Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GRCE vs ALNY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
GRCE vs ALNY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $35M | $39.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $4.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $577M |
| Gross Margin | — | 80.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 44.2x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $22M | $1.66B |
GRCE vs ALNY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grace Therapeutics,… (GRCE) | 100 | 70.3 | -29.7% |
| Alnylam Pharmaceuti… (ALNY) | 100 | 111.0 | +11.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GRCE vs ALNY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, GRCE is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
ALNY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.71
- Rev growth 65.2%, EPS growth 206.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 53.0%
- 411.9% 10Y total return vs GRCE's -25.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.2% revenue growth vs GRCE's 55.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.5% margin vs GRCE's 1.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs GRCE's 0.87 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.0% vs GRCE's -25.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.8% ROA vs GRCE's -8.7%, ROIC 33.4% vs -30.1% |
GRCE vs ALNY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GRCE vs ALNY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALNY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALNY and GRCE operate at a comparable scale, with $4.3B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | $677M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | $577M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $641M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +80.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +13.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +96.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +61.1% | +4.4% |
Valuation Metrics
GRCE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $35M | $39.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13M | $39.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.85x | 127.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 44.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 70.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 10.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.41x | 50.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 84.84x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALNY leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALNY delivers a 98.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $98 in annual profit, vs $-9 for GRCE. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALNY scores 6/9 vs GRCE's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.2% | +98.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.7% | +11.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -30.1% | +33.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -23.5% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$22M | -$379M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $22M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALNY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALNY five years ago would be worth $22,537 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,475 for GRCE. Over the past 12 months, ALNY leads with a +7.0% total return vs GRCE's -25.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALNY at 12.1% vs GRCE's -9.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -38.5% | -26.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -25.5% | +7.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.2% | +40.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.2% | +125.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.2% | +411.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.2% | +12.1% |
Risk & Volatility
ALNY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALNY is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GRCE's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALNY currently trades 59.7% from its 52-week high vs GRCE's 43.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.18 | $495.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.79 | $245.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.4% | +59.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.1 | 43.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 886K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $445.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ALNY leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GRCE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
GRCE vs ALNY: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GRCE or ALNY a better buy right now?
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) offers the better valuation at 127. 0x trailing P/E (44. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ALNY) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GRCE or ALNY?
Over the past 5 years, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) delivered a total return of +125. 4%, compared to -25. 2% for Grace Therapeutics, Inc. (GRCE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALNY returned +411. 9% versus GRCE's -25. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GRCE or ALNY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus Grace Therapeutics, Inc. 's 0. 87β — meaning GRCE is approximately 23% more volatile than ALNY relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — GRCE or ALNY?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
grew EPS 206. 9% year-over-year, compared to 54. 3% for Grace Therapeutics, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GRCE or ALNY?
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 4% net margin versus 0. 0% for Grace Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALNY leads at 13. 5% versus 0. 0% for GRCE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALNY leads at 81. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — GRCE or ALNY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is GRCE or ALNY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71), +411. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALNY: +411. 9%, GRCE: -25. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GRCE and ALNY?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GRCE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALNY is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.