exxon Mobil Corporation — meaning it keeps 10. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GPRK leads at 33. 0% versus 10. 5% for XOM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GPRK leads at 45. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GPRK or XOM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, GeoPark Limited (GPRK) trades at 7.
8x forward P/E versus 14. 8x for Exxon Mobil Corporation — 7. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GPRK: 25. 6% to $11. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — GPRK or XOM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
GeoPark Limited (GPRK) offers the highest yield at 5. 1%, versus 2. 7% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM).
09Is GPRK or XOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, GeoPark Limited (GPRK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
04), 5. 1% yield, +329. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GPRK: +329. 4%, XOM: +105. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GPRK and XOM?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GPRK is a small-cap deep-value stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.